首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice
admin
2010-07-19
46
问题
Sometime soon, according to animal-right activities, a great ape will testify in an American courtroom. Speaking through a voice synthesizer, or perhaps in sign language, the lucky ape will argue that it has a fundamental right to liberty. "This is going to be a very important case." Duke University law Prof. William Reppy Jr. told the New York Times.
Reppy concedes that apes can talk only at the level of a human 4-year-old, so they may not be ready to discuss abstractions like oppression and freedom. Just last month, one ape did manage to say through a synthesizer: "Please buy me a hamburger." That may not sound like crucial testimony, but lawyers think that the spectacle of an ape saying anything at all in court may change a lot of minds about the status of animals as property.
One problem is that apes probably won’t be able to convince judges that they know right from wrong, or that they intend to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Since they are not persons, they don’t even have legal standing to sue. No problem, says Steven Wise, who taught animal law for 10 years at Vermont law school and is now teaching Harvard law school’s first course in the subject. He says lawyers should be able to use slavery-era statutes that authorized legal nonpersons (slaves) to bring lawsuits. Gary Francione, who teaches animal law at Rutgers University, says that gorillas "should be declared to be persons under the constitution."
Unlike mainstream animal-welfare activists, radical animal-rights activists think that all animals are morally equal and have rights, though not necessarily the same rights as humans. So the law’s denial of rights to animals is simply a matter of bias-speciesism. It’s even an expression of bias to talk about protecting wildlife, since this assumes that human control and domination of other species is acceptable. These are surely far-out ideas. "Would even bacteria have rights?" asks one exasperated law professor, Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School.
For the moment, the radicals want to confine the rights discussion to apes and chimps, mostly to avoid the obvious mockery about litigious lemmings, cockroach liberation, and the issue of whether a hyena eating an antelope is committing a rights violation that should be brought before the world court in the Hague. One wag wrote a poem containing the line, "Every beast within his paws/Will clutch an order to show cause."
The news is that law schools are increasingly involved in animal issues. Any radical notion that vastly inflates the concept of rights and requires a lot more litigation is apt to take root in the law schools. ("Some lawyers say they are in the field to advance their ideology, but some note that it is an area of legal practice that could be profitable," reports the New York Times.)
A dozen law schools now feature courses on animal law, and in some cases at least, the teaching seems to be a simple extension of radical activism. The course description of next spring’s "Animal Law Seminar" at Georgetown University Law Center, for instance, makes clear to students which opinions are the correct ones to have, It talks about the plight of "rightless plaintiffs" and promises to examine how and why laws "purporting to protect" animals have failed.
Ideas about humane treatment of animals are indeed changing. Many of us have changed our minds about furs, zoos, slaughterhouse techniques, and at least some forms of animal experimentation. The debate about greater concern for the animal world continues. But the alliance between the radicals and the lawyers means that, once again, an issue that ought to be taken to the people and resolved by democratic means will most likely be pre-empted by judges and lawyers. Steven Wise talks of using the courts to knock down the wall between humans and apes. Once apes have rights, he says, the status of other animals can be decided by other courts and other litigation.
The advantage of the litigation strategy is that there’s no need to sell radical ideas to the American people. There are almost no takers for the concept of "nonhuman personhood," the view of pets as slaves, or the notion that meat eating is part of "a specter of oppression" that equally afflicts minorities, women, and animals in America. You can supersede open debate by convincing a few judges to detect a "rights" issue that functions as a political trump card. The rhetoric is high-minded, but the strategy is to force change without gaining the consent of the public.
Converting every controversy into a "rights" issue is by now a knee-jerk response. Harvard Law Prof. Mary Ann Glendon, author of Rights Talk, writes about our legal culture’s "lost language of obligation." Instead of casting arguments in terms of human responsibility for the natural world, rights talkers automatically spin out tortured arguments about "rights" of animals and even about the "rights" of trees and mountains. This is how "rights talk" becomes a parody of itself. Let’s hope the lawyers and the law schools eventually get the joke. (853 words)
Which of the following is true?
选项
A、Last month, one 4 years old ape managed to say something through a synthesizer.
B、Bacteria should have rights is a ludicrous statement.
C、All gorillas are suing for their constitutional rights.
D、No one cares about animal rights, in fact.
答案
B
解析
“细菌也有权利”显然是荒谬的,作者在文中也提到了这一点。A选项中“4 years old”没有提及。C、 D错误较为明显。事实上,还是有人在关心动物权利的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PklO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheauthorthinksthatDanesadopta______attitudetowardstheircountry.Accordingtothepassage,Danishorderliness
ForaCEOtobesuccessfulingovernment,hehastoAccordingtothepassage,thedifferencesbetweengovernmentandbusinessl
AccordingtotheUNHumanDevelopmentReport,whichisthebestplaceforwomenintheworld?
WhohavetakenpartindiscussionswiththegovernorofBrazilCentralBank?
TheChineseMinistryofEducationhasissuedadecreeprohibitingcollegestudentsfromlodgingoutsideschool.However,aloto
当前,世界多极化和经济全球化深入发展,科学技术突飞猛进,给亚洲的发展带来新的机遇,也带来新的挑战。亚洲有49个国家和地区,大部分是发展中经济体。经济全球化,有利于它们更多地获得资金,尤其是跨国企业的投资,加快经济发展和结构调整;有利于它们更好地利用自身优势
WhenSecretaryofStateCondoleezzaRicestoodbesideAfghanPresidentHamidKarzai,shemadeanenlightenedstatementaboutcut
Nowadays,thereisanewtrendamongcollegestudents.Manyofthemhavemovedouttoliveoutsidethecampus,someforlove,an
A、AgreaterpartofBurma.B、Xiannin,BeijingandShanghai.C、SouthKoreaandmanyothercountriesofEurope.D、MiddleEastand
Justafewweeksago,economistsandmarketanalystswereexpectingtheFederalReservetocutshortterminterestratesonefin
随机试题
下列能使TBG升高的是
凉膈散的功用是
对应于常用工具栏里“复制”按钮的快捷键是( )。
内孔磨削可以在()上进行。
以下行为中,应缴纳契税的有()。
[2015]下列有关审计风险的说法中,错误的是()。
内部业务流程指标主要不包括()
甲乙丙三人,他们的职业有律师、医生和教师,已知:(1)丙的收入比教师高;(2)甲的收入和医生不同;(3)医生的收入比乙少;根据以上条件,下列对甲乙丙三人身份判断正确的是:
双手调节器通常用来研究
Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】______shouldbemade
最新回复
(
0
)