首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
29
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Oureatinghabitsareveryimportantforgoodhealthandastrongbody.Therearetimeswhenmostofuswouldrathereatsweets
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
Thesentence"______White______hissisteriscomingtoourhelp."iswrong.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
随机试题
导致“久居卑湿之地者,病变较易化湿”的长期作用因素为
石膏的性味是
缩窄性心包炎需与什么疾病鉴别
氯丙嗪对哪种病症的疗效最好
甲公司以公允价值为14000万元、账面价值为9000万元的无形资产作为对价支付给乙公司的原股东丙公司,对乙公司进行控股合并,持股比例为80%。购买日乙公司净资产账面价值为7000万元,公允价值为11000万元。此外,甲公司为处置无形资产发生相关税费700万
记账凭证的内容之一是所附原始凭证的张数和其他附件资料,其“所附原始凭证的张数”必须使用()。
始终做到“三个代表”,是我们党的立党之本、执政之基、力量之源,这里的“本”、“基”、“源”,说到底就是党员的支持和拥护。()
趋同进化是遗传学中的一个概念,指的是不同的物种在进化过程中,由于适应相似的环境而呈现出表型上的相似性。而趋异进化则相反,它是指同一物种在进化过程中,由于适应不同的环境而呈现出表型差异的现象。根据上述定义,下列属于趋异进化的是:
学生的记录由学号和成绩组成,N名学生的数据已在主函数中放入结构体数组s中,请编写函数fun,它的功能是:函数返回指定学号的学生数据,指定的学号在主函数中输入。若没找到指定学号,在结构体变量中给学号置空串,给成绩置-1,作为函数值返回。(用于字符串比较的函数
Politicians,activistsandparentsoweittotheirchildrento______educationalopportunity,whetherthatmeansconfrontingsc
最新回复
(
0
)