首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Are human genes patentable? It would seem a simple question. But it has been the subject of years of litigation, academic head-s
Are human genes patentable? It would seem a simple question. But it has been the subject of years of litigation, academic head-s
admin
2013-09-16
35
问题
Are human genes patentable? It would seem a simple question. But it has been the subject of years of litigation, academic head-scratching and thunderous debates between some executives who say such patents propel innovation and others who say they curb it. All this culminated today with a decision from the United States Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision, its answer is "no".
At issue are the patents held by Myriad Genetics, a company based in Utah, on two genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes are linked to an inherited form of breast cancer. Myriad found the precise location of the genes on two chromosomes and sequenced them. The company’s patents have given Myriad the exclusive right to extract and isolate the two genes, administer tests for the mutations and create synthetic BRCA DNA.
Critics, led by the American Civil Liberties Union(ACLU), have argued that the patents are unconstitutional. America’s courts have long held that "laws of nature, natural phenomena and abstract ideas are not patentable", but are the "basic tools of scientific and technological work". Myriad and its allies countered that, in an era propelled by genomics, patents are necessary to drive future discovery.
The Supreme Court waded into this difficult debate in April, when it heard oral arguments from both sides. The justices searched for analogies to make the biological debate simpler, settling on two: a baseball bat and medicinal sap from an Amazonian leaf. The court ruled that Myriad’s patents are invalid. The ruling reads a bit like an elementary science lesson, explaining the structure of DNA. Its conclusion is similarly straightforward. The justices conceded that Myriad had "found an important and useful gene, but groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery does not by itself satisfy" the patent law’s requirements for "new and useful. .. composition of matter". In sum, a "naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and is not eligible for patenting merely because it has been isolated".
The court limited its ruling. It held that synthetic DNA may be patented, as urged by the federal government in an amicus brief. Furthermore, it explained; "Had Myriad created an innovative method of manipulating genes while searching for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, it could possibly have sought a method patent. " The court also said that the ruling does not limit patents on new applications of knowledge about BRCA1 and BRCA2, nor does it stop the "patentability of DNA in which the order of the naturally occurring nucleotides has been altered. "
Myriad has yet to issue a statement. Lawyers at the ACLU were excited. "Today, the court struck down a major barrier to patient care and medical innovation," said the ACLUs Sandra Park. "Because of this ruling, patients will have greater access to genetic testing and scientists can engage in research on these genes without fear of being sued. "
The court concludes that Myriad’s work______.
选项
A、isn’t of much practical value
B、doesn’t involve creation of new elements
C、is too obvious to get legal protection
D、doesn’t reveal the structure of DNA
答案
B
解析
第四段指出法庭对Myriad工作(将BRcAl和BRCA2分离)的论断:Myriad公司的发现非常重要,但即便是伟大的发现,若不含有“新的,有用的成分”也不能被授予专利。DNA片段是自然的产物,不应该只是因为把它分离出来就获得专利。[B]选项正确,是法庭判断两项专利无效的主要原因。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o6O4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Baghdad,Iraq—If,intime,theattempttoimplantapro-Western,democraticpoliticalsysteminIraqendsupburiedinthedeser
Illiteracymaybeconsideredmoreasanabstractconceptthanacondition.WhenafamousEnglishwriterusedthe(1)_____overt
Illiteracymaybeconsideredmoreasanabstractconceptthanacondition.WhenafamousEnglishwriterusedthe(1)_____overt
Illiteracymaybeconsideredmoreasanabstractconceptthanacondition.WhenafamousEnglishwriterusedthe(1)_____overt
Illiteracymaybeconsideredmoreasanabstractconceptthanacondition.WhenafamousEnglishwriterusedthe(1)_____overt
AsfarasAmericanschoolsystemisconcerned,itisalmostimpossibletopickoutoneinstitutionastypicalorevenrepresenta
Theincreaseinglobaltrademeansthatinternationalcompaniescannotaffordtomakecostlyadvertisingmistakesiftheywantt
[A]MarkWilliamsandJasonMattingley,whosestudyhasjustbeenpublishedinCurrentBiology,lookedatthewayaperson’ssex
Environmentalistsrejoice;ExxonMobilisonyourside.Well,sortof.Inhischaracteristicallyplain-speakingway,RexTillers
InAugust,environmentalistsinthePhilippinesvandalizedafieldofGoldenRice,anexperimentalgrainwhosegeneshadbeenmo
随机试题
铣削斜齿圆柱齿轮时,应按当量齿数选取铣刀齿数。
妻患病,保留女胎:夫妻均为携带者,出生儿有1/4发病:
患者,男,68岁。咳嗽、咳痰3周,咳黄白痰,痰中带血丝,经抗生素治疗后症状无缓解。查体:体温38.0℃,右上肺呼吸音稍弱,可闻及少许湿啰音。实验室检查:WBC12×109/L,N0.88。如果该患者右侧胸腔积液,最有可能的原因是
A.毛果芸香碱B.新斯的明C.碘解磷定D.阿托品E.异丙肾上腺素治疗手术后腹胀气和尿潴留可选用
患者,男,58岁。耳聋10余年,耳中如蝉鸣,伴五心烦热,遗精盗汗,舌红少津,脉细数。治疗宜在太溪、照海、听宫的基础上,加取
甲和乙是兄弟,二人一同抢劫了行人丙,劫取财物总价值达2000元。丙报案,但在公安机关尚未锁定犯罪嫌疑人之前甲到公安局投案,并向公安局交代了自己抢劫丙的具体情形,但声称自己并不认识抢劫的同案犯,两人只是都盯上了丙,便准备一起动手。后案件侦破,乙被抓获。则下列
根据《银行业从业人员职业操守》规定,符合“客户投诉”规定的有()。
根据增值税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,免征增值税的是()。
1983年10月被原国家旅游局确定为中国旅游标志的东汉青铜器是()。
社会保障,指依据一定的法律和规定,为保证社会成员的基本生活权利而提供的救助和补贴。根据以上定义,下面哪种情况属于社会保障?
最新回复
(
0
)