首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination i
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination i
admin
2013-07-30
27
问题
Choice blindness: You don’t know what you want
We have all heard of experts who fail basic tests of sensory discrimination in their own field: wine snobs(自命不凡的人)who can’t tell red from white wine(though in blackened cups), or art critics who see deep meaning in random lines drawn by a computer. We delight in such stories since anyone claiming to be an authority is fair game. But what if we shine the spotlight on choices we make about everyday things? Experts might be forgiven for being wrong about the limits of their skills as experts, but could we be forgiven for being wrong about the limits of our skills as experts on ourselves?
We have been trying to answer this question using techniques from magic performances. Rather than playing tricks with alternatives presented to participants, we secretly altered the outcomes of their choices, and recorded how they react. For example, in an early study we showed our volunteers pairs of pictures of faces and asked them to choose the most attractive. In some trials, immediately after they made their choice, we asked people to explain the reasons behind their choices.
Unknown to them, we sometimes used a double-card magic trick to secretly exchange one face for the other so they ended up with the face they did not choose. Common sense dictates that all of us would notice such a big change in the outcome of a choice. But the result showed that in75 per cent of the trials our participants were blind to the mismatch, even offering "reasons" for their "choice".
We called this effect "choice blindness", echoing change blindness, the phenomenon identified by psychologists where a remarkably large number of people fail to spot a major change in their environment. Recall the famous experiments where X asks Y for directions; while Y is struggling to help, X is switched for Z — and Y fails to notice. Researchers are still pondering the full implications, but it does show how little information we use in daily life, and undermines the idea that we know what is going on around us.
When we set out, we aimed to weigh in on the enduring, complicated debate about self-knowledge and intentionality. For all the intimate familiarity we feel we have with decisionmaking, it is very difficult to know about it from the "inside": one of the great barriers for scientific research is the nature of subjectivity.
As anyone who has ever been in a verbal disagreement can prove, people tend to give elaborate justifications for their decisions, which we have every reason to believe are nothing more than rationalisations(文过饰非)after the event. To prove such people wrong, though, or even provide enough evidence to change their mind, is an entirely different matter: who are you to say what my reasons are?
But with choice blindness we drive a large wedge between intentions and actions in the mind. As our participants give us verbal explanations about choices they never made, we can show them beyond doubt — and prove it — that what they say cannot be true. So our experiments offer a unique window into confabulation(虚构)(the story-telling we do to justify things after the fact)that is otherwise very difficult to come by. We can compare everyday explanations with those under lab conditions, looking for such things as the amount of detail in descriptions, how coherent the narrative is, the emotional tone, or even the timing or flow of the speech. Then we can create a theoretical framework to analyse any kind of exchange.
This framework could provide a clinical use for choice blindness: for example, two of our ongoing studies examine how malingering(装病)might develop into true symptoms, and how confabulation might play a role in obsessive-compulsive disorder(强迫症).
Importantly, the effects of choice blindness go beyond snap judgments. Depending on what our volunteers say in response to the mismatched outcomes of choices(whether they give short or long explanations, give numerical rating or labelling, and so on)we found this interaction could change their future preferences to the extent that they come to prefer the previously rejected alternative. This gives us a rare glimpse into the complicated dynamics of self-feedback("I chose this, I publicly said so, therefore I must like it"), which we suspect lies behind the formation of many everyday preferences.
We also want to explore the boundaries of choice blindness. Of course, it will be limited by choices we know to be of great importance in everyday life. Which bride or bridegroom would fail to notice if someone switched their partner at the altar through amazing sleight of hand(巧妙的手段)? Yet there is ample territory between the absurd idea of spouse-swapping, and the results of our early face experiments.
For example, in one recent study we invited supermarket customers to choose between two paired varieties of jam and tea. In order to switch each participant’s choice without them noticing, we created two sets of "magical" jars, with lids at both ends and a divider inside. The jars looked normal, but were designed to hold one variety of jam or tea at each end, and could easily be flipped over.
Immediately after the participants chose, we asked them to taste their choice again and tell us verbally why they made that choice. Before they did, we turned over the sample containers, so the tasters were given the opposite of what they had intended in their selection. Strikingly, people detected no more than a third of all these trick trials. Even when we switched such remarkably different flavors as spicy cinnamon and apple for bitter grapefruit jam, the participants spotted less than half of all switches.
