首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
admin
2018-04-04
66
问题
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a glass of red wine a day will help us live longer. The next day, maybe not. It seems journalists are pretty interested in wine research and the same might be said for coffee. Now, there’s been a lot of research into whether coffee is good for our health. "The results have really been mixed," admits Neal Freedman who led the coffee study and published his findings in a medical journal recently. "There’s been some evidence that coffee might increase the risk of certain diseases and there’s also been maybe more recent evidence that coffee may protect against other diseases as well."
Freedman and his colleagues undertook the biggest study yet to look at the relationship between coffee and health. They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study. "We found that the coffee drinkers had a modestly lower risk of death than those no-drinkers," he said. Here’s what he means by "modestly" : those who drank at least two or three cups a day were about 10 percent or 15 percent less likely to die for any reason during the 13 years of the study. When the researchers looked at specific causes of death, coffee drinking appeared to cut the risk of dying from heart disease, lung disease, injuries, accidents and infections.
Now, Freedman stressed that the study doesn’t prove coffee can make people live longer. A study like this can never prove a cause-and-effect relationship. All it can really do is to point researchers in the right direction for further investigation. And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you, scientists have no idea why.
According to the author, scientists______.
选项
A、have already proved that coffee is good for human health
B、have a long way to go before they find a way to study coffee
C、have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee
D、are still unable to figure out why coffee is good for us
答案
D
解析
根据第三段最后一句“And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you,scientists have no idea why.”可知,科学家们对咖啡有益于人体的原因还没有弄明白,所以选项D正确。选项C干扰性较强,从最后一段第二句可知,科学家们并不是一开始就have avoided the cause-and-effect approach to study coffee,排除C。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UiCO777K
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Teacherscanhardlybe______carefulwhentheyinstructalesson.
ChinesefigureskatingpairZhangDanandZhangHaogotasilvermedalinfreeskatingintheWinterOlympicGames______inTur
Mr.Hallunderstandsthat______mathhasalwaysbeeneasyforhim,itisnoteasyforthestudents.
OnAIDSDay,theministerofHealthDepartmentdemandedthattheproblems______paidspecialattentionto.
Theydiscussedtheproblemthreeorfourtimes,butcouldcometono_________.
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.(78)Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,theb
What______iftheweatherhadbeenfineyesterday?
Youwillbegettingmarriedandhavingafamily______andthenyou’llunderstandwhyparentswanttoprotecttheirchildren.
Itwasacoldwinterday.AwomandroveuptotheRainbowBridgetollbooth(收费站)."I’mpayingformyself,andforthesixcarsb
Normallyastudentmustattendanumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgiveshimagradewhic
随机试题
下列民事行为中有效的是:()
以下关于矩阵型组织结构的说法不正确的是()
原植物属于菊科的药材
A.由工商行政管理部门或相关部门没收药材和全部违法所得,并处以罚款B.当地有关部门有权制止;造成损失的,承担赔偿责任C.由所在单位或上级管理部门给予行政处分;造成野生药材资源损失的,承担赔偿责任D.由当地有关管理部门没收非法采猎的野生药材和工具,并处
稽察人员与被稽察项目之间的关系是()。
单位负责人不得指使会计机构、会计人员()。
丙公司为上市公司,2008年1月1日,丙公司以银行存款6000万元购入一项无形资产。2009年和2010年年末,丙公司预计该项无形资产的可收回金额分别为4000万元和3556万元。该项无形资产的预计使用年限为10年,按月摊销。丙公司于每年末对无形资产计提减
△ABC中,名cotAcotB>1,则△ABC一定是()。
如果被搜查人或者其家属不在场,公安机关则不能进行搜查。()
GPSA)TheGlobalPositioningSystemisa.space-basedtriangulationsystemusingsatellitesandcomputerstomeasurepositi
最新回复
(
0
)