首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
admin
2015-01-10
93
问题
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins were fat, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were at an all-time high. Almost half a century later, some things look much the same: big American companies have had a hell of a year, with the stock market soaring, margins strong, and profits hitting a new all-time high. But there’s one very noticeable difference. In 1965, CEOs at big companies earned on average about 20 times as much as their typical employee. These days, CEOs earn about 270 times as much.
That huge gap between the top and the middle is the result of a boom in executive compensation, which rose 876 per cent between 1978 and 2011. In response, we’ve had a host of regulatory reforms designed to curb executive pay. The latest of these is a rule, unveiled by the SEC last month, requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the median worker. The idea is that, once the disparity is made public, companies will be less likely to award outsized pay packages.
Faith in disclosure has been crucial to the regulation of executive pay since the 1930s. More recently, rules have made companies detail the size and the structure of compensation packages and have enforced transparency about the kinds of comparisons they rely on to determine salaries. The result is that shareholders today know far more about CEO compensation than ever before. There’s only one problem: even as companies are disclosing more and more, executive pay keeps going up and up.
This isn’ t a coincidence: the drive for transparency has actually helped fuel the spiralling salaries. For one thing, it gives executives a good idea of how much they can get away with asking for. A more crucial reason, though, has to do with the way boards of directors set salaries. As Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere write, boards at most companies use what’ s called " peer benchmarking. " They look at the CEO salaries at peer-group firms, and then peg their CEO’s pay to the 50th, 75th, or 90th percentile of the peer group—never lower. This leads to the so-called Lake Wobegon effect: every CEO gets treated as above average. "Relying on peer-group comparisons, the way boards do, mathematically guarantees that pay is going to go up," Elson told me.
On top of this, peer-group comparisons aren’ t always honest: boards can be too cozy with CEOs and may tweak the comparisons to justify overpaying. A recent study shows that boards tend to include as peers companies that are bigger than they are and that pay CEOs more. The system is skewed by so-called "leapfroggers," the few CEOs in a given year who, whether by innate brilliance or by dumb luck, end up earning astronomical salaries. Those big paydays reset the baseline expectations for everyone else.
This isn’t just an American problem. Nor is it primarily a case of boards being helplessly in thrall to a company’ s executives. Boards are far more independent of management than they used to be, and it’s notable that a CEO hired from outside a company—typically gets 20 to 25 per cent more than an inside candidate. The real issues are subtler, though no less insidious. Some boards remain convinced of what Elson calls "superstar theory": they think that CEOs can work their magic anywhere, and must be overpaid to stay. In addition, Elson said, "if you pay below average, it makes it look as if you’d hired a below-average CEO, and what board wants that?"
Transparent pricing has perverse effects in other fields. In a host of recent cases, public disclosure of the prices that hospitals charge for various procedures has ended up driving prices up rather than down. And the psychological causes in both situations seem similar. We tend to be uneasy about bargaining in situations where the stakes are very high: do you want the guy doing your neurosurgery, or running your company, to be offering discounts? Better, in the event that something goes wrong, to be able to tell yourself that you spent all you could. And overspending is always easier when you’ re spending someone else’ s money. Corporate board members are disbursing shareholder funds; most patients have insurance to foot the bill.
Sunlight is supposed to be the best disinfectant. But there’ s something naive about the new SEC rule, which presumes that full disclosure will embarrass companies enough to restrain executive pay. As Elson told me, "People who can ask to be paid a hundred million dollars are beyond embarrassment. " More important, as long as the system for setting pay is broken, more disclosure makes things worse instead of better. We don’t need more information. We need boards of directors to step up and set pay themselves, instead of outsourcing the job to their peers. The rest of us don’ t get to live in Lake Wobegon. CEOs shouldn’t, either.
Which of the following CANNOT be true about the drive for transparency of executive salaries?
选项
A、It has actually checked the ever increasing of executive salaries.
B、It is intended to disclose the gap in income so as to eliminate such gaps.
C、It gives the boards the chance to compare CEO salaries with peer-group firms.
D、It has led to the formation of "leapfroggers" system and astronomical salaries.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wxSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
PhilanthropyIthasbecomeanAmericantraditionthatthosewhoattaingreatwealthreturnsomeofittothepublicthrough
PhilanthropyIthasbecomeanAmericantraditionthatthosewhoattaingreatwealthreturnsomeofittothepublicthrough
Onthe________inthecountryside,thereareonlyone-tenthasmanydoctorsasthereareinthecity.
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
ThankstoFrancisBacon’s________,themasteryofnaturebecameapositivedoctrineandapervasivemotivation.
Anxietycanresultinstressand________.Yetexpertssaythattheproblemisthatmanypeoplejustconsiderthemasemotionalp
Theproblem"whowillsupervisethesupervisor"hasbeenapuzzlingpropositionthathas________theprocuratorialdepartmentsfo
A、Itisaworldwideproblem.B、Itisaregionalproblem.C、Itisasocialproblem.D、Itisabiologicalproblem.A第一段第二句便提到“The
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939andhaspublishedmorethan40poems.
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
随机试题
下列哪项可引起右室压力负荷过重
传动轴上的防尘罩应配备齐全,并用卡箍紧固,两只卡箍的锁扣应错开_______装配。
G-M直流调速系统可以允许转矩范围内()象限运行的系统。
资本主义银行利润在______、_______、_______、_______。
纤维结构不良的特点不包括
A.120/70mmHg以下B.125/75mmHg以下C.130/80mmHg以下D.140/90mmHg以下E.140/85mmHg以下慢性肾小球肾炎患者,尿蛋白<1g/d,血压应控制在
治疗汗证营卫失调证的首选方剂是
王某向当地的工商局申请工商登记,工商局因其不符合法定条件而不予登记,王某对该行政许可的决定不服,向当地人民法院提起行政诉讼的权利体现了()。
2015年5月,中国居民企业甲以其持有的一处房产向另外一家居民企业乙进行投资,双方约定投资价款5000万元,该房产原值2000万元,取得的货币性资产转让所得3000万元,不考虑其他因素,假设甲企业最大限度的享受现行非货币性资产对外投资的企业所得税政策,则2
下列有关偿债能力分析的说法中,正确的有()。
最新回复
(
0
)