首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
34
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from physical phenomenon______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic field may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body
答案
A
解析
由文章第四段第二,三句可知,当电流通过电缆,产生磁场,对周围物体产生(影响)力。许多年来,科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法”置于一边(不予考虑),主要是因为它们(所产生的力)非常弱。因此是磁场力太弱不会产生有害作用。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wyFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Chinaisintheprocessofbuildingasocialistharmonioussociety(社会主义和谐社会)forthetimebeing.Writeacompositionofnolesst
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis"thedemocrati
Inspiteof"endlesstalkofdifference",Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis"thedemocrati
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
随机试题
下列哪项与原核生物DNA复制错误率低的原因有关
硅酸盐水泥最适用于()工程。
发电厂3~20kV屋外支柱绝缘子和穿墙套管、3~6kV屋外支柱绝缘子和穿墙套管,可采用下列哪一项产品?()
根据《关于清理规范工程建设领域保证金的通知》(国办发[2016]49号),工程质量保证金的预留比例上限不得高于工程价款结算总额的()。
A注册会计师负责审计甲公司20x8年度财务报表。在运用实质性分析程序时,A注册会计师遇到下列事项,请代为做出正确的专业判断。如果在期中实施了实质性程序,在确定对剩余期间实施实质性分析程序是否可以获取充分、适当的审计证据时,A注册会计师通常考虑的因素有(
阅读材料,回答下列问题。材料一2012年10月26日上午,十一届全国人大常委会第二十九次会议召开第三次全体会议,表决通过了精神卫生法。至此,这部从1985年就启动立法工作、长期以来受到社会各界广泛关注的法律正式出台。 材料二2012
0,1,2,(),16,625。
减量化,是指在生产、流通和消费等过程中减少资源的消耗和废物的产生,是循环经济的一种。根据上述定义,下列不属于减量化的是()。
北京市的交通拥堵,实际上是公共资源的高度聚集和城市功能区分布的严重失衡。“摊大饼式”的城市化发展路径令城市越来越大,而卫星城就业、医疗、教育等配套设施发展迟缓,以致市民工作与生活的半径越来越大。要改变这样的局面,需要城市管理者科学规划,对公共资源进行均衡分
某次演练中,直升机悬停于高空,一伞兵(含伞)跳伞后竖直降落,其速度v与时间t的关系如图所示。下列判断正确的是:
最新回复
(
0
)