首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Answer Questions 71 to 80 by referring to the four articles on the topic " Does the free market erode character?" written by fou
Answer Questions 71 to 80 by referring to the four articles on the topic " Does the free market erode character?" written by fou
admin
2014-06-20
89
问题
Answer Questions 71 to 80 by referring to the four articles on the topic " Does the free market erode character?" written by four experts on the following pages. Answer each question by choosing A, B, CorDand mark it on ANSWER SHEET 1.
Note: When more than one answer is required, these may be given in any order. Some choices may be required more than once.
A = John Gray
B = Ayaan Hirsi
C = Qinglian He
D = Michael Walzer
Which author(s)believe(s)that the free market
A
John Gray
Free markets erode some aspects of character while enhancing others. Whether the result is good, on balance, depends on how one envisions a good life. Much also depends on whether one believes other economic systems can do better. The question can only be answered by comparing realistic alternatives and by understanding how different systems promote divergent types of human character.
In real time, free markets rarely work according to the models constructed by economists. There are booms and bubbles, busts and crashes. It is only in economics textbooks that markets are self-regulating. Against this background, the relation between economics and ethics can be seen more clearly. The traits of character most rewarded by free markets are entrepreneurial boldness, the willingness to speculate and gamble, and the ability to seize or create new opportunities. It is worth noting that these are not the traits most praised by conservative moralists. Prudence, thrift, and the ability to press on patiently in a familiar pattern of life may be admirable qualities, but they do not usually lead to success in the free market.
B
Ayaan Hirsi
There is little consensus on what is moral, let alone on what erodes morality. A man of faith measures moral character by one’s ability to abide by the demands of his God. A socialist might measure moral strength by one’s dedication to the redistribution of wealth. A liberal—by which I mean a classical, Adam Smith or Milton Friedman liberal, not a liberal in its American meaning of "pro-big government"—might be religious, and he might see the merits of income equality, but he will always put freedom first. This is the moral framework to which I subscribe.
According to this school of thought, freedom of the individual is the highest aim, and the ultimate test of a person’s character is his ability to pursue his own chosen goals in life without infringing upon the freedom of others to pursue their own goals. From this perspective, free economic activity among individuals, corporations, and nations boosts such desirable qualities as trust, honesty, and hard work. Producers are compelled to continually improve their goods and services. The free market establishes a meritocracy and creates opportunities for better jobs for those students who work hard at school. The same mechanism pushes parents to invest more time and money in the education of their children. Producers invest in research and innovation to beat their competitors in the marketplace.
C
Qinglian He
Over the past several centuries, the world has seen the many ways in which an active free market spurs material and social progress while at the same time strengthening moral character. By contrast, people who have lived under the free market’s primary modern rival, the ideologically-driven planned economy of state socialism, have suffered as economic performance stagnated, civil society withered, and morality was eroded. In recent decades, as planned economies collapsed under their own contradictions, this Utopian experiment has proved to be a systematic failure. Citizens who had endured long years of economic, moral, and political disaster were eager to get rid of them.
Of course, the market economy is not a perfect system. But the market’s flaws stem from the actions and motivations of its human participants rather than from its design. Experience has taught us that a free market is closely associated with a free society. And in free societies, people are better able to act in concert to improve their lives. Free societies afford people the opportunity to make their own political and social systems more just. In general, these activities support rather than erode morality.
D
Michael Walzer
Competition in the market puts people under great pressure to break the ordinary rules of decent conduct and then to produce good reasons for doing so. It is these rationalizations—the endless self-deception necessary to meet the bottom line and still feel okay about it—that erode moral character. But this isn’t in itself an argument against the free market. Think about the ways that democratic politics also erodes moral character. Competition for political power puts people under great pressure—to make promises they can’t keep, to take money from shady characters, to compromise principles that shouldn’t be compromised. All this has to be defended somehow, and moral character doesn’t survive the defense—at least, it doesn’t survive intact. But these obvious flaws don’t constitute an argument against democracy.
To be sure, economic and political competition also produce cooperative projects of many different sorts—partnerships, companies, parties, unions. Within these projects, empathy, mutual respect, friendship, and solidarity are developed and reinforced. People learn the give-and-take of collective deliberation. They stake out positions, take risks, and forge alliances. All these processes build character. But because the stakes are so high, participants in these activities also learn to watch and distrust one another, to conceal their plans, to betray their friends. They become "characters" in familiar stories of corporate corruption, political scandal, defrauded stockholders, and deceived voters.
选项
A、
B、
C、
D、
答案
B
解析
题目问的是“谁认为自由市场会给那些有能力和智慧的人带来更好的机会?”。根据问句中的关键词“provide better op—portunities”可以把答案定位在B篇中,其中第二段的第五、六句“The same mechanism pushes parents to invest more time and mon—ey in the education of their children.Producers invest in researchand innovation to beat their competitors in the marketplace.”做了说明,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yfXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Impatiencecharacterizesyoungintellectualworkers.Theywanttomaketheirmark(31).Soit’simportanttoget(32)tothemin
Youaregoingtospeakataninternationalconferencethatfocuseson"Whoshouldberesponsiblefortheoldpeople?"Sinceyour
AnswerQuestionsbyreferringtothearticleaboutmobilephonesinthefollowingmagazinearticle.A=NokiaB=Ericss
AnswerQuestionsbyreferringtothedescriptionsoffourkindsofsports.Note:Whenmorethanoneanswerisrequired,thes
Itissuggestedthatthewordmodernis______today.Whyareacceptanceorrejectiontheonlypossibleattitudestowardsmoder
Thereisadifferencebetweenscienceandtechnology.Scienceisamethodofansweringtheoretical(31);technologyisamethod
Thereisadifferencebetweenscienceandtechnology.Scienceisamethodofansweringtheoretical(31);technologyisamethod
Weunderstandfromthepassagethatmost18th-centurysculpturewas______.TheauthorsaysJohnsonfounditverydifficultto
WhatdidSelouswanttobewhenhewasyoung?
WhatdidSelouswanttobewhenhewasyoung?
随机试题
WhichofthefollowingisnotqualitynewspaperinBritain?()
简述管理者的分类。
磁共振现象为成像技术提供了一种全新思路:将人体置于特殊磁场中,用无线电射频脉冲激发人体内氢原子核,引起氢原子核共振,并吸收能量;在停止射频脉冲后,氢原子核按特定频率发出射电信号,并将吸收的能量释放出来,被人体外的接收器收录,经电子计算机处理获得图像。
市残疾人联合会和市牙防组针对全市5千多名残疾儿童的口腔保健现状,拟订了改进方案以促进口腔预防保健工作,考虑到残疾人丧失或部分丧失了自我口腔保健能力和本市发展现状。口腔专业人员应该为残疾人
虚劳的治疗原则为
常采用柱和屋架构成体系作为其承重骨架的建筑称之为()建筑。
红星中学高二年级在本次期末考试中竞争激烈,年级前7名的三科(语文、数学、英语)平均成绩构成公差为1的等差数列;第7、8、9名的平均成绩既构成等差数列,又构成等比数列。张龙位列第10,与第9名相差1分;张龙的英语成绩为121分,但老师
过失是指违反治安管理行为的主体应当预见自己的行为会构成违反治安管理的事实,但由于疏忽大意而没有预见,或者已经预见而轻信能够避免的心理态度。()
Costsshouldbecut;______,thenumberofstaffpositionswillbereduced.
Readingisanimportantskillthatneedstobedevelopedinchildren.Notonlyisitnecessaryfor【C1】______intheworldofscho
最新回复
(
0
)