首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
admin
2016-10-24
90
问题
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a list of the significant donors to the Conservative Party who had dined at No 10. By mid-morning, the Prime Minister had bowed to the pressure of the inevitable.and details of four dinners were duly released. Quite right, too.
Mr. Cameron claims to want to lead the most transparent and open government in the world. But the reality has been all too different, the most substantial progress is made only when the Prime Minister has a gun to his head.
Rules ensuring that ministers log all meetings with media executives, for example, were only put in place after the uproar over phone hacking had claimed the News of the World and led to the creation of the Leveson Inquiry. Given that the cozy relations between Government and media would unavoidably feature in the hearings, Mr. Cameron’s move was less a sign of a heartfelt commitment to openness than a pre-emptive strike(预防性打击).
Similarly, proposals to set up a register of lobbyists had all but stalled until this newspaper’s investigation revealed Bell Pottinger executives soliciting for business from a repressive government, boasting about their links with the Conservative high command and claiming that clients’ "messages" would get through to top advisers.
And it is only now—in an attempt to head off the scandal over Peter Crudda’s crude selling of access and influence—that Mr. Cameron has grudgingly revealed his dinner dates with major benefactors and set out rules that ministers meeting with party donors must report any discussions of policy to their Permanent Secretaries.
Mr. Cameron’s ill-judged uncommunicativeness alone would have added to suspicions of impropriety. But it is his supporters’ efforts to explain his reluctance——with false distinctions between public and private dinners, between meals and that take place in Downing Street or elsewhere, between public and private dinners, between those at Mr. Cameron’s expense and those not—that really make the case for complete openness in all matters relating to access to the Prime Minister.
A central claim is that the Downing Street flat is a private home and that any activities there should therefore be inviolable. The assertion is a ridiculous one. The flat is the residence of the British Prime Minister. It cannot be argued that simply because food is served upstairs rather than downstairs there is no cause for concern.
Quite the reverse, in fact. So long as large sums of money are changing hands, the implication of influence bought is unavoidable;even more so, if the meetings are informal. Indeed, the two-step over Mr. Cameron’s supper companions has only added to the sense of government-by-inner-group, of a blurred world of friendship and influence accessible to those with money to pay. It is up to the Prime Minister to dispel such damaging impressions forthwith.
Ultimately, there is but one remedy: take the big money out of politics. Previous attempts to cap donations have fallen foul of the three main parties’ inability to agree. But the Cruddas scandal may yet tip the balance, and Francis Maude, a senior Tory minister, yesterday announced plans for quick cross-party talks on reform.
In the meantime, it is obligatory upon Mr. Cameron to establish an immediate policy of absolute transparency. That means not simply a list of dinners with donors. It means every engagement of any kind must be put into the public domain. The sacrifice of his personal privacy is a small price to pay to guarantee the incorruptibility of the highest office of the land.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、dining with the Prime Minister is a risk to take
B、meeting with famous people should be planned in advance
C、the activities of public figures should be monitored by the public
D、a swift U-turn strategy is of significance to the Conservative Party
答案
C
解析
根据短文可以推断,公众人物的活动应该受到公众的监督。最后一段提到,公众人物的任何一次约会都必须在公众的视野当中。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/x3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Humanbehaviorismostlyaproductoflearning,whereasthebehaviorofananimaldependsmainlyon______.
Insomecountrieswhereracialprejudiceisacute,violencehassocometobetakenforgrantedasameansofsolvingdifference
InChristianwritersitisnaturalthatlogicalexplanationsofthegenerallawofstormsshouldcenterabouttheDevil.Clement
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Chooseoneappropriatewordfromthefollowingwordbanktofillintheblanksnumberedfrom1to15inthepassagebelow.Chang
Scientistshaveacknowledgedthattointerpretananimal’sthoughtprocessesinasoundmannerrequiresaheavydoseoffromour
Inthepast,Americancollegesanduniversitieswerecreatedtoserveadualpurposetoadvancelearningandtoofferachancet
Chemistrydidnotemergeas:scienceuntilafterthescientificrevolutionin17thcenturyandthenonlyratherslowlyandlabor
Despitethefactthattodayvirusareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandinplants,thereexistsagreatreluctancetoaccept
Awisemanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevilisforgoodmentodonothing.So,asapoliceoffice
随机试题
知识产权
如果货物在空运单上约定的到达时间届满后()天内仍没到达,收货人便可以向承运人主张权利。
纳税人将自产、委托加工或者外购的货物用于集体福利或个人消费的,均视同销售,征收增值税。()
企业发生的财务费用,在编制现金流量表时,均应作为筹资活动项目反映。()
实施“中小学教师继续教育工程”应放在突出地位的有()。
叶圣陶、郑振铎等都是江浙人,有着江浙知识分子特有的理性和宽容。他们像朱自清一样,都是新文学的热心鼓吹者,写得一手漂亮的白话散文。他们接受过五四新文化的洗礼,______,无论对中西之学,都采取平和的一视同仁态度。填入横线上最恰当的是()。
债务人甲怠于行使其对乙的到期债权,对债权人丙造成损害的,债权人丙可以向人民法院请求以自己的名义代为行使债务人的债权。但债权人丙提起代位权诉讼,应当符合的条件不包括()。
中国共产党在马克思主义指导下,立足中国国情,走出以农村包围城市、武装夺取政权的新民主主义道路。这给我们的哲学启示是()。
下列关于隋唐时期货币表述准确的是()。①隋朝使用五铢钱②开元年间开始统一使用开元通宝③开元通宝是唐朝的通用货币④开元通宝是唐代以后历代王朝货币的范式
共同要素说强调以下哪种因素在学习中的作用?
最新回复
(
0
)