首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
43
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Anyonewhohaseverattendedauniversityknowsthatthequalityoflecturersvariesgreatly.Afewareveryeffectivecommunica
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
Parentshavetodomuchlessfortheirchildrenthantheyusedtodo,andhomehasbecomemuchlessofaworkshop.Clothescanb
Thesentence"______White______hissisteriscomingtoourhelp."iswrong.
随机试题
甲乙两人系同事,甲曾委托乙创作一剧本,乙碍于情面答应为其创作,但双方没有订立任何书面合同,也未作出明确的口头约定。乙按时完稿交甲审阅,甲看后让乙再作修改。后甲因工作关系调到他省工作,乙修改完作品即以自己的名义对外发表。甲知悉后,提出著作权属于自己。依法律规
功能祛风通络、行水消肿,可治风湿痹痛的药物是
下列属于串联电路特点的是()。
设二维随机变量(X,Y)的概率密度为求:关于X和Y的边缘密度;
下列哪项与阴道自净作用无关
晨僵在哪类关节炎中表现最为突出()
建筑行业从业人员实行从业与()的双重管理。
社会控制是指运用社会力量使人们遵从社会规范,维持社会秩序的过程。既指整个社会或社会中的群体、组织对其成员行为的指导、约束和裁判,也指社会成员问的相互影响、相互监督、相互批评。社会控制可分为内在控制和外在控制。内在控制是人们学习一定社会群体的行为规则的过程。
Readthearticlebelowabouttheimpendingflu.ChoosethebestwordtofilleachgapfromA,B,CorD.Foreachquestion(19-3
A、Becausetheyarebusyservingfoodtotheirchildren.B、Becausetheyarebusykeepingorderatthedinnertable.C、Becausethe
最新回复
(
0
)