首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
36
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
FireandWaterShundagarhisavillageonIndia’seast-facingcoast.Itisavillageofsimplemudandgrasshousesbuilton
Anyonewhohaseverattendedauniversityknowsthatthequalityoflecturersvariesgreatly.Afewareveryeffectivecommunica
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
随机试题
Whatcanleaveagoodimpressionwhenwemakemistakes?Thinkingof_________________tomakeitup.
下列关于收入的说法,不正确的是()。
可抑制胃蠕动及排空,延长某些药物在胃内滞留时间的中药是()
体质的构成要素包括
划拨是取得国有土地使用权的方式之一。下列关于划拨土地使用权的表述,正确的是:()
建设项目总结评价中效果和效益评价的主要内容是()。
全面风险管理的范围是指()。
【2013年德州市市直】以下属于元认知计划策略的是()。
Areceiptmustbe______forallexchangesandrefunds.
Clonaid,acompanyassociatedbyagroupthatbelievesextraterrestrialscreatedmankind,announcedFridaythatithadproduced
最新回复
(
0
)