首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
37
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
What is the main reason Envisat has NOT been maintained?
选项
A、Governments do not properly support these satellite projects financially.
B、Poor ethical and moral implications.
C、Political and idealogical conflict between member countries.
D、Technological capability has not been fully developed.
答案
A
解析
本题为归纳大意题。第六段中第一句话“But the main culprits are governments,which are spending too little on the job.”以及后文一直解释的都是政府在此项工程上的花费太少,因此正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/x01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Justasthesoilisapartoftheearth,______theatmosphere.
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout?
Run,Rabbits,RunFromGreenwichtotheMallisgoodsportforallInits13years,theLondonMarathonhasacquiredapedi
TheFlowerAuctionislocatedontheoutskirtsof
DivorceInarbitration,thedivorcecaseispresentedtoaneutralpartycalledanarbitratorwho,likeajudge,hasthepo
Homeowners:areyouawarethatthere’sanall-newelectronicinventioncalled"thebug"?Itissensitivetothesoundsofaburg
SEATTLE(Reuters)-Initsseconddtenteinasmanymonths,MicrosoftCorp.onFridaysaidithaspartneredwithlongtimerival
Thatexperiencesinfluencesubsequentbehaviorisevidenceofanobviousbutneverthelessremarkableactivitycalledremembering
TheMiddleEasthascalleda"museumofreligiousandlinguistichistory."TheoriginandgrowthoftheCoptsintheNilevalley
TheMiddleEasthascalleda"museumofreligiousandlinguistichistory."TheoriginandgrowthoftheCoptsintheNilevalley
随机试题
构成晶体的微观粒子(分子、原子或离子)按一定的几何规则排列,由此形成的最小单元称为()。
中毒后用胆碱酯酶复活剂解救效果较差或不明显,应以阿托品治疗为主的是
公开招标采用公告的形式发布,邀请招标采用投标邀请书的形式发布,体现了两者()不同。
根据《中华人民共和国公务员法》的规定,下列人员可被录用为公务员的是()。
“开始”菜单中的主要菜单项有()。
甲公司与丙公司签订一项资产置换合同,甲公司以其持有的联营企业30%的股权作为对价,另以银行存款支付补价100万元,换取丙公司生产的一大型设备,该设备的总价款为3900万元,该联营企业30%股权的取得成本为2200万元;取得时该联营企业可辨认净资产公允价
试述陈鹤琴的幼儿教育思想。
下列选项中,属于我国法律的非正式渊源的是()。
有的学者认为,“实学”即为“经世致用”之学。有的学者指出,“实学”本义为切实有用的学问,从体而言,为真实、实事,从用而言,则为实用、实行、实功、实效等,实学的本质特征是崇实黜实,具有儒学修己以治人的经世传统。一种较为流行的观点则认为,不能单从形而下层面把实
Herecomesthee-bookrevolutionA)Atwhattemperaturedoelectronicbookscatchfire?We’regoingtofindoutsometimethi
最新回复
(
0
)