首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
96
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Lookatthelistbelow.Itshowsthecontentspagefromadirectoryofbusinessservices.Forquestions6-10,decidewhichbusin
Readthearticlebelowaboutrelationshipwithcustomers.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswe
TheDevelopmentProgrammeManagementProcessAEstablishingareviewboardfordevelopmentsBEstablishingreviewcriteriaandm
Lookatthechartbelow.Itshowstheincome,totalexpenditureandadvertisingcostsofacompanyineightweeks.Whichweekdo
FeaturesofWarehouseManagementSystemWarehouseManagementSystemsaregainingimportancesimilartothatofothersoftwar
From:DistributionManagerTo:DistributionAssistantSubject:DeliveriesThisisFastway’sfirstmonthdeliveringourgoodstocor
Asoneworkswithcolorinapracticalorexperimentalway,oneisimpressedbytwoapparentlyunrelatedfacts.Colorasseenis
Thelanguagebarriermadecommunicationdifficult,butfinally,partofmymessage______.
AproposedRussianbanonEuropeanUnionmeatexportscouldjeopardizeRussia’saspirationstojointheWorldTradeOrganization
随机试题
《岳麓山爱晚亭联》:“山径晚红舒,五百夭桃新种得;峡云深翠点,一双驯鹤待笼来。”此联运用拟人的手法,生动形象地描绘出爱晚亭在深秋时节的美丽景象。()
患者病情危重,冷汗自出,四肢厥逆,脉微欲绝,应马上应用()。
根据《规划环境影响评价条例》的规定,环境影响篇章或者说明应当包括预防或者减轻不良环境影响的()等措施。
已知某新技术应用方案的投资额为100万元,年工程成本为20万元,基准投资收益率为12%,则该方案的折算费用为( )万元。
2005年韩国S公司为美国A公司的第一代产品提供闪存芯片,至2013年,S公司成为A公司最大的元器件和闪存供应商。对A公司而言,S公司为其设备提供32%的零部件,大大降低了制造成本。而S公司在与A公司的合作过程中,从技术的积累、学习到技术的革新,使其从专门
下列关于书面声明的说法中,正确的是()。
案例:阅读《祝福》教学实录片段,完成下列问题。一、故事导入1.在辛亥革命后的某一天,浙江绍兴鲁镇发生了一桩命案。据说是一个年轻的老妇人在新年祝福的时候死在了冰天雪地里。而有一个人正好见证了整桩命案的发生,于是便将他所知道的叙述
中央国家机构包括()。
A.Itisjustcleanerandsafer.B.youneedtotryaheatedeyelashcurler.C.theywillmakecleansingmucheasier.A:Howca
在Form1的窗体上绘制一个名为Text1的文本框,然后建立一个主菜单,标题为“操作”,名为vbOp,该菜单有两个菜单项,其标题分别为“显示”和“隐藏”,名称分别为vbDis和vbHide。编写适当的事件过程,使程序运行后;若单击“操作”菜单中的“显示”
最新回复
(
0
)