首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
35
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Itwasyourbrother______Imetatthestation.
Georgedid______thananyoneelse.
HOWTOBOOKBookopensforBeckettShortson8September.BYTELEPHONEForcreditcard(信用卡)bookings.Callsare
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
AttheUniversityofKansasartmuseum,scientiststestedtheeffectofdifferentcoloredwallsontwogroupsofvisitorstoan
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
随机试题
热处理时,应将试样与工件同时装入炉中,并且应确保试样位于有代表性的位置。()
Abudget(预算)isaspendingplan.Itcanhelpyouspendmoneywisely.Itcandothisbycuttingoutwastefulspending.Ofcourse
男,25岁,活动后心悸,气促4年,偶感心前区疼痛。查体:血压18.6/5.3kPa(140/40mmHg),心界向左下扩大,胸骨左缘第3肋间闻及舒张期叹气样杂音。最可能的诊断为
半数有效量是指
败毒散的组成中含有的药物是
商品房前期物业管理的委托方为房地产开发企业。[2005年考题]()
对于会计职业和会计工作而言,“公正”主要包括()。
【背景材料(大意)】材料1:新华报业网讯(2016.2.18)每年节后都是职工离职或跳槽高峰,一些在岗时不敢提,或是被用人单位忽视的劳动权益,也在此时被一些离职员工秋后算账。这不,节后刚开始上班,就有不少离职者到劳动监察部门咨询或投诉,其中,带薪休假权
个别行业公私合营阶段,对企业利润的分配实行
Readthefollowingarticleinwhichfourpeopletalkabouttheirworkandlife.Forquestions61to64,matchthenameofeachs
最新回复
(
0
)