首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. Pottery pr
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. Pottery pr
admin
2015-01-05
54
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
Pottery production in ancient Akrotiri
Excavations at the site of prehistoric Akrotiri, on the coast of the Aegean Sea, have revealed much about the technical aspects of pottery manufacture, indisputably one of the basic industries of this Greek city. However, considerably less is known about the socio-economic context and the way production was organised.
The bulk of pottery found at Akrotiri is locally made, and dates from the late fifteenth century BC. It clearly fulfilled a vast range of the settlement’s requirements: more than fifty different types of pots can be distinguished. The pottery found includes a wide variety of functional types like storage jars, smaller containers, pouring vessels, cooking pots, drinking vessels and so on, which all relate to specific activities and which would have been made and distributed with those activities in mind. Given the large number of shapes produced and the relatively high degree of standardisation, it has generally been assumed that most, if not all, of Akrotiri pottery was produced by specialised craftsmen in a non-domestic context. Unfortunately neither the potters’ workshops nor kilns have been found within the excavated area. The reason may be that the ceramic workshops were located on the periphery of the site, which has not yet been excavated. In any event, the ubiquity of the pottery, and the consistent repetition of the same types in different sizes, suggest production on an industrial scale.
The Akrotirian potters seem to have responded to pressures beyond their households, namely to the increasing complexity of regional distribution and exchange systems. We can imagine them as full-time craftsmen working permanently in a high production-rate craft such as pottery manufacture, and supporting themselves entirely from the proceeds of their craft. In view of the above, one can begin to speak in terms of mass-produced pottery and the existence of organised workshops of craftsmen during the period 1550-1500 BC. Yet, how pottery production was organised at Akrotiri remains an open question, as there is no real documentary evidence. Our entire knowledge comes from the ceramic material itself, and the tentative conclusions which can be drawn from it.
The invention of units of quantity and of a numerical system to count them was of capital importance for an exchange-geared society such as that of Akrotiri. In spite of the absence of any written records, the archaeological evidence reveals that concepts of measurements, both of weight and number, had been formulated. Standard measures may already have been in operation, such as those evidenced by a graduated series of lead weights— made in disc form—found at the site. The existence of units of capacity in Late Bronze Age times is also evidenced, by the notation of units of a liquid measure for wine on excavated containers.
It must be recognised that the function of pottery vessels plays a very important role in determining their characteristics. The intended function affects the choice of clay, the production technique, and the shape and the size of the pots. For example, large storage jars (pithoi)would be needed to store commodities, whereas smaller containers would be used for transport. In fact, the length of a man’s arm limits the size of a smaller pot to a capacity of about twenty litres; that is also the maximum a man can comfortably carry.
The various sizes of container would thus represent standard quantities of a commodity, which is a fundamental element in the function of exchange. Akrotirian merchants handling a commodity such as wine would have been able to determine easily the amount of wine they were transporting from the number of containers they carried in their ships, since the capacity of each container was known to be 14-18 litres. (We could draw a parallel here with the current practice in Greece of selling oil in 17 kilogram tins.)
We may therefore assume that the shape, capacity, and, sometimes decoration of vessels are indicative of the commodity contained by them. Since individual transactions would normally involve different quantities of a given commodity, a range of ’standardised’ types of vessel would be needed to meet traders’ requirements.
In trying to reconstruct systems of capacity by measuring the volume of excavated pottery, a rather generous range of tolerances must be allowed. It seems possible that the potters of that time had specific sizes of vessel in mind, and tried to reproduce them using a specific type and amount of clay. However, it would be quite difficult for them to achieve the exact size required every time, without any mechanical means of regulating symmetry and wall thickness, and some potters would be more skilled than others. In addition, variations in the repetition of types and size may also occur because of unforeseen circumstances during the throwing process. For instance, instead of destroying the entire pot if the clay in the rim contained a piece of grit, a potter might produce a smaller pot by simply cutting off the rim. Even where there is no noticeable external difference between pots meant to contain the same quantity of a commodity, differences in their capacity can actually reach one or two litres. In one case the deviation from the required size appears to be as much as 10-20 percent.