We have also documented this kind of effect when we simulate online shopping for consumer products such as laptops or cellphones, and even apartments. Our latest tests are exploring moral and political decisions, a domain where reflection and deliberation are supposed to play a central role, but which we believe is perfectly suited to investigating using choice blindness.
Throughout our experiments, as well as registering whether our volunteers noticed that they had been presented with the alternative they did not choose, we also quizzed them about their beliefs about their decision processes. How did they think they would feel if they had been exposed to a study like ours? Did they think they would have noticed the switches? Consistently, between 80 and 90 per cent of people said that they believed they would have noticed something was wrong.
Imagine their surprise, even disbelief, when we told them about the nature of the experiments. In everyday decision-making we do see ourselves as knowing a lot about our selves, but like the wine buff or art critic, we often overstate what we know. The good news is that this form of decision snobbery should not be too difficult to treat. Indeed, after reading this article you might already be cured.
What do we learn about the boundaries of choice blindness?
选项
A、The boundaries are impossible to be marked.
B、It occurs only when decisions are not important.
C、It could happen even in the significant events.
D、Brides won’t have choice blindness in the weddings.
答案
C
解析
该段都是围绕the boundaries of choice blindness展开,首先提到它应当不会发生在那些我们知道对我们的日常生活有重要意义的选择上,然后通过问句举例说明:在婚礼的圣坛上,有哪个新娘或者新郎会注意不到,自己的另一半被人用惊人的巧妙手段调包了?最后用yet转折提到,我们早期的脸孔实验结果与这种荒唐的婚礼调包计之间,依然存在着广阔的空间,言外之意就是在一些诸如婚礼等重要事件中,the boundaries of choice blindness 也可能发生,故答案为[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HT97777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】______shouldbemade
Thepassageismainlyaboutwhyandhowtoplantmoretreestomakeuniversitiesbecomegreen.Sustainabilityhasabroadermea
Manymanufacturers_________________________(过于专注降低成本而受到了指责),oftenattheexpenseofthequalityoftheirproducts.
SuggestionsforYourWorkAnnieisalongtimesecretary/receptionistfortwoseniorvicepresidentsatabigcompany.Theyh
Ithasbeentoolate,__________(当人们认识到这些食品不安全时).
PublicizingListsofUncivilizedResidents1,目前某市政府在媒体上曝光不文明的市民2.人们对这种做法反应不一3.你的看法
A、2000000.B、3500.C、110000.D、361.C事实细节题。男士明确表示这次调查涉及361所学校总共110000名学生,故答案为C)。
A、Lendthemansomemoney.B、Calculatethebillagain.C、Refusetopaythebill.D、Invitethemantodinner.B男士认为女士算的账有问题,他只吃了色
Theytriedtoavoid______(让女儿做她不喜欢的事情).
ChoosingUniversitiesorSpecialties1.进入大学前,很多学生面临是选择学校还是选择专业的问题2.对此问题不同的人有不同的看法3.你对此的看法
随机试题
X线束成为混合射线的原因是
张某意图盗窃深夜潜入李某家中,见熟睡的李某心生歹意,对李某实施了强奸,在李某反抗的过程中张某将李某压迫致死。此案经县公安局侦查终结后。移送县人民检察院审查起诉。县检察院审查后认为。张某作案手段残忍,情节特别严重,可能被判处无期徒刑甚至死刑。为此,正确的做法
当需要进行土壤环境影响评价时,除要比较详细地叙述主要土壤类型及其分布,土壤的肥力与使用情况等内容外,还应根据需要选择土壤的物理、化学性质,土壤一次、二次污染状况,水土流失的原因、特点、面积、元素及流失量等,同时要附( )。
下列关于固定资产折旧的说法正确的有()。
会计人员被动地受单位领导指使弄虚作假,没有造成严重后果,且本人认罪态度较好,有悔改行为的,由县级以上人民政府财政部门吊销会计从业资格证书,自被吊销会计从业资格证书之日起()年内不得重新取得会计从业资格证书。
在明确了企业收益预测前提条件的基础上,对企业未来3~5年的预期收益预测的主要内容包括()。
顾客将胶卷交照相馆冲印,照相馆交给顾客一份取印单,该取印单属于( )。
Theclean-energybusinessisturningintothenextbiginvestmentboom,inwhichrisksarelightlyignored.Untilrecently,reca
下面不属于软件设计原则的是()。
Mostpeopledon’twakeupinthemorning,combtheirhair,andwalkoutthefrontdoorandontotheworldstage.ButBritain’sP
最新回复
(
0
)