首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
admin
2016-10-24
55
问题
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a list of the significant donors to the Conservative Party who had dined at No 10. By mid-morning, the Prime Minister had bowed to the pressure of the inevitable.and details of four dinners were duly released. Quite right, too.
Mr. Cameron claims to want to lead the most transparent and open government in the world. But the reality has been all too different, the most substantial progress is made only when the Prime Minister has a gun to his head.
Rules ensuring that ministers log all meetings with media executives, for example, were only put in place after the uproar over phone hacking had claimed the News of the World and led to the creation of the Leveson Inquiry. Given that the cozy relations between Government and media would unavoidably feature in the hearings, Mr. Cameron’s move was less a sign of a heartfelt commitment to openness than a pre-emptive strike(预防性打击).
Similarly, proposals to set up a register of lobbyists had all but stalled until this newspaper’s investigation revealed Bell Pottinger executives soliciting for business from a repressive government, boasting about their links with the Conservative high command and claiming that clients’ "messages" would get through to top advisers.
And it is only now—in an attempt to head off the scandal over Peter Crudda’s crude selling of access and influence—that Mr. Cameron has grudgingly revealed his dinner dates with major benefactors and set out rules that ministers meeting with party donors must report any discussions of policy to their Permanent Secretaries.
Mr. Cameron’s ill-judged uncommunicativeness alone would have added to suspicions of impropriety. But it is his supporters’ efforts to explain his reluctance——with false distinctions between public and private dinners, between meals and that take place in Downing Street or elsewhere, between public and private dinners, between those at Mr. Cameron’s expense and those not—that really make the case for complete openness in all matters relating to access to the Prime Minister.
A central claim is that the Downing Street flat is a private home and that any activities there should therefore be inviolable. The assertion is a ridiculous one. The flat is the residence of the British Prime Minister. It cannot be argued that simply because food is served upstairs rather than downstairs there is no cause for concern.
Quite the reverse, in fact. So long as large sums of money are changing hands, the implication of influence bought is unavoidable;even more so, if the meetings are informal. Indeed, the two-step over Mr. Cameron’s supper companions has only added to the sense of government-by-inner-group, of a blurred world of friendship and influence accessible to those with money to pay. It is up to the Prime Minister to dispel such damaging impressions forthwith.
Ultimately, there is but one remedy: take the big money out of politics. Previous attempts to cap donations have fallen foul of the three main parties’ inability to agree. But the Cruddas scandal may yet tip the balance, and Francis Maude, a senior Tory minister, yesterday announced plans for quick cross-party talks on reform.
In the meantime, it is obligatory upon Mr. Cameron to establish an immediate policy of absolute transparency. That means not simply a list of dinners with donors. It means every engagement of any kind must be put into the public domain. The sacrifice of his personal privacy is a small price to pay to guarantee the incorruptibility of the highest office of the land.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、dining with the Prime Minister is a risk to take
B、meeting with famous people should be planned in advance
C、the activities of public figures should be monitored by the public
D、a swift U-turn strategy is of significance to the Conservative Party
答案
C
解析
根据短文可以推断,公众人物的活动应该受到公众的监督。最后一段提到,公众人物的任何一次约会都必须在公众的视野当中。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/x3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Tocallthemusicofanothermusic-culture"primitive"is______one’sownstandardsonagroupthatdoesnotrecognizethem.
Motherstendtobetoo______towardstheirchildren.Theyshouldletthemseemoreoftheworld.
MostspeakersarenotusingthesecondlanguagealongsidethefirstAoneonadailybasis—instead,theinfluenceonthesecondl
Thepooroldmanwas______withdiabetesandwithoutpropertreatmenthewouldlosehiseyesightandbecomecrippledverysoon.
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Inthepast,Americancollegesanduniversitieswerecreatedtoserveadualpurposetoadvancelearningandtoofferachancet
Inthepast,Americancollegesanduniversitieswerecreatedtoserveadualpurposetoadvancelearningandtoofferachancet
Manyofthemostflexibleexamplesoftooluseinanimalscomefromprimates(theorderthatincludeshumans,apes,andmonkeys).
Despitethefactthattodayvirusareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandinplants,thereexistsagreatreluctancetoaccept
73.5percentofmajorU.S.firmsreportthattheyrecordandreviewtheiremployees’communicationsandactivitiesonthejob.
随机试题
假定氧气的热力学温度提高一倍,氧分子全部离解为氧原子,则氧原子的平均速率是氧分子平均速率的:
依据《中华人民共和国海洋环境保护法》,向海域排放含热废水,必须采取有效措施,保证邻近渔业水域的水温符合()。
国家可以通过调节利率高低来影响经济活动。一般认为,利率增加后带来的经济影响是()。
上海的城市管理新体制是()。
下列关于民族自治地方自治机关的自治权的说法中,错误的是()。
二人以上共同违反治安管理的,根据行为人在违反治安管理行为中所起的作用,分别处罚。()
企业国际营销战略有哪些基本类型?
因对微博的无知,某局长和某主任在微博上泄露个人隐私,暴露其不道德行为,受到有关部门的查处,有网友对他们的行为冷嘲热讽,感慨道:知识改变命运,没有知识也改变命运。以下哪项陈述最接近该网友所表达的意思?()
Stocksfinishedmixedinpost-holidaytradingyesterdayasWallStreetmeanderedthroughashortenedsession.(46)Themajorinde
A、Hedidn’tthinkitasuccess.B、Hewaslisteningtooattentivelytothespeakers.C、Hewaspuzzledbywhatthespeakerssaid.
最新回复
(
0
)