首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
40
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wcU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
The______ofemotionalandpsychiatricdisordersthatcanpromptapersontoseektherapyiswide.
Asthedefiningepidemicofamodernagenotableforoverconsumptionandexcess,obesityishardtobeat.Theincreasedavailabi
Peoplewholiveandworkinareaswithelevatedlevelsofozoneandotherairbornepollutantsappeartorunanincreasedriskof
Peoplewholiveandworkinareaswithelevatedlevelsofozoneandotherairbornepollutantsappeartorunanincreasedriskof
ItissaidthatinEnglanddeathispressing,inCanadainevitableandinCaliforniaoptional.Smallwonder.Americans’lifeexp
ThescientistsattheUniversityofBerninSwitzerlandhaveusedaweakenedvirusthatisnotinfectiousandhasprovedsafean
TheOlympicGames______in776B.C.inOlympia,asmalltowninGreece.
A、Becauseitisrequiredofallsciencemajors.B、BecauseitwasmadeinNewYorkCity.C、Becauseitwillbeshownafterworking
A、Poor,untrainedwomen.B、Youngmedicalstudents.C、Wivesofmilitaryofficers.D、Middle-classmenandwomen.A由“Hospitalnursi
A、Boysenjoyplayingwithcubesmorethangirls.B、Girlstendtogetexcitedmoreeasilythanboys.C、Girlsseemtostartreason
随机试题
组织行为规律的研究过程分哪四个步骤?
关于限制型心肌病,下列哪种说法是错误的
A.惊悸B.麻木C.疲乏D.怔忡E.脘痞无明显外界诱因,心跳剧烈,上至心胸,下至脐腹,悸动不安者,称为
清水池的作用包括()。
LOF和ETF存在本质的不同,主要表现在()
一个真正有效的控制系统,应该()。
根据给定的条件,判断是否重复执行某一相同的程序段,属于
以下程序段运行时从键盘上输入字符“-”,则输出结果为 op$=InputBox("op=") Ifop$="+"Thena=a+2 Ifop$="-"Thena=a-2 Printa
______isthemostoutstandingstream-of-consciousnessnovelist.
传统中医(traditionalChinesemedicine)可以不借助任何仪器给病人治病,堪称奇迹。
最新回复
(
0
)