首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
30
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from physical phenomenon______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
由文章第四段第二,三句可知,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。因此是磁场力太弱不会产生有害作用。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wyFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis"thedemocrati
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis"thedemocrati
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis"thedemocrati
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Ahundredyearsagoitwasassumedandscientifically"proved"byeconomiststhatthelawsofsocietymakeitnecessarytohave
随机试题
挤压综合征主要是指伤后出现
患者,男,65岁。反复咳喘20余年,加重1周,嗜睡1天就诊。查体:嗜睡,球结膜水肿,皮肤湿暖,口唇发绀。双肺可闻及干湿性啰音,双侧腱反射减弱,双下肢凹陷性水肿。问题2:为明确诊断,应尽快采取的检查是
某患者,突起腹泻1天,腹泻20余次,呈水样便,腹泻10余次后出现呕吐。查体:血压85/55mmHg。大便镜检:白细胞0~1/HP,粪便培养结果未出。当地正流行霍乱。问下列哪项诊断正确()
已知粉质黏土、黏土和黏性土的桩侧阻力特征值qsia分别为24kPa、16kPa和28kPa,黏性土的桩端端阻力特征值qpa为900kPa。初步设计时按《建筑地基基础设计规范》(GB50007—2002)的规定进行计算,试确定单桩竖向承载力特征值Ra最接近下
某项目对含1%氯化钠的工艺水溶液进行纳滤浓缩除盐,已知除盐水的收率为60%,浓母液含氯化钠为2.4%,则稀溶液含氯化钠浓度为()。
依据《中华人民共和国防治海岸工程建设项目污染损害海洋环境管理条例》,下列海岸工程建设项目采取的环保措施中,符合规定的有()。
根据《民事诉讼法》的规定,该纠纷应由()的法院管辖。如果永安公司提出先予执行的申请,受诉法院()裁定先子执行。
About70,000,000Americansaretryingtoloseweight(减肥).Thatisalmost1【C1】________every3peopleintheUnitedStates.Some
在新一轮没有硝烟的经济战场上,经济增长将主要依靠科技进步。而解剖中国科技创新结构,可以看出,在中国并不缺乏研究型大学、国家实验室,最缺乏的是企业参与的研究基地以及研究型企业。企业资助、共建、独资创立的科研机构,像美国的贝尔实验室,就是这种研究基地。这段文字
下列选项中,属于防卫过当的情形是()。
最新回复
(
0
)