首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the
admin
2014-07-20
63
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman" , for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than /msn/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as; "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman" , "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "firefighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? Wrhat about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in " A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: " Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
What’s the difference between "postal worker" and "postman" according to the passage?
选项
A、The former is informal, the latter is formal.
B、The former is formal, the latter is informal.
C、They have the same usage.
D、Both of them is informal.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从第四段“You would be quite likely to read in the paper that‘Postalworkers are to receive a pay increase’.But‘Has the postman been?’would be mostlikely to be heard in informal conversation.”可以看出,postal worker是正式用法,常出现在报纸等书面文字中,而postman则是非正式用法,常用在口语中,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yPTK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Israeliarchaeologistshavediscoveredhumanremainsdatingfrom400,000yearsago,(1)______conventionalwisdomthatHomosapie
RecentsurveysshowthatalotofcollegestudentsdownloadpapersfromtheInternettosavethetroubleofdoingtheassignment
Afteracarefulinvestigation,thecommitteedecidedto______theoldhall.
Atleastsomeoftheweatherextremesbeingseenaroundtheworldareconsequencesofhuman-inducedclimatechangeandcanbeex
Whichofthefollowingpresentcontinuoustensesexpressesfutureaction?
Evertryandgetatwo-year-oldtopickuptrash?Thiswasourgoalthispastweekendonaglorious,clearSaturday,themorning
Whatdidthewomandoontheweekend?
Thesepeopleoncehadfameandfortune;now______islefttothemisutterpoverty.
ThecomposerssoonbegantowritemusicaldramasaboutBiblestories______inchurch.
随机试题
社会消费品零售总额的分类指标有哪些?
58岁,男,车祸伤3小时后送来急诊,检查发现骨盆骨折,左股骨干骨折,左胫腓骨骨折,体查:面色苍白,血压75/45mmHg首先的治疗措施是( )。
放射工作人员的年剂量当量是指一年内
下面哪种能够体现相畏
某一中等城市,经对周边县改区后扩大为大城市,根据地价管理的要求需作基准地价更新评估。现委托一土地评估机构进行评估。基准地价评估期为2004年1月1日。该机构在评估过程中调查了相关资料。就上述内容,回答以下小题的问题。划分土地级别后,测算级别地价
影响砌体结构抗压强度的主要因素有()。
杂费
焦碳(煤制)()
你觉得以前上学时用过的书,最好的处理方式是()。
包容性增长
最新回复
(
0
)