首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
48
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The author assumes that the reader thinks "immortality" ______.
选项
A、frightening
B、unavoidable
C、profitable
D、desirable
答案
D
解析
从文中倒数第四段“Cloning is not fl pathway to immortality,then,becauseyour consciousness does not survive in your clone,any more than it would in your identicaltwin if you had one.”可知,克隆并不是不朽的途径。因为你的意识并未在克隆体中存活,如果你有一个双胞胎的话,他将不会存在于你的双胞胎身上。因此D项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Althoughsolutionstoaproblemareoftenthe.fruitofdirectinvestmentsintargetedresearch,themostrevolutionarysolution
71.ItwasnotuntilmodernscholarshipuncoveredthesecretofreadingMiddleEnglishthatwecouldunderstandthatChaucer,fa
TheUnitedStatesisacountrymadeupofmanydifferentraces.Usuallytheyaremixedtogetherandcan’tbetoldfromoneanoth
Itwasalongtimebeforethecutonmyhand______completely.
IhaveneverseenMrs.Clarkbefore,butIknowfromhermedicalchartandthereportIreceivedfromtheprecedingshiftthatt
Whatdoconsumersreallywant?That’saquestionmarketresearcherswouldlovetoanswer.Butsincepeopledon’talwayssaywhat
Itisoftenobservedthattheagedspendmuchtimethinkingandtalkingabouttheirpastlives,【71】aboutthefuture.Theseremin
Itisoftenobservedthattheagedspendmuchtimethinkingandtalkingabouttheirpastlives,【71】aboutthefuture.Theseremin
Canexercisebeabadthing?Suddendeathduringorsoonalterstrenuousexertiononthesquashcourtoronthearmytraininggr
Shewasunimpressedbytheactor,describinghimas"avainmanand______dull".
随机试题
正常新生儿出生24h护理不妥的是
下列哪种义务属于主给付义务:()
招标采购法律法规体系包括两个方面,一是招标采购专业法律规范,二是相关法律规范。下列选项属于招标采购专业法律规范的是()。
OutlookExpress是用来浏览网页的软件。()
下列说法正确的是()。
在金融期货交易和金融期权交易中,交易双方都必须开立保证金账户。()
下列有关前沿科技的应用及评价,表述不正确的是:
阅读以下文字,回答问题。玫瑰在植物分类上属于蔷薇科蔷薇属,已有上千年的栽培历史,在此期间,人们通过广泛杂交,培育出数量庞大的品种群。如今,世界各地(主要是北半球地区)生长着200多个种类的玫瑰。植物学家和园艺家一般将玫瑰分成两大类,即野生玫瑰和园
【西安事变】西北大学2013年中国史真题;浙江工商大学2016年专门史真题;苏州科技大学2017年中国通史真题
“对于我,失去的是我个人的一些剥削所得,它比起国家第一个五年计划的投资总额是多么渺小,……经过一个公私合营的过程,……只要自己努力,完全可以成为光荣的社会主义社会的自食其力的劳动者。”这段话所反映的历史事件是()。
最新回复
(
0
)