首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
admin
2011-01-02
75
问题
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward. It would be a long, flat line until the late 16th or early 17th century, when it would start trending upward. Before then the fruits of productive labor were limited to a few elites — princes, merchants and priests. For most of humankind life was as the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes famously described it in 1651 — "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short". But as Hobbes was writing those words, the world around him was changing. Put simply, human beings were getting smarter.
People have always sought knowledge, of course, but in Western Europe at that time, men like Galileo, Newton and Descartes began to search systematically for ways to understand and control their environment. The scientific revolution, followed by the Enlightenment, marked a fundamental shift. Humans were no longer searching for ways simply to fit into a natural or divine order, but they were seeking to change it. Once people found ways to harness energy — using steam engines — they were able to build machines that harnessed far more power than any human or horse could ever do. And people could work without ever getting tired. The rise of these machines drove the Industrial Revolution, and created a whole new system of life. Today the search for knowledge continues to produce an ongoing revolution in the health and wealth of humankind.
If the rise of science marks the first great trend in this story, the second is its diffusion. What was happening in Britain during the Industrial Revolution was not an isolated phenomenon. A succession of visitors to Britain would go hack to report to their countries on the technological and commercial innovations they saw there. Sometimes societies were able to learn extremely fast, as in the United States. Others, like Germany, was benefited from starting late, leapfrogging the long-drawn-out process that Britain went through.
This diffusion of knowledge accelerated dramatically in recent decades. Over the last 30 years we have watched countries like Japan, Singapore, South Korea and now China grow at a pace that is three times that of Britain or the United States at the peak of the Industrial Revolution. They have been able to do this because of their energies and exertions, of course, but also because they cleverly and perhaps luckily adopted certain ideas about development that had worked in the West — reasonably free markets, open trade, a focus on science and technology, among them.
The diffusion of knowledge is the dominant trend of our time and goes well beyond the purely scientific. Consider the cases of Turkey and Brazil. If you had asked an economist 20 years ago how to think about these two countries, he would have explained that they were classic basket-case, Third World economies, with triple-digit inflation, soaring debt burdens, a weak private sector and snail’s-pace growth. Today they are both remarkably well managed, with inflation in single digits and growth above 5 percent. And this shift is happening around the world. From Thailand to South Africa to Slovakia to Mexico, countries are far better managed economically than they have ever been. Even in cases where political constraints make it difficult to push far-reaching reforms, as in Brazil, Mexico or India, governments still manage their affairs sensibly, observing the Hippocratic oath not to do any harm.
We are sometimes reluctant to believe in progress. But the evidence is unmistakable. The management of major economies has gotten markedly better in the last few years. Careful monetary policy has tempered the boom-and-bust economic cycles of the industrial world, producing milder recessions and fewer shocks. Every day one reads of a new study comparing nations in everything from Internet penetration to inflation. All these studies and lists are symbols of a learning process that is accelerating, reinforcing the lessons of success and failure. Call it a best-practice world.
I realize that the world I am describing is the world of the winners. There are billions of people, locked outside global markets, whose lives are still accurately described by Hobbes’s cruel phrase. But even here, there is change. The recognition of global inequalities is more marked today than ever before, and this learning is forcing action. There is more money being spent on vaccines and cures for diseases in Africa and Asia today than ever before in history. Foreign-aid programs face constant scrutiny and analysis. When things don’t work, we learn that, too, and it puts a focus either on the aid program or on local governments to improve.
This may sound overly optimistic. There are losers in every race, but let not the worries over who is winning and losing the knowledge race obscure the more powerful underlying dynamic: knowledge is liberating. It creates the possibility for change and improvement everywhere. It can create amazing devices and techniques, save lives, improve living standards and spread information. Some will do well on one measure, others on another. But on the whole, a knowledge-based world will be a healthier and richer world.
The caveat I would make is not about one or another country’s paucity of engineers or computers. These problems can be solved. But knowledge is not the same thing as wisdom. Knowledge can produce equally powerful ways to destroy life, intentionally and unintentionally. It can produce hate and seek destruction. Knowledge does not by itself bring any answer to the ancient Greek question "What is a Good Life?" It does not produce good sense, courage, generosity and tolerance. And most crucially, it does not produce the farsightedness that will allow us all to live together — and grow together — on this world without causing war, chaos and catastrophe. For that we need wisdom.
选项
答案
B
解析
态度题。文章主要都在谈论科学知识传播带来的好处,但是最后两段也提到了一些可能引发的问题,可见作者的态度总的来说是积极的,但是也有谨慎之处,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/y4lO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
DuringtheBritishCivilWar,thesupportersofthekingwascalled______.
Justas【1】______isfamousforthetango,soAmerican【1】______iswell-knownforjazz,atypicalAmericaninvention
Peopledonotanalyzeeveryproblemtheymeet.Sometimestheytrytorememberasolutionfromthelasttimetheyhadasimilarp
Thousandsofteachersattheelementary,secondary,andcollegelevelscantestifythattheirstudents’writingexhibitsatende
DidChinesesailorsreallydiscoverAmericabeforeColumbus?Anewexhibitionsetsthescene,presentingnew【1】_____.thatlends
Ifpolicymakershopetomakefasterprogressinimprovingeconomicperformance,reducingpoverty,andslowing 【M1】______
Ifpolicymakershopetomakefasterprogressinimprovingeconomicperformance,reducingpoverty,andslowing 【M1】______
Burnoutcomeswhentherealityoflifeislessthanourexpectations.Andithasbecomeacommonpsychologicalproblem.Schoo
DriversontheBasingstokeby-passusedtohavetheirattentiondivertedbyasignthatreadAMOMENT’SINATFENTIONCAUSESACCI
Itlookedlikeatypicalbusinessmeeting.Sixmen,neatlydressedinwhiteshirtsandtiesfiledintotheboardroomofasmall
随机试题
在检测环氧煤沥青防腐层厚度时,每根管应测()截面。
气短声低,喉中时有轻度哮鸣,痰多质稀色白,自汗,恶风,乏力倦怠,食少便溏,舌淡,苔白,脉细弱,宜选用
直径为d的实心圆轴受扭,若使扭转角减少一半,圆轴的直径需变为()。
《中华人民共和国环境影响评价法》中所称环境影响评价,是指对规划和建设项目实施后可能造成的环境影响进行分析、预测和评估,提出预防或者减轻不良环境影响的对策和措施,进行()的方法与制度。
在用户接入网中,()技术采用了回波抵消和自适应均衡技术延长基群信号传输距离。系统具有较强的抗干扰能力,对用户线路的质量差异有较强的适应性。
银行贷款筹资的特点是()。
下列各项可使用通报来处理的是()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 C第一组图中,前两幅图同为实线或同为虚线的部分在第三幅图中变为虚线;不同部分则变为实线。第二组图也符合这一规律,同为波浪线或同为折线的部分在第三幅图中变为一种线;不同部分则变成另一种线
设有下面4条路由:192.168.129.0/24、192.168.130.0/24、192.168.132.0/24和192.168.133/24,如果进行路由汇聚,能覆盖这4条路由的地址是(37)。
______littleraininthepastsixtydays,thegroundisdryandpeoplefeeluncomfortable.
最新回复
(
0
)