2. 考研
  3. Emily wanted to see other people. Stuart had enjoyed a string of short-term relationships but realized that he needed more commi

Emily wanted to see other people. Stuart had enjoyed a string of short-term relationships but realized that he needed more commi

admin2019-08-08  24
问题    Emily wanted to see other people. Stuart had enjoyed a string of short-term relationships but realized that he needed more commitment. After years of uncertainty and making do, Fiona decided to follow her heart. Most found the decision emotional and stressful and felt guilty. Some worried that they were being superficial—but freely admitted they were leaving for the money.
   The stress of ending their relationship with an academic research career was difficult for these young scientists and others. Most of them, after a while, realized that they had made the right decision. Still, a few later regretted what they decided had been a toohasty exit, and wanted to patch things up. Such is life.
   【F1】Most importantly, all these people believe that they have learned from the experience and want to help others—people like you—who might be experiencing or considering a break-up. Their advice is the same as that offered by friends, family and advice columnists for centuries: if you’re not happy, then it’s not right.
   【F2】Produced by the Careers Research and Advisory Centre in Cambridge, UK, with help from others, the report What Do Research Staff Do Next? analyses survey responses of hundreds of former full-time academic researchers from across Europe who left to pursue other careers. Forget the redundant cliches. These were no "failures" or people who "couldn’t cope with the pace". More than three-quarters of them had published as a principal author and one-fifth had published a paper in a high-impact journal. One-quarter had managed to secure a competitive grant.
   Nor were they wide-eyed youngsters, rudely put in their place by the reality of the workplace. Most were in their thirties and almost one-third had a decade’s experience. 【F3】They changed their minds for three main reasons: they wanted better long-term prospects, they wanted more job security and they were no longer prepared to be employed on short-term and fixed contracts.
   In most cases, they got what they wanted. More than four in five were satisfied in their new jobs. Many had managed to stay in touch with science, and worked in a related function such as administration, outreach or publishing.
   Science should wish them well.【F4】As Nature has pointed out a regular flow of bright highly trained and scientifically literate workers heading into the wider world can only benefit society and science. 【F5】It is time to normalize these sideways steps, and for universities, senior scientists and research funders to accept and embrace the different paths that young researchers choose to follow. In most cases, the survey shows that these scientists were not forced out: they made an active choice to head elsewhere. And the outside world was delighted to have them.
【F4】
选项
答案就像《自然》杂志所说，这些受过高等教育、有着科研背景的精英们走到“外面的世界”去只会对社会和科学界有益。
解析 ①本句是复合句。主句是较简单的主谓宾结构，介词短语of bright，highly trained and scientifically literate workers作后置定语修饰flow，bright在这里不是“明亮”的意思，它可以用来形容人很聪明、有智慧；literate是指“有文化的”；scientifically修饰literate，字面理解是“在科学领域有文化”，其实意思就是“科学专业出身、有科研背景”。②heading into the wider world作后置定语修饰workers，其中head作动词表示“去某个地方”；wider world是比喻科研领域以外的其他领域；a flow of workers heading into the wider world就是“这些科研人员从科研领域转到其他领域”的意思。③can only benefit表示“只会对……有利(不会有弊)”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yW2Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)