首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
admin
2017-12-08
59
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
[A] A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity.
[B] Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated (复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
[C] Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
[D] One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied (小众的) pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m-7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish (消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
[E] Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct. And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such fake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
[F] Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis (假设) are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
[G] The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
[H] All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing (基因组测序) into a flow of truly significant ones.
[I] Ideally, research protocols (草案) should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are. (It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.) Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
[J] The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
[K] Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some government funding agencies have already granted money to figure out how best to encourage replication.
选项
答案
J
解析
本题涉及对于目前学术问题的整治办法,可知答案应在If it’s broke,fix it标题下的内容查找。由government funding agencies和encourage replication可以定位到J段第2句。原文提到一些政府机构正着手研究如何鼓励复现已有的科研成果,题中的grant money对应原文的give out $30 billion,而figure out则对应work out,故可确定答案为J段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xka7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Thinkabouthowtoconnectpeoplearoundtheworld.B、Toattractlargenumberofinternationaltalenttogether.C、Discusshow
A、Toshowhowsimplethemechanicalaidsfordivingcanbe.B、Toprovidereasonsforhischangeablecharacter.C、Toexplorethe
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
A、Theywillexchangerings.B、Theywillexchangepresents.C、Theywillexchangepromises.D、Theywillexchangeflowers.C细节题。听录音
A、Wherethecountriesare.B、Howtomakeatravelaroundtheworld.C、Whathetoldaboutisquitetrue.D、Howtofindtheblack
随机试题
在考生文件夹下有一个“Acc3.mdb”数据库。(1)以“房产销售情况表”为数据源,创建“销售明细”窗体,在窗体中显示“房产销售情况表”的全部字段,文本框的特殊效果为“平面”。在窗体页眉中添加“销售信息明细”标签。标签文本格式为“宋体”、“12号”、“加
1根普通平带宽100mm、胶布层为6层、长15m,问这根平带的平方米数是多少?
患者,女性,38岁。风心病5年。超声心动图检查示二尖瓣中度狭窄。2个月前曾患感冒,当时发热1周。近1个月工作较劳累,经常出现夜间阵发性呼吸困难。目前体温正常,血、尿常规正常。应首选用下列哪种药物治疗
除以上体征外,护士若考虑该妇女怀孕,其另外的可能体征是该孕妇的预产期是
能与氢氧化钠溶液反应呈红色的化合物是
患者,女性,30岁。因外出春游去植物园,出现咳嗽、咳痰伴喘息1天入院。体检:体温36.5℃,脉搏90次/分钟,呼吸28次/分,血压110/80mmHg,喘息貌,口唇发绀,在肺部可闻及广泛哮鸣音。患者进一步表现为发绀明显、端坐呼吸、大汗淋漓,经一般解痉、
某重力式码头基础长200m,分两段施工,基槽开挖要求风化岩层以上的黏土及淤泥层要全部挖除,抛泥区距施工现场6km。该基床施工的主要工序为:基槽开挖、基床抛石、夯实、整平,每道工序只各安排一班作业,各工序工期分别为60d、15d、5d、20d。由于工作面受限
转移收入是指不是作为生产要素提供的劳务的报酬的收入,从而也是不能计入国民收入的收入,是来自非生产、交换过程的收入。根据上述定义,下列不属于转移收入的是:
在Access数据库中使用向导创建查询,其数据可以来自()。
Adolescentsaretakinglongertobecomefullyproductivemembersofsociety,ReedLarson,professorofhumandevelopment,Univer
最新回复
(
0
)