首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip t
admin
2013-02-16
68
问题
Is this happening in your neighborhood? Children, notebook computers stuck under their arms, await the yellow bus for the trip to middle school. On the surface, the question of computers in schools is a no-brainer. It would be strange to insist that today’s technology shouldn’t be used to make the classroom experience more individualized, more effective, more immediate, more exciting. Computers have been in schools more than 20 years — and probably even done some good.
But the idea of a personal computer as a necessary daily tool for every American grammar school pupil is altogether different thing. Beware the superficially attractive vision of 10-year-olds doing most of their work — and homework — on a computer. It’s another illusory silver bullet that promises to solve all of society’s ills through technology. Regardless of whether parents or taxpayers buy the machinery, it’s a bad policy.
Determining the proper role of computers in schools is too important to be left to computer suppliers and educators. An educated public with clear and realistic expectations needs to help determine the right track for technology.
Educators forever seem to seek the ultimate in curricular or teaching tools. They are always preoccupied with innovation — junior high school, new math, whole language, open classrooms and mastery learning, to name a few. Some ideas turned out well and over time have earned permanent positions in our education systems. Other reflected change for changes’ sake and wound up in the trash bin, where they belong.
Exactly what is to be solved with computers in schools? Are we looking to improve instructional capacity and flexibility? Are we trying to make teachers and aides more productive by letting students take advantage of programmed learning tools? This all sounds good, and much has been accomplished with computer-assisted instruction.
But that’s not the same as making the computer a symbol of well-tempered educational policy. There’s danger in the message that a child is not fully educated if he or she can’t surf the World Wide Web skillfully, move around in Windows or the Founder, use a word processing program, or program in Logo or Basic.
These skills can be learned outside the classroom. Worse, the time it takes students to acquire them is time stolen from the legitimate teaching schedule — and that’s a bad trade.
And what kind of computers should be purchased? We’re not talking brand names. Most school systems don’t have the money to replace PCs or Macs on the two-to-three-year cycle that shifts technologies demand. On the other hand, $2, 500 — the cost of just one computer — invested in books for the school library produces an asset that has, shall we say, a longer shelf life.
And who changes the factory culture of schoolrooms to allow computers to be more effective? And who teaches the teachers? These are the really tough issues — the ones that more hardware won’t solve.
Children are best served when schools contribute to shaping the solid foundations on which their future will be built. The student who can read with curiosity and understanding, who has mastered basic mathematical concepts, who can evaluate ideas critically, is the one schools should aim to produce.
Who can determine the proper role of computers in schools?
选项
A、Computer suppliers.
B、Computer educators.
C、The educated public.
D、All of the above.
答案
D
解析
根据文章第三段“Determining the proper role of computers in schools is too important to beleft to computer suppliers and educators.An educated public with clear and realistic expectations needs tohelp determine the right track for technology.”可知,判断电脑在学校的作用对电脑供应商和教育者们来说都是不容忽视的问题。满怀清晰而又现实的期望的开明公众需要参与帮助判断技术的正确用途。据此判断,答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yUmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Debbieisadivorceewholiveswithherchildren.Sheworksinadoctor’sofficeandenjoysthecontactwithpeople.Herson,J
Howeverimportantwemayregardschoollifetobe,thereisnogainsayingthefactthatchildrenspendmoretimeathomethani
Theoldcoupledecidedto_____aboyandagirlthoughtheyhadthreechildrenoftheirown.
It’sbeenanextraordinarilybadweekforApple,thewell-knownAmericanmanufacturerofcomputersandsoftware.Intheirquarte
It’sbeenanextraordinarilybadweekforApple,thewell-knownAmericanmanufacturerofcomputersandsoftware.Intheirquarte
It’sbeenanextraordinarilybadweekforApple,thewell-knownAmericanmanufacturerofcomputersandsoftware.Intheirquarte
随机试题
精囊睾丸
A.合欢皮B.酸枣仁C.远志D.琥珀E.磁石既能活血散瘀,又能镇惊安神的药物是()
下列关于派许加权指数的计算中,错误的是()。
下列各项中,不符合消费税有关规定的是( )。
甲、乙、丙三位自然人出资设立A有限责任公司,公司初步拟定的章程部分内容为:公司注册资本8万元;公司不设股东会、董事会和监事会,甲为公司执行董事兼公司监事,乙为总经理。公司成立后,发生以下事项:(1)A公司拟作为唯一股东出资9万元设立B一人有限责任公司,专
2013年10月23日—24日,由科技部信息中心主办,上海市科技信息中心承办的部分省市科技信息服务部门电子政务工作研讨会在上海召开。科技部信息中心主任胡晓军、上海市科委巡视员徐美华出席了会议。会议围绕贯彻落实党的十八大精神,进一步推动全国科技信息
如果新产品打开了销路,则本企业今年就能实现转亏为盈。只有引进新的生产线或者对现有设备实行有效的改造,新产品才能打开销路。本企业今年没能实现转亏为盈。如果上述断定是真的,则以下哪项也一定是真的?I.新产品没能打开销路。Ⅱ.没引进新的生产线。Ⅲ.对现有设
已知线性方程组(Ⅰ)线性方程组(Ⅱ)的基础解系ξ1=[-3,7,2,0]T,ξ2=[-1,-2,0,1]T.求方程组(Ⅰ)和(Ⅱ)的公共解.
Mr.Browntoldhissonthat______.Whatwasburnt?
Thereisvirtuallynolimittohowonecanservecommunityinterests,fromspendingafewhoursaweekwithsomecharitableorga
最新回复
(
0
)