首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the
admin
2014-06-25
62
问题
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the most attention and guide further research. But many studies produce non-confirmatory data—observations that refute current ideas and carefully constructed hypotheses. And it can be argued that these "negative data," far from having little value in science, are actually an integral part of scientific progress that deserve more attention.
At first glance, this may seem a little nonsensical; after all, how can non-confirmatory results help science to progress when they fail to substantiate anything? But in fact, in a philosophical sense, only negative data resulting in rejection of a hypothesis represent real progress. As philosopher of science Karl Popper stated; "Every refutation should be regarded as a great success; not merely a success of the scientist who refuted the theory, but also of the scientist who created the refuted theory and who thus in the first instance suggested, if only indirectly, the refuting experiment. "
On a more practical level, Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine(JNRBM)was launched on the premise that scientific progress depends not only on the accomplishments of individuals but requires teamwork and open communication of all results -positive and negative. After all, the scientific community can only learn from negative results if the data are published.
Though not every negative result will turn out to be of groundbreaking significance, it is imperative to be aware of the more balanced perspective that can result from the publication of non-confirmatory findings. The first and most obvious benefits of publishing negative results are a reduction in the duplication of effort between researchers, leading to the acceleration of scientific progress, and greater transparency and openness.
More broadly, publication of negative data might also contribute to a more realistic appreciation of the "messy" nature of science. Scientific endeavors rarely result in perfect discoveries of elements of "truth" about the world. This is largely because they are frequently based on methods with real limitations and hypotheses based on uncertain premises.
It is perhaps this "messy" aspect of science that contributes to a hesitation within the scientific community to publish negative data. In an ever more competitive environment, it may be that scientific journals prefer to publish studies with clear and specific conclusions. Indeed, Daniele Fanelli of the University of Edinburgh suggests that results may be distorted by a "publish or perish" culture in which the progress of scientific careers depends on the frequency and quality of citations. This leads to a situation in which data that support a hypothesis may be perceived in a more positive light and receive more citations than data that only generate more questions and uncertainty.
Despite the effects of this competitive environment, however, a willingness to publish negative data is emerging among researchers. Publications that emphasize positive findings are of course useful, but a more balanced presentation of all the data, including negative or failed experiments, would also make a significant contribution to scientific progress.
Which of the following statements is true according to the first paragraph?
选项
A、Negative data lies at the core of scientific progress.
B、Non-confirmatory data are not receiving corresponding attention.
C、The mission of hypothesis-driven research is to reject current ideas.
D、Confirmatory data are the major stimulus to further research.
答案
B
解析
该段首句指出现实情况:那些正向的、验证性数据最受关注。随后表明自己观点:那些负向数据同样有意义.理应得到(deserve more attention)更多重视,据此可推知人们没有赋予负向(非验证性)数据应有的重视,[B]选项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2GK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
How’sthisforacynicalviewofscience?(46)"Anewscientifictruthdoesnottriumphbyconvincingitsopponentsandmakingth
Jurydutyisbadenough,butimaginenotbeingabletocheckyourphoneore-mailtohelprelievetheboredom.That’sthenewru
(46)In1798ThomasRobertMalthusfamouslypredictedthatshort-termgainsinlivingstandardswouldinevitablybeunderminedas
IsittruethattheAmericanintellectualisrejectedandconsideredofnoaccountinhissociety?Iamgoingtosuggestthatit
NewYorkTimeswasnotcriticizedbytheconservativebecauseofbeing______.WhichoneisNOTtrue?
NewYorkTimeswasnotcriticizedbytheconservativebecauseofbeing______.Thefifthparagraphimplies______.
YouareastudentofPekingUniversity.Writeanapplicationtogetascholarshipforyourgraduatestudyinanotheruniversity
Expertshavelearnedfromstudyingotherdisasters,suchasOklahomaCitybombing,the【C1】______ofSept.11andthe【C2】______of
Everyonehassufferedfromheadaches,but【C1】______recentlymedicalresearcherswerenotcertainwhatcausedthem.Blewresearch
Everyonehassufferedfromheadaches,but【C1】______recentlymedicalresearcherswerenotcertainwhatcausedthem.Blewresearch
随机试题
“永州八记”写于柳宗元被贬为________时,其首篇是《________》。
以下观点何项是《诸病源候论》提出的
男性,30岁。患出血坏死性胰腺炎2周,经治疗,高热不退,持续腹痛。体检:上腹扪及一块物。血淀粉酶1000U/L(Somogyi法),血白细胞14×109/L,中性粒细胞0.85(85%)。最可能的原因是
病理切片中见到绒毛结构的疾病不是流产后不规则流血,子宫内容物组织学检查为成团的滋养细胞,未见绒毛结构,诊断为
目前,各银行还根据个人需求提供个性化的还款方式及还款服务,较为常见的特色还款方式包括()。
日用小杂品的配送在现实生活中,往往都是采用()方法来向用户供货和发送货物的。
Sociologists(社会学家)tellusthatweareheadingforasocietyleisure.Thetrendisunmistakable.Onehundredyearsago,theypo
A、 B、 C、 D、 C确认图片中有孩子们和一位女士在公交车旁排成一队,同时公交车里面的男士正在看着他们。
A、Newspaperoflowprice.B、Newspaperwithattractiveheadline.C、Newspaperwithsportspage.D、Newspaperwithbusinesssection.
A、Theinterpersonalrelationship.B、Thehighpressure.C、Theservantsystem.D、Therapidprogress.B原文提到美国人对时间又爱又十艮,后面具体解释原因,答案依
最新回复
(
0
)