首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2013-12-06
37
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very longwave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans".
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that electromagnetic fields present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wcU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Hemaygivetheimpressionofbeingsevere,butheisquiteakindperson______.
Whicheverapproachisadopted,eachstudentwillrequirematerialand______whichisathislevel.
Althoughspeechandwritingarethespecialmeansofcommunicatingofhumans,theinterchangealsotakesplaceinmanyotherway
Theremustbefewquestionsonwhichresponsibleopinionissoutterlydividedasonthatofhowmuchsleepweoughttohave.Th
TherearemanytheoriesaboutthebeginningofdramainancientGreece.Theonemostwidelyacceptedtodayisbasedontheassum
A、Asawater-basedpaste.B、Asaliquid.C、Instone-sizeblocks.D、Inpowderedform.D从“Whenthissubstancewasgroundintoafi
Theinjectionthatthegirlhadbeengivenwasbeginningtowork.Herhead【C1】______heavy,andshewasverysleepy.Oncesheope
A、Ontheground.B、Incoldplaces.C、Onthehighestbranchesoftrees.D、Insidetreetrunks.A由“Verylikelythefastnestswere
随机试题
A.六一散B.玉女煎C.导赤散D.芍药汤E.黄连解毒汤证见心胸烦热,口渴面赤,口舌生疮者,治疗方剂应选用
患者,男,46岁。患消化道溃疡多年,今晚饮酒后出现上腹部剧烈疼痛,面色苍白,腹肌紧张,全腹明显压痛、反跳痛。该患者首要的护理措施是
农民甲因其邻居乙越界建房侵入自己的宅基地而诉请法院保护,乙的行为侵犯了甲的何种权利?()
会计职业道德规范“坚持准则”中所指准则,不仅指会计准则,还包括()。
李某为资助15岁的王某上学,与王某订立赠与合同,赠与王某10万元,并就该赠与合同办理了公证。后李某无正当理由,在交付给王某6万元后就表示不再赠与了。根据《合同法》的规定,下列表述中,正确的是()。
在烧造方法上首创“覆烧”的瓷器指的是()。
(2013年真题)1949年美国学者泰勒出版的《课程与教学的基本原理》中提出了课程编制四段论,形成了著名的泰勒原理课程编制模式。这一模式称为()。
逻辑学家说:如果2+2=5,则地球是方的。以下哪项和逻辑学家所说的同真?
尽管在最近的选举调查中,所有的被调查者都回答说他们分别忠于两个主要政党之一,但是在这两个主要政党的每个政党中都有超过1/3的选民说他们对这两个主要政党的施政纲领已不再着迷,如果有第三个政党成立,他们将会加入这个政党。然而,即使这个调查反映了全体选民的观点,
在软件设计中,不属于过程设计工具的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)