首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
72
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
Excuseme,butitistimetohaveyourtemperature______.
Theway_____helooksatproblemsiswrong.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
Thesentence"______White______hissisteriscomingtoourhelp."iswrong.
随机试题
A.红景天苷B.水杨苷C.芥子苷D.腺苷E.牡荆素属于氮苷类化合物的是()。
甲在国外旅游,见有人兜售高仿真人民币,用1万元换取10万元假币,将假币夹在书中寄回国内。(事实一)赵氏调味品公司欲设加盟店,销售具有注册商标的赵氏调味品,派员工赵某物色合作者。甲知道自己不符加盟条件,仍找到赵某送其2万元真币和10万元假币,请其帮忙加盟事
甲某是某中药厂厂长,组织该厂生产大量假药销售给个体医生,销售额达到16万元,其违法所得均归本单位所有。甲某()。
关于建筑材料力学性质,下列说法不正确的是()。
在下列进度控制纠偏措施中,属于管理措施的是()。
个人理财规划一般包括( )。Ⅰ.投资规划Ⅱ.居住规划Ⅲ.个人风险管理和保险规划Ⅳ.个人税务规划Ⅴ.退休计划
王女士现有资金20万元,现阶段通货膨胀率达8%,那么预计()年之后这笔资金将会缩减至10万元的购买力。
我的四季张洁①生命如四季。②春天,我在这片土地上,用我细瘦的胳膊,紧扶着我锈钝的犁。深埋在泥土里的树根、石块,磕绊着我的犁头,消耗着我成倍的体力。我汗流浃背,四肢颤抖,恨不得立刻躺倒在那片刚刚开垦的泥土之上。可我懂得
人民警察的工作纪律包括()三个方面。
Whattimewastheman’sappointment?
最新回复
(
0
)