首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a
admin
2016-10-24
81
问题
Even by David Cameron’s standards, it was a swift U-turn. First thing yesterday, Downing Street was still refusing to publish a list of the significant donors to the Conservative Party who had dined at No 10. By mid-morning, the Prime Minister had bowed to the pressure of the inevitable.and details of four dinners were duly released. Quite right, too.
Mr. Cameron claims to want to lead the most transparent and open government in the world. But the reality has been all too different, the most substantial progress is made only when the Prime Minister has a gun to his head.
Rules ensuring that ministers log all meetings with media executives, for example, were only put in place after the uproar over phone hacking had claimed the News of the World and led to the creation of the Leveson Inquiry. Given that the cozy relations between Government and media would unavoidably feature in the hearings, Mr. Cameron’s move was less a sign of a heartfelt commitment to openness than a pre-emptive strike(预防性打击).
Similarly, proposals to set up a register of lobbyists had all but stalled until this newspaper’s investigation revealed Bell Pottinger executives soliciting for business from a repressive government, boasting about their links with the Conservative high command and claiming that clients’ "messages" would get through to top advisers.
And it is only now—in an attempt to head off the scandal over Peter Crudda’s crude selling of access and influence—that Mr. Cameron has grudgingly revealed his dinner dates with major benefactors and set out rules that ministers meeting with party donors must report any discussions of policy to their Permanent Secretaries.
Mr. Cameron’s ill-judged uncommunicativeness alone would have added to suspicions of impropriety. But it is his supporters’ efforts to explain his reluctance——with false distinctions between public and private dinners, between meals and that take place in Downing Street or elsewhere, between public and private dinners, between those at Mr. Cameron’s expense and those not—that really make the case for complete openness in all matters relating to access to the Prime Minister.
A central claim is that the Downing Street flat is a private home and that any activities there should therefore be inviolable. The assertion is a ridiculous one. The flat is the residence of the British Prime Minister. It cannot be argued that simply because food is served upstairs rather than downstairs there is no cause for concern.
Quite the reverse, in fact. So long as large sums of money are changing hands, the implication of influence bought is unavoidable;even more so, if the meetings are informal. Indeed, the two-step over Mr. Cameron’s supper companions has only added to the sense of government-by-inner-group, of a blurred world of friendship and influence accessible to those with money to pay. It is up to the Prime Minister to dispel such damaging impressions forthwith.
Ultimately, there is but one remedy: take the big money out of politics. Previous attempts to cap donations have fallen foul of the three main parties’ inability to agree. But the Cruddas scandal may yet tip the balance, and Francis Maude, a senior Tory minister, yesterday announced plans for quick cross-party talks on reform.
In the meantime, it is obligatory upon Mr. Cameron to establish an immediate policy of absolute transparency. That means not simply a list of dinners with donors. It means every engagement of any kind must be put into the public domain. The sacrifice of his personal privacy is a small price to pay to guarantee the incorruptibility of the highest office of the land.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、dining with the Prime Minister is a risk to take
B、meeting with famous people should be planned in advance
C、the activities of public figures should be monitored by the public
D、a swift U-turn strategy is of significance to the Conservative Party
答案
C
解析
根据短文可以推断,公众人物的活动应该受到公众的监督。最后一段提到,公众人物的任何一次约会都必须在公众的视野当中。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/x3GO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readingbooksisahabitthatispopularly【C1】______bymoreandmorepeople.Itbenefitsourlivesbyimprovingourknowledgeto
Schoolbuildingsthemselvescanreflectliberalorconservativeviewsaboutwhatshouldgooninaclassroom.Theearliestschoo
Schoolbuildingsthemselvescanreflectliberalorconservativeviewsaboutwhatshouldgooninaclassroom.Theearliestschoo
Morethan100______catsthatusedtoroamthestreetsinaChineseprovincehavenowbeencollectedandorganizedintoatramto
Forthispart,youareallowed45minutestowriteashortessayofabout300wordsfollowingthepicturegivenbelow:(1)Descri
Chemistrydidnotemergeas:scienceuntilafterthescientificrevolutionin17thcenturyandthenonlyratherslowlyandlabor
Despitethefactthattodayvirusareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandinplants,thereexistsagreatreluctancetoaccept
Awisemanoncesaidthattheonlythingnecessaryforthetriumphofevilisforgoodmentodonothing.So,asapoliceoffice
SomeuniversitiesandcollegesinChinarequiretheirPhDstudentstopublishresearchpapersinEnglish.Writeanessayofnol
Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:ReduceWasteonCampus.Youshouldwriteatle
随机试题
下列情况中,血浆D-二聚体测定结果正常的是
在应用建设工程数据库时,往往要对其中的数据进行适当的( )。
建筑耐火等级的选定与建筑高度、使用功能、重要性质和火灾扑救难度等要求一致。使用或储存特殊贵重的机器、仪表、仪器等设备或物品时,建筑耐火等级不应低于()级。
律师及其所在事务所在履行职责时可以根据行业公认标准和道德规范出具文件的验证。()
银行在汽车贷款业务开展中是独立作业的,与其他行业、单位无关。()
凡群众发现公安机关、公安民警有违法违纪或失职行为的,可以直接拨打“110”进行监督投诉。()
办公室有不节约的不良习惯,且领导早晚上下班都不怎么关灯,你应该怎么办?
依托于信息技术革命的网络社会改变了人们传统的空间和时间感受。空间和时间都不再是固定的,成为了“流动的空间”和“压缩的时间”。利用高速传播的音像信息,人们可以立刻进入到一个不同的空间,并参与其中;凭借强大的信息存储能力,不同时间发生的事情都能集中为同一个瞬间
Whenwillthemeetingbegin?
HowtoLearnLanguageSuccessfully【B1】______Theycanpickupnewvocabulary,masterrulesorgrammar,andlearntowritein
最新回复
(
0
)