首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-01-13
108
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations ______
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
由第四段最后一句可知,经理们(executives)相信大家意见一致(consensus)而非意见不和(conflict)会提高财经指数(financial indicators)。这与D选项“对于以盈利为目的机构来说,成功在于意见的大致统一(general agreement)”基本一致。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zNmi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Learningdisabilitiesareverycommon.Theyaffectperhaps10percentofallchildren.Fourtimesasmanyboysasgirlshavelea
Comparedwiththeircosmologist(宇宙学家)colleagues,cosmogonists(星源学家)cansoundalittleold-fashioned.EdgarAllenPoeturnedto
______allofuswhoareheretonight,IwouldliketothankMr.Johnsonforhisinformativetalk.
Heisan______boy,alwaysinsistingonhisownrightsandopinions.
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsonthefollowingtopic.Ple
Shealwayshandlestheproblems______herownexperienceandprinciples.
Ihaveaninfatuation(迷恋)withautumn.Thecolorsoftheseason,andthesmells,havealwaysthrilledme.Ihavealwaysfoundjoy
Ihaveaninfatuation(迷恋)withautumn.Thecolorsoftheseason,andthesmells,havealwaysthrilledme.Ihavealwaysfoundjoy
Ihaveaninfatuation(迷恋)withautumn.Thecolorsoftheseason,andthesmells,havealwaysthrilledme.Ihavealwaysfoundjoy
ProfessorJohnson’sretirement______fromnextJunuary.
随机试题
关于不同文化对色彩的偏好和禁忌,下列说法不正确的是()
下列哪项不符合慢性病贫血的实验室检查结果?
行政机关单方面解除行政合同的情形不包括下列哪种情况?()
自行车道与人行道的面层常用()。
存货、固定资产等实物资产应当定期盘点,盘点结果如果与账面记录不符,应于期末前查明原因,并根据企业的管理权限,经股东大会或董事会,经理(厂长)会议或类似机构批准后,在期末结账前处理完毕。()
预收账款不多的企业,可以不设置“预收账款”科目。企业预收客户货款时,直接将其记入“应付账款”科目的贷方。()
公安机关是政府的一个职能部门,但又不同于一般行政机关;人民警察是国家公务人员,但又不同于政府其他部门的公务员。因此,对人民警察的素质和职业道德必须有更高和更严的要求。()
今年是五四运动的88周年,五四精神的内涵是()
人骑自行车,两脚使劲踩1小时只能跑10公里左右;人开汽车,一脚轻踩油门1小时,能跑100公里;人坐高铁,闭上眼睛1小时也能跑300公里;人乘飞机,吃着美味1小时能跑1000公里。这段文字给我们的启示是()。
假设一经济体系的消费函数为C=600+0.8Y,投资函数为I=400-50r,政府购买为G=200,货币需求函数为L=250+0.5Y-125r,货币供给M(s)=1250(单位均是亿美元)。价格水平是P=1.试求:均衡收入和利率.
最新回复
(
0
)