首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the
admin
2014-07-20
80
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language . It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman" , for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than /msn/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as; "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman" , "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "firefighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? Wrhat about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in " A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: " Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
What’s the difference between "postal worker" and "postman" according to the passage?
选项
A、The former is informal, the latter is formal.
B、The former is formal, the latter is informal.
C、They have the same usage.
D、Both of them is informal.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从第四段“You would be quite likely to read in the paper that‘Postalworkers are to receive a pay increase’.But‘Has the postman been?’would be mostlikely to be heard in informal conversation.”可以看出,postal worker是正式用法,常出现在报纸等书面文字中,而postman则是非正式用法,常用在口语中,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yPTK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Barbecuinghasbecomean【C1】______partofAmericanlife,asbarbecuegrillsarefoundinthemajorityofAmericanhomes.
Ourcompanydecidedto______thecontractbecauseanumberoftheconditionsinithadnotbeenmet.
【C1】______peopledon’twakeupinthemorning,combtheirhair,and【C2】______thefrontdoorand【C3】______theworldstage.ButBr
Topicsforcompositionshouldbe______totheexperiencesandinterestsofthestudents.(1997年考试真题)
______thereislittlewecandotochangethereality,wecannotbetotallyatthemercyoftheharshenvironment.
Israeliarchaeologistshavediscoveredhumanremainsdatingfrom400,000yearsago,(1)______conventionalwisdomthatHomosapie
WhatdoesthepassagetellusaboutAmericanrivers?
Suchcrimesmaybesocomplexthatmonthsoryearsgobybeforeanyone______them.
Throughouttheyears,musichasbeenacommonthreadthatunitesgenerationsandhadprovidedsocialcommentary,individualexpr
ACubandiplomatwasdeportedfromtheUnitedStateslastweekendfor______.
随机试题
福特汽车公司在早期的发展中,创造性地开发出流水线生产方式。流水线的发明使汽车成本大大降低,因此,福特公司当时生产的汽车成为“大量生产、大量销售”时代的代表。上述案例体现了()
女性,28岁。主因发现左腹壁肿物2年入院。查左下腹壁肿物,约6cm×4cm大小,边界尚清,质硬,活动差。B超示腹壁腹直肌内低回声实性肿物
下列何药为治疗心火亢盛之心神不安、惊悸失眠之要药
中外合资经营企业的最高权力机构是( )。
万华公司2012年共实现税前收入总额1800万元,其中包括产品销售收入1600万元,国库券利息收入200万元。发生各项成本费用共计1250万元,其中:合理的工资薪金总额175万元,业务招待费90万元,职工福利费45万元,职工教育经费3万元,工会经费9万元。
党政机关行文关系有()。
()自尊是自我意识中具有评价意义的情感成分。
辛亥革命前在资产阶级革命思想的传播过程中,著名的著作有()
Thesedayswearesoaccustomedtotelegraphmessages(31)itishardforustoimaginetheexcitementthatwasfeltinthenine
We【C1】______upacamerafortheveryfirsttime.Wesnapsomepictures.【C2】______them,andletfamilymembersoohandaahov
最新回复
(
0
)