首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
63
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wcU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
下列哪些适宜施行甲状腺大部切除术
Severalclassesofbittercitruscompoundhavelookedpromisingasanticanceragentsinlaboratorytests.Anewstudyindicates
Itusedtobethatacorporation’scapitalconsistedoftangibleassetssuchasbuildings,machines,andfinishedgoods.But,
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Thebestexerciseshouldrequirecontinuous______,ratherthanfrequentstopsandstarts.
Workhasleftyoufrazzled.Yourlegsachewhenyougetbackfromthegymdon’tpopthoseaspirinsjustyetthinkhotsprings.
Althoughspeechandwritingarethespecialmeansofcommunicatingofhumans,theinterchangealsotakesplaceinmanyotherway
ThenorthAmericanstatesagreedtosigntheagreementofeconomicalandmilitaryunioninOttawa.
Therearemanydoctorswhohaveendeavoredtoincreasethe______oftheirbehaviorasmedicalprofessionals.
随机试题
不同避免地adv.i______
将用汇编语言编写的源程序,生成机器语言的目标程序的过程叫________。
环磷酰胺属于哪一类抗肿瘤药物()。
2岁小儿体重约等于其出生体重的
甲公司指派员工唐某从事新型灯具的研制开发,唐某于2004年3月完成了一种新型灯具的开发。甲公司对该灯具的技术采取了保密措施,并于2005年5月19日申请发明专利。2006年12月1日,国家专利局公布该发明专利申请,并于2007年8月9日授予甲公司专利权。此
建设工程施工招标文件,既是承包商编制投标文件的依据,也是与将来中标的承包商()。
关于分包人与发包人关系的说法,正确的是()。
在债务重组的会计处理中,以下说法正确的有()。
下列不属于股票回购缺点的是( )。
几位旅游者在浏览乾陵时,纷纷爬到石狮的背上照像,导游人员见了连忙上前提醒他们:“大家不要欺负这头石狮,否则它会发怒的。”导游人员此时使用的语言方式是()。
最新回复
(
0
)