One of the Children’s Welfare Institute has spent 390, 000 yuan($ 61, 464)to buy a luxury Mercedes. Major officials at the Hefei

admin2017-09-26  16

问题     One of the Children’s Welfare Institute has spent 390, 000 yuan($ 61, 464)to buy a luxury Mercedes. Major officials at the Hefei bureau of civil affairs told media that the purchase of the car was approved by authorities and confirms to procedures and regulations. The comments attracted widespread criticism from the public.
    Comment 1
    It’s the government’s responsibility to financially support non-profit social welfare institutions such as children’s welfare institutes, and the public will have no objection to money being spent on children.
    Comment 2
    But it’s inappropriate for these institutions to purchase a luxury car, which has little to do with children’s welfare. It’s a waste of public finances even if it does satisfy a so-called legal procedure.
    Comment 3
    In many areas of the country there are still many things that need improvement in children’s welfare. Many children in need can barely get daily necessities due to financial difficulties in local areas. The luxury car scandal has exposed imbalance in children’s welfare, and much more supervision is needed in this field.
    Comment 4
    They are not mixable. Affordable housing and food should be the focus.
    Comment 5
    Since authority has approved their action, it’s none of our business. It doesn’t matter how much they spent their money on cars, because I never donate any of my penny for them. I would rather give money to the children in needed directly.
    Comment 6
    The charity institute should be closed. You never know where the money you donate has gone.
What is the attitude of Comment 1?

选项 A、Objective.
B、Negative.
C、Positive.
D、Affirmative.

答案A

解析 该帖认为政府为其募集的资金,公众没有权利反对(objection)在孩子身上如何花 钱。因此该帖表示的态度是中立的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w5Li777K
0

最新回复(0)