首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Main
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Main
admin
2013-12-06
66
问题
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Singapore Government.
That does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure as un-Asian. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. The law cannot legislate filial responsibility any more than it can legislate love. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Singapore needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to shore it up.
Like many other developed nations, Singapore faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is inexorable. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By the end of the century that figure will grow to 11%. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age per se. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family, lifts is not a revolutionary concept. Nor is it uniquely Asian. Care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Singapore is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Asian nations from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Singapore is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea. It reinforces the traditional values and it doesn’t hurt a society now and then to remind itself of its core values.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice. Until now, if a person asked family elders, clergymen or the Ministry of Community Development to help get financial support from his children, the most they could do was to mediate. But mediators have no teeth, and a child could simply ignore their pleas.
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace. Few people would be so thick-skinned as to say, "Sue will be damned." The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened. It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the recalcitrant son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.
It would be nice to think Singapore doesn’t need this kind of law. But that belief ignores the clear demographic trends and the effect of affluence itself on traditional bends. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
选项
A、Filial responsibility in Singapore is enforced by law.
B、Fathers have legal obligations to look after their children.
C、It is an acceptable practice for the old to continue working.
D、The Advisory Council was dissatisfied with the problems of the old.
答案
B
解析
短文第七段第二句说“A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children.”这与B的说法一致,故B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zfU3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
Cultureshockmightbecalledanoccupationaldiseaseofpeoplewhohavebeensuddenlytransplantedabroad.Likemostailments,
Ihadneverbeeninthepublicwardofahospitalbefore,anditwasmyfirstexperienceofdoctorswhohandleyouwithoutspeak
Peoplehaveworriedaboutsmogformanyyears,andthegovernmenthasspentbillionsofdollarstotrytocleanuptheairofbi
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Mostexpertssaythatthenewtaxplanwillhaveanegligibleeffectonthecountry’seconomicproblems.
Seanalivedintheinpatienthospiceunitformorethanamonth,farlongerthananyonewouldhavepredicted,sustainedonlyon
AnabandonedairfieldnearaformerNaziconcentrationtrampmaysoonfeaturepagodasandTaiChiparks.A$700millionproject
Butitwasnotuntilthe1890’sthatarchaeologistsexcavatingincity-stateswelltothesouthofNinevehfoundmanythousands
A、Adelicateart.B、Areligion.C、Anexactscience.D、Awayoflife.B从“Firstofall,itisnotareligion.”可知B项正确。
随机试题
简述资本主义国家的职能。
如果抵押人的行为足以使抵押物价值降低的,抵押权人(银行)有权要求抵押人停止其行为,并要求抵押人恢复抵押物的价值,或者提供与减少的价值相当的担保,即追加担保品,以达到原抵押合同规定的价值。()
位于A市的甲企业是增值税一般纳税人,2017年4月将其位于B市的一座办公楼(2014年取得)出租,取得含税租金收入100000元,选择简易计税办法,则其应在B市预缴增值税()元。
《海牙规则》是要求承运人在开航前和开航时谨慎处理使船舶适航,而不是在整个航程中都要保证船舶适航。()
2003年10月17日晨6时许,载着航天英雄杨利伟的“神舟”五号飞船在内蒙古大草原成功着陆,我国首次载人航天飞行取得圆满成功。这表明我国载人航天技术有了重大的突破,对增强我国国防力量和提高国际地位都具有重要意义。有的推进器中盛有液态肼(N2H4)和液
下列关于基础教育课程改革目标的表述,正确的有()。(2015.河南)
你同事工作能力差。却成为你的主管领导。怎么处理关系?
孔子非常懂得饮食和养生的道理,《论语·乡党》就列出了很多“食”和“不食”的主张,比如“不时不食”,意思是说不要吃反季节蔬菜。以下哪项陈述是上述解释所必须依赖的假设?()
现在时间为4点分,此时时针与分针成什么角度?
准确地说,教育学的研究对象是()。
最新回复
(
0
)