首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Passage Three (1) Don’t always believe what scientists and other authorities tell you! Be skeptical! Think critically! That’
Passage Three (1) Don’t always believe what scientists and other authorities tell you! Be skeptical! Think critically! That’
admin
2022-09-27
29
问题
Passage Three
(1) Don’t always believe what scientists and other authorities tell you! Be skeptical! Think critically! That’s what I tell my students, ad nauseam. And some learn the lesson too well.
(2)I want to give my students the benefit of my hard-won knowledge of science’s fallibility. Early in my career, I was a conventional science writer, easily impressed by scientists’ claims. Fields such as physics, neuroscience, genetics and artificial intelligence seemed to be bearing us toward a future in which bionic superhumans would zoom around the cosmos in warp-drive spaceships. Science was an " endless frontier," as physicist Vannevar Bush, a founder of the National Science Foundation, put it in 1945.
(3) Doubt gradually undermined my faith. Scientists and journalists, I realized, often presented the public with an overly optimistic picture of science. By relentlessly touting scientific "advances"—from theories of cosmic creation and the origin of life to the latest treatments for depression and cancer—and by overlooking all the areas in which scientists were spinning their wheels, we made science seem more potent and fast-moving than it really is.
(4) Now, I urge my students to doubt the claims of physicists that they are on the verge of explaining the origin and structure of the cosmos. Some of these optimists favor string and multiverse theories, which cannot be confirmed by any conceivable experiment. This isn’t physics any more, I declare in class, it’s science fiction with equations!
(5)I give the same treatment to theories of consciousness, which attempt to explain how a three-pound lump of tissue—the brain—generates perceptions, thoughts, memories, emotions and self-awareness. Some enthusiasts assert that scientists will soon reverse-engineer the brain so thoroughly that they will be able to build artificial brains much more powerful than our own. Balderdash! I tell my classes (or words to that effect). Scientists have proposed countless theories about how the brain absorbs, stores and processes information, but researchers really have no idea how the brain works. And artificial-intelligence advocates have been promising for decades that robots will soon be as smart as HAL or R2-D2. Why should we believe them now?
(6) Maybe, just maybe, I suggest, fields such as particle physics, cosmology and neuroscience are bumping up against insurmountable limits. The big discoveries that can be made have been made. Who says science has to solve every problem?
(7) Lest my students conclude that I’m some solitary crank, I assign them articles by other skeptics, including a dissection of epidemiology and clinical trials by journalist Gary Taubes in The New York Times. He advises readers to doubt dramatic claims about the benefits of some new drug or diet, especially if the claim is new. "Assume that the first report of an association is incorrect or meaningless," Taubes writes, because it probably is. "So be skeptical. "
(8) To drive this point home, I assign articles by John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist who has exposed the flimsiness of most peer-reviewed research. In a 2005 study, he concluded that "most published research findings are false. " He and his colleagues contend that "the more extreme, spectacular results (the largest treatment effects, the strongest associations, or the most unusually novel and exciting biological stories) may be preferentially published. " These sorts of dramatic claims are also more likely to be wrong.
(9) The cherry on this ice-cream sundae of doubt is a critique by psychologist Philip Tetlock of expertