首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
41
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
TheYellowRiveristhesecond______riverinChina.
Americansareproudoftheirvarietyandindividuality(个性),yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheri
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Shoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforawoman.Amangoesshoppingbecauseheneedssomething.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
______intheopenair,wetclothescangetdryeasily.
Theway_____helooksatproblemsiswrong.
随机试题
望洋向若而叹。望洋:
简要分析遗忘的规律及主要原因。
喉梗阻常见病因是__________、__________、__________、__________、__________。
脓肿或死腔的引流物拔除的时间应在
原告:五湖贸易公司被告:天云农场原告、被告于2005年9月6日签订了一份棉花购销合同。合同约定:被告向原告供应乙级皮棉1000担,每担220元,共计22万元;交货时间为当年11月;交货方式为原告自提。合同还约定:原告应向被告交付6万元定金;
下列关于零基预算的编制程序,说法错误的是()。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档WORD1.DOCX,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(WORD1.DOCX)保存文档。【文档开始】为什么铁在月秋上不生锈?众所周知,铁有一个致命的缺
一个字长为8位的无符号二进制整数能表示的十进制数值范围是()。
Thecrippledboyproudlywalkedwitha______totheplatformtojointheactors.
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweareinourteensorearlytwentiesthanatanyotherti
最新回复
(
0
)