The establishment of regular trade routes within the Aegean led to increased movement of goods; consequently a regular exchange of local, luxury and surplus goods, including metals, would have become feasible as a result of the advances in transport technology. The increased demand for standardised exchanges, inextricably linked to commercial transactions, might have been one of the main factors which led to the standardisation of pottery production. Thus, the whole network of ceramic production and exchange would have depended on specific regional economic conditions, and would reflect the socio-economic structure of prehistoric Akrotiri.
What does the writer say about items of pottery excavated at Akrotiri?
选项
A、There was very little duplication.
B、They would have met a big variety of needs.
C、Most of them had been imported from other places.
D、The intended purpose of each piece was unclear.
答案
B
解析
PARAGRAPH 2 ’The pottery found includes a wide variety of functional types like storage jars, smaller containers, pouring vessels, cooking pots, drinking vessels and so on, which all relate to specific activities
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yjNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
CENSORSHIP:INFORMATION::
BeforeGibson,populardiscoursesurroundingtheInformationAgeoftendepictedthecurrenteraasoneinwhichadvancedtec
Althoughsomescientists______thecredibilityoftheworkoftheirassistants,theyalso______theirexperimentaldata.
Perfectcertaintybelongsonlytothegods;therestofushavetomakedowithscienceandits______.
A、citethecaseofa"primitive"or"barbaric"nationbeingdistinguishedfroma"civilized"nationB、provideanexampleofast
A、Itsummarizesthebenefitsthatmayaccruefromaperfectedsystemofpathologicaltaxonomy.B、Itprovidesadditionalreasons
CORRECTIVE:AMEND::
Traditionallyeconomicswasdubbedthe"dismalscience"inresponsetothenotionthatscarcityisitsfoundation,andit
Darwinproposedthetheoryofsexualselectiontoexplaintheoriginofostentatiousplumageincertainbirdspecies,mai
Informationonbehavioraldeficitsinratsisalso______tohumans,butthereisanenormousstepbetweenthepsychologyofthet
随机试题
在考生文件夹下,“samp1.accdb”数据库文件中已建立两个表对象(名为“员工表”和“部门表”)和一个窗体对象(名为“fEmp”)。试按以下要求顺序,完成表及窗体的各种操作。将窗体对象“fEmp”的记录源设置为表对象“员工表"。
应用象征性的标记来宣传组织形象执行的原则是()。
患者,女性,38岁,患"急性尿道炎"。症见小便短赤而频数,溺时涩痛,淋漓不畅,口燥咽干,小腹急满,舌红苔黄腻。脉滑数者。治宜选用
质量不符合约定的,如果根据约定或《合同法》有关规定均不能确定如何承担违约责任的,受损害方根据标的物性质及损失大小,可以合理选择()。
余额试算平衡是根据会计恒等式的平衡关系检验账户记录的正确性。()
邮政综合计算机网是覆盖()的大型企业网。
《旅行社条例实施细则》属于旅游行业的()。
2018年2月9日,第二十三届冬季奥林匹克运动会在韩国()开幕。
道德行为是指在一定的道德意识支配下表现出来的具有道德意义并能对此进行道德评价的行为,与“非道德行为”相对,包括道德的行为和不道德的行为两大类。不同时代、民族、社会和阶级对这两类行为有不同的标准。一般来说,道德的行为是有利于他人和社会的行为,反之则为不道德行
一、注意事项1.本题本由给定资料与作答要求两部分构成。考试时限为150分钟。其中,阅读给定资料参考时限为40分钟,作答参考时限为110分钟。2.请在题本、答题卡指定位置上用黑色字迹的钢笔或签字笔填写自己的姓名和准考证号,并用2B铅笔在准
最新回复
(
0
)