首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
71
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
What is the main reason Envisat has NOT been maintained?
选项
A、Governments do not properly support these satellite projects financially.
B、Poor ethical and moral implications.
C、Political and idealogical conflict between member countries.
D、Technological capability has not been fully developed.
答案
A
解析
本题为归纳大意题。第六段中第一句话“But the main culprits are governments,which are spending too little on the job.”以及后文一直解释的都是政府在此项工程上的花费太少,因此正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/x01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
______permissiontoholdaChristmaspartyathome,Marystartedtomakepreparations.
______youhaveseenthingslikethesebeforedoesn’tmatter.
Morepeoplewilleatoutinrestaurants______theydotoday.
What’sthematter______theystillhaven’tansweredthetelegram?
Americawas______wasfirstcalled"India"byColumbus.
Whenyouchooseafreezer,rememberit’sprobablygoingtobewithyouforalongtime.Nosinglestyleorsizeisbest,soit’s
Run,Rabbits,RunFromGreenwichtotheMallisgoodsportforallInits13years,theLondonMarathonhasacquiredapedi
Up_____intotheairwhentheten-secondcountdownwasover.
Ascientistwhodoesresearchineconomicpsychologyandwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendtheirmoney
JeanWagner’smostenduringcontributiontothestudyofAfro-Americanpoetryishisinsistencethatit______inreligious,as
随机试题
阅读《国殇》中的一段诗句,回答问题:出不入兮往不反,平原忽兮路超远。带长剑兮挟秦弓,首身离兮心不惩。诚既勇兮又以武,终刚强兮不可凌。身既死兮神以灵,魂魄毅兮为鬼雄!概括这段诗句的大意。
根据研究发现,具有C型人格特征的人易患
贯穿于护理活动全过程的是
按照《建筑业企业资质管理规定》,建筑业企业资质证书有效期满未申请延续的,其资质证书将被()。
国际上实行增值税的国家对出口产品大多数采用零税率的做法,其主要作用有( )。
试点地区的纳税人向其他单位或者个人无偿提供交通运输业和部分现代服务业服务,由于没有取得收入,因此一律不属于应税劳务的范围。()
2014年1—6月,美国外商平均每月对A省直接投资约()万美元。
设函数并记试求F(x)及
Youradvicewouldbe______valuabletohim,whoisatpresentathiswit’send.
Whenonelooksbackthefifteenhundredyearsthatarethelifespanof1,______theEnglishlanguage,heshouldbeabletonoti
最新回复
(
0
)