首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Marjorie McMillan, head of radiology at a veterinary hospital, found out by reading a letter to the editor in her local newspape
Marjorie McMillan, head of radiology at a veterinary hospital, found out by reading a letter to the editor in her local newspape
admin
2017-03-15
33
问题
Marjorie McMillan, head of radiology at a veterinary hospital, found out by reading a letter to the editor in her local newspaper. Pamela Goodwin, a labor-relations expert at General Motors, happened to see a computer printout. Stephanie Odle, an assistant manager at a Sam’s Club store, was slipped a co-worker’s tax form.
Purely by accident, these women learned they were making less than their male or, in Goodwin’s case, white colleagues at work. Each sued for pay discrimination under federal law, lucky enough to discover what typically stays a secret. "People don’t just stand around the watercooler to talk about how much they make," says McMillan.
This, as they say, is the real world, one in which people would rather discuss their sex lives than salaries. And about a third of private employers actually prohibit employees from sharing pay information. It is also a world that the US Supreme Court seems unfamiliar with. The Justices recently decided 5 to 4 that workers are out of luck if they file a complaint under Title VII—the main federal antidiscrimination law—more than 180 days after their salary is set. That’s six measly months to find out what your co-workers are making so that you can tell whether you’re getting chiseled because of your sex, race, religion or national origin.
How many of the roughly 2,800 such complaints pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will fizzle because of this new rule is hard to say. Less of a mystery, though just as troubling, is how the court reached its decision.
Lilly Ledbetter filed the case against Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. because at the end of a 19-year career, she was making far less than any of 15 men at her level. She argued that Goodyear violated Title VII every time it gave her a smaller paycheck. Her complaint was timely, she said, because she filed it within 180 days of her last check. But the court majority read the statute to mean that only an actual decision to pay Ledbetter less could be illegal, and that happened well outside the 180-day period.
A statute’s ambiguous wording is fair game, but why read it to frustrate Title VII’s purpose: to ease pay discrimination in a nation where women make only 770¢ on average for every $1 that men earn? And while employers might like this decision, they could end up choking on the torrent of lawsuits that might now come their way. "The real message is that if you have any inkling that you are being paid differently, you need to file now, before the 180 days are up," says Michael Foreman of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights.
All this sounds familiar. In June 1989, the Supreme Court issued three decisions that sharply limited the right to sue over employment discrimination. A day after the most prominent ruling, in Wards Cove v. Atonio, Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D., Ohio) declared that he would introduce a bill to overturn the decisions.
It took civil rights advocates and their congressional allies eight months to introduce legislation. President George H.W. Bush vetoed the first version, arguing that it would encourage hiring quotas. Finally, in late 1991, the Democratic Congress and the Republican President reached a compromise fashioned by Senators John Danforth (R., Mo.) and Edward Kennedy (D., Mass.). It became the Civil Rights Act of 1991 and overturned parts of eight high-court decisions.
Now, Foreman and others are working on a bill to overturn the Ledbetter case, and Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, among others, have expressed interest. A Democratic Congress may well cooperate, though with a Republican again in the White House, final legislation before next year’s elections isn’t guaranteed. In any event, we probably won’t see the kind of groundswell that shifted the law toward workers in 1991 because civil rights advocates aren’t sure these Justices are a threat to workers’ rights. Last June, for example, they made it harder for employers to retaliate against employees who complain of discrimination. That left the Ledbetter ruling looking particularly clueless. "I heard the decision and thought, What is wrong with this court?" says McMillan. "It just doesn’t live in the real world."
It can be implied from the passage that______.
选项
A、there will be a new law against pay discrimination in the near future
B、it is not very likely that laws could be dramatically shifted to the interests of the working population
C、civil right advocates will never give up until they succeed in overturning the Ledbetter case
D、the Democratic Congress may cooperate with a Republican in pushing a final legislation against pay discrimination
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xrSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Peoplestirredinthemorningandwentoutintotheyardandreturnedwhennightfell,forsheremainedfrozen.
Intheworstmassshootinginthecountry’shistory,morethantenpeoplediedanddozensofpeoplewerehitbybullet________an
InternetMarketingisfittinginwiththenewchangesofconsumingideasfortheregressionof________consumptionneeds.
Theeraofdividedgovernmentbegins,inauspiciously.Willthepresidentbeabletoseethewoodforthesubpoenas?Isuspectth
Theyaregenerallyseenasanti-competitiveandnecessitatinglegislationtoproscribethem,sincetheyalmostinvariablycreate
Whilethepresidentwas________hisspeech,about50protestorsdemonstratedinfrontoftheUSembassy,condemningtheUSmilita
A、itcreatedalargenumberofjobsforindividualsB、itcouldspeedupthebuildingofnewhousesdramaticallyC、itmeantmore
A、PrevalentDiseasesintheWorldB、DiseaseControlandPreventionC、Malaria--AFatalDiseaseD、Sub-SaharanAfricanChildrenC
A、Two.B、Three.C、Four.D、Five.C
A、Whatchemicalstearsarecomposedof.B、Whethercryingreallyhelpsusfeelbetter.C、Whysomepeopletendtocrymoreoftent
随机试题
行政许可申请人隐瞒有关情况或者提供虚假材料,申请属于直接关系公共安全、人身健康、生命财产安全事项的,在三年内不得再次申请该行政许可。()
磁力线上任一点的切线方向为这一点的磁场方向,即N极所指的方向。
有关心包腔的叙述,下列哪一项是错误的()
患者男,因上前牙牙龈反复出现瘘管,X线片显示根管钙化,经过多次正规治疗后无效,拟行根尖手术。手术切口设计中错误的是A.牙周组织的健康程度影响愈合B.切口下方必须有骨组织支持C.瓣膜蒂可小于游离端D.切口不应通过骨隆突E.切口边缘不能被撕裂
给初生雏鹅注射抗小鹅瘟病毒高免血清,属于()。
A.对称性多关节炎B.累及远端指间关节更明显C.负重关节症状明显,运动后痛D.抗双链DNA抗体阳性E.非对称性的下肢大关节炎以上为类风湿关节炎的关节炎特点的为
(2007年)国际海上运输合同的当事人在合同中选定我国某法院作为解决可能发生的纠纷的法院。关于此,下列哪一选项是错误的?()
下列地点可以列为国家级自然保护区的是()
根据下图,完成下面问题。
AHowtoUseaPaintingKnife使用画刀的方法Paintingwithaknifeisabitlikeputtingbutteronbreadandproducesquitea(1)resu
最新回复
(
0
)