首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished
admin
2015-10-21
47
问题
When the late Isaiah Berlin was knighted, a friend joked that the honour was for his services to conversation. The distinguished theorist of liberalism was indeed a brilliant talker and feline gossip. Readers of Berlin’s letters will find that same bubbling flow of malice, wit and human insight on the written page.
A first set of letters came out five years ago. To coincide with Berlin’s centenary year—he lived from 1909 to 1997—his literary executor, Henry Hardy, and a team of co-editors have now brought out a second fat volume. The verbal pressure is higher still, for in 1949 Berlin began dictating to a machine.
Biographically the letters take the reader through Berlin’s professional ascent from clever young don to Oxford professor, public educator and transatlantic academic star. They track the consolidation of his social position as an intellectual jewel of the post-war British establishment. Three or four footnotes a page introduce perhaps 1,000 or more politicians, public servants, academics, musicians and socialites whom Berlin knew or talked about. For that alone, his letters are a unique record of a bygone milieu.
Berlin did not write on oath. He ladles praise on correspondents only to dismiss them in letters to others as gorgons or third-raters. During the Suez crisis in 1956 he writes to the wife of the Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden, that her husband has shown "great moral splendour". The next letter, to Berlin’s stepson at Harvard, calls the British action "childish folly". His capsule judgments are sometimes apt, sometimes sneering. He calls Sir Peter Strawson, an eminent contemporary philosopher, provincial. Berlin is sharper still on his own thin-skinned self. He belittles his large philosophical gifts, finds publication an agony and worries to correspondents that his work is rot.
Mr. Hardy says that these letters represent perhaps a fourth of those Berlin wrote in 1946-1960. There are none back to him. So here is Berlin in his own ironical voice, as selected by editors. A reader only of these letters may well ask why Berlin had such grateful pupils and devoted friends. And why was he among the foremost liberal thinkers of the age? A selection of old and new tributes, The Book of Isaiah, also edited by the tireless Mr. Hardy, partly answers both questions.
Thinkers such as John Rawls defended liberal principles with more argument. Among historians of ideas, Quentin Skinner did more to professionalise their discipline. No one had Berlin’s gift for dramatising and personalising abstract ideas.
Berlin kept returning to three core convictions. Freedom from constraint by others(negative liberty)is more urgent or basic, he argued, than freedom to realise your potential(positive liberty). The left distrusted that distinction and the right misappropriated it, while philosophers continue to pick it over. He thought, secondly, that liberalism fails if it cannot validate the universal need to belong.
But perhaps Berlin’s strongest conviction was that the basic commitments—to friendship and truth, fairness and liberty, family and achievement, nation and principle—clash routinely and cannot be smoothly reconciled. Thinkers and politicians should admit the conflicts, Berlin implied, and not blanket them with doctrine or tyrannically attempt to subordinate some concerns to others.
The first two of those ideas crop up here and there in these letters. In personal form, that third conviction—that people are to be taken in full, not in formulae—runs throughout, and was surely one source of Berlin’s charm. More volumes of letters are to follow. Readers will wonder what self-mocking Berlin would have made of this growing monument. He was an erudite wit at the dinner table and, as the reader now sees, in his letters. But he was a thinker first, and for his thought there is no substitute for his essays.
The author probably would NOT describe Berlin as a______.
选项
A、sarcastic man
B、modest man
C、arrogant man
D、sophisticated man
答案
C
解析
态度题。第四段用英国首相安东尼-艾登爵士的例子具体说明伯林在信中不乏对他人的辛辣讽刺。第五段首句指出伯林非但不为自己的成就感到自鸣得意,反而非常苛刻地评价自己,因此他是个极端谦虚的人。第四段表明伯林对同样的人在当面和背后会做出不同的评价。可见,他是个有城府的人,第十段也指出伯林认为人是复杂的,充满各种矛盾,不能简单地当作公式或原则,而他对这一信念身体力行。因此[A]、[B]和[D]三个形容词都比较符合伯林的个性特点。尽管伯林对他人尖刻嘲讽,但从第五段来看,他是个极端谦虚的人,并非狂妄自大,最后一段也表明他可能对自己的著述采取“self-mocking”(自嘲)的态度,因而[C]符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yXKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
StudentsinAustraliabetweentheagesof6and15canenjoy______education.
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts. 【1】_________InAmerica,moneysupplycon
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Self-discipline:theFoundationofProductiveLivingI.Issuestobenoticedatthethoughtofself-disciplineATroublesforso
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
Why,youmaywonder,shouldspidersbeourfriends?Becausetheyprotectsomanyinsects,andinsectsinclude【M1】_____
随机试题
在保证获取必要的诊断资料前提下,采取措施错误的是
金瓷结合界面处理恰当与否关系到金瓷结合强度,因此严格的进行正确的处理才能保证PFM冠的质量。PFM基底冠在预氧化处理中不正确的是A.非贵金属在烤瓷炉内真空状态下加热形成氧化膜B.贵金属在炉内半真空状态下加热形成氧化膜C.巴非贵金属在炉内非真空状态
经产母牛,表现持续而强烈的发情行为,体重减轻。直肠检查发现卵巢为圆形,有突出于表面的直径约2.5cm的结构,触诊该突起感觉壁薄。2周后复查,症状同前该牛可能发生的疾病是()。
在人身保险合同中,( )不得被指定为受益人。
对于二手房个人住房贷款,银行的最主要合作单位是房地产经纪公司。()
根据供求规律,均衡产量与需求之间的关系呈()。
国有独资企业、国有独资公司和国有资本控股公司、国有资本参股公司的主要负责人,应当接受依法进行的任期经济责任审计。
每个学期,学校都会通过会考来评价学生的学习情况,这属于()。
格鲁克歌剧的改革措施是什么?
Olderpeoplemustbegivenmorechancestolearniftheyaretocontributetosocietyratherthanbeafinancialburden,accordi
最新回复
(
0
)