首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
admin
2012-11-22
57
问题
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine
Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can open a floodgate of beliefs, concerns and, misinformation. Opinions are varied, mixed with fact and fiction, but one thing is clear: Open dialogue among researchers, teachers and the general public must continue as we struggle to define the relationship between our societal values and lifesciences research.
When the University of Washington .and the National Human Genome Research Institute hosted a community genetics forum last spring, questions abounded from the standing-room-only crowd about the implications of genetic research.
When is information about genetic health risks most helpful? Should genetic testing results be part of medical records and how would the results be used potentially by insurance companies? How can genetic testing benefit the criminal-justice system, such as establishings guilt or innocence using DNA testing,
The Human Genome Project will lead to amazing advances in medical science that will result in earlier diagnosis, more-targeted treatment, and a dramatic improvement in our ability to prevent terrible diseases. Genomic medicine will mean more personalized medicine tailored to the individual.
But these advances also carry inherent risks.
The obvious benefits of "personalized medicine" —use of genetic tests to guide preventive care and better drug prescribing—are counterbalanced by the possibility that such tests could lead to discrimination by insurers or employers. And, since genetic risk is often only one of the contributing factors to disease, overemphasis on personalized medicine could burden our health-care system with genetic tests of little or no benefit.
For example, smoking, diet and exercise play major roles in the risk of diabetes and heart disease. Identification of a genetic risk for these diseases can provide specific information for more-effective preventive care, but should not detract from pursuit of a healthy lifestyle.
The greatest health benefits of genomic research likely will come from insights into the basic biology of health and disease. This will ultimately lead to improved prevention and treatment—often without any need for genetic testing—for many diseases. The outcome from this research can be "precision medcine" —a morecost-effective approach to providing high-quality care. Thus, genomic medicine has the potential to improve the value of health care.
An example of the potential of genomic medicine to improve quality and reduce cost is the work of UW researchers Mark Rieder, Allan Rettie and Debbie Nickerson. They recently reported the discovery of a genetic method for accurately determining the proper dosage of a common blood-thinning drug, warfarin, which often produces adverse side effects because of its highly variable activity in patients.
Millions of people worldwide take worldwide to prevent stroke and blood clots, yet require expensive, constant testing from their physician to ensure proper dosage. These scientists’ findings illustrate how the powerful DNA analysis tools of the Human Genome Project are leading to a new era of tailoring drugs and therapies to an individual’s genome. Genomic medicine can lead to more-precise, personalized and cost- effective health care.
Medical advances always involve risk of harm, and genomic medicine is no exception. While technical issues require scientific research, we believe the challenges posed by genetic testing are far too critical to be left to the deliberation of scientists alone.
All members of society should have the opportunity to engage in collaborative discussion about the benefits and harms of genetic testing. Informed public discussion is vital to continue advances that hold so much promise for improving the value of health care.
Both educational resources and major organizational efforts will be needed to create opportunities for open discussion. But the most important resources are people’s time and their willingness to invest it in these discussions.
Researchers, teachers and the media have an obligation to create opportunities for sharing accurate, well-balanced information about potential uses of genomic technology.
The greatest health benefits of genomic research will come from insights into the basic biology of health and disease.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
B
解析
从第八段第一句可知
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/P2w7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Shewentthroughthetypescriptcarefully,to______allerrorsfromit.
Ifyourargumentlackslogical______,itwillbeimpossibleforyoutomakeothersbelievewhatyousay.
ThemainroadthroughLittleburywasblockedforthreehourstodayafteranaccident______twolorries.
ImusthavebrowsedthroughhundredsofguidesbutI’veno______wheretogoforthisyear’sholiday.
Anyworkundertakenonanindividualbasisshouldalways______attentiononthebroadersocialcontextinwhichtheindividuall
Itishardtopredicthowscienceisgoingtoturnout,andifitisreallygoodscienceitisimpossibletopredict.Ifthethi
Wegenerallyviewthefamilyasbeingoneofourmoststableinstitutions;yet,ourfamilysystemhas【B1】______anumberofchang
______(正是由于她太没有经验)hatshedoesnotknowhowtodealwiththesituation.
OnUpdatingKnowledge1.在现代社会,更新知识很重要2.更新知识的途径多种多样3.我的观点
随机试题
危机处理包括两个方面的含义,它们是()
【B1】【B14】
A.小便点滴不通,面色萎黄,食少纳呆B.小便点滴而下,烦躁口苦,舌质紫暗C.小便不通,排尿无力,腰酸无力D.小便点滴不通,短赤灼热,口苦口黏E.小便不通,胸胁胀痛,食少便溏癃闭患者属于肾阳衰惫的临床表现是()。
甲承包养鱼池养鱼。酒业公司的排水渠泄漏,废水流入养鱼池,导致鱼苗死亡。甲向县环保局申请行政处理。县环保局责令酒业公司限期改正,并处以罚款。同时,经县环保局调解,甲与酒业公司就赔偿数额达成协议。酒业公司未履行赔偿协议,甲要求县环保局强制执行该协议,县环保局拒
在商事仲裁中,下列关于仲裁中的管辖法院,说法正确的是:()
甲、乙共同出资设立一有限责任公司。乙与丙订立合同,约定由丙实际出资并享有投资权益,乙为名义股东。下列表述中,符合公司法律制度规定的有()。
秘书工作,是指协助领导决策与管理所进行的各项辅助性工作。()
回归教育是一种认为人的一生应是学习和工作不断交替、相互结合的过程,接受义务教育或基础教育乃至高等教育后就业的成年人,应在需要时又返回学校去学习的理论。根据以上定义,下列属于回归教育的是()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
“卡特尔16种人格因素调查表”中涉及的16种人格特质是16种
最新回复
(
0
)