首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
admin
2017-12-08
61
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
[A] A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity.
[B] Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated (复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
[C] Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
[D] One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied (小众的) pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m-7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish (消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
[E] Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct. And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such fake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
[F] Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis (假设) are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
[G] The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
[H] All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing (基因组测序) into a flow of truly significant ones.
[I] Ideally, research protocols (草案) should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are. (It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.) Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
[J] The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
[K] Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some government funding agencies have already granted money to figure out how best to encourage replication.
选项
答案
J
解析
本题涉及对于目前学术问题的整治办法,可知答案应在If it’s broke,fix it标题下的内容查找。由government funding agencies和encourage replication可以定位到J段第2句。原文提到一些政府机构正着手研究如何鼓励复现已有的科研成果,题中的grant money对应原文的give out $30 billion,而figure out则对应work out,故可确定答案为J段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xka7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、TheypredominatetheEnglishworld.B、Theyareunabletoadapttothecompetitiveworld.C、Theyinvestmoretimeinlearninga
A、Thinkabouthowtoconnectpeoplearoundtheworld.B、Toattractlargenumberofinternationaltalenttogether.C、Discusshow
A、Toshowhowsimplethemechanicalaidsfordivingcanbe.B、Toprovidereasonsforhischangeablecharacter.C、Toexplorethe
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
Newresearchshowsthatchildrenbornafterunplannedpregnanciesdevelopmoreslowlythanchildrenwhoseparentshadplannedth
A、Theychangedtheirwaysoftalking.B、Theychangetoanothertopic.C、Theymadetheirwaytochoosethewallpaperthatisfavo
A、Hehasdifficultiesgoingonwithhisresearch.B、Hedoesn’tunderstandtheworkplacefriendshipC、Hehasn’treadanyliteratu
随机试题
“诗中有画”“画中有诗”形容的是谁的作品?()
有两个电容器,C1为200V、20μF,C2为250V、2μF,串联后接入400V直流电路中,可能出现的情况是()。
外国资本—帝国主义对近代中国的侵略方式主要有
下列软件中属于数据库管理系统的有________。
临床上判断心脏舒张功能最实用的方法是
关于原始凭证的填制,下列说法中正确的有()。
邓小平理论的科学体系包含的主要内容有()。
有50名学生参加联欢会,第一个到会的女生同每个男生握过手,第二个到会的女生只差1个男生没握过手,第三个到会的女生只差2个男生没握过手,如此等等,最后一个到会的女生和7个男生握过手,那么这50名学生中有几名男生?()
艺术衍生品是艺术作品衍生而来的艺术与商品的结合体,具备一定的艺术附加值。包括经艺术家亲笔签名且限量发行的专供收藏和欣赏的书籍等,印有艺术家代表作品的文具、生活用品、服装服饰以及与艺术元素相结合的具有收藏价值的产品等。根据上述定义,以下不属于艺术衍生品的是
(2016年第35题)结合材料回答问题:2015年1月1日,新环保法正式实施。2月底,环保部相关部门公开约谈L市主要领导。作为新环保法实施后第一个被约谈城市,L市的污染经媒体曝光后引发全国关注。重压之下,L市对57家污染大户紧急停产整顿,对412家重点污
最新回复
(
0
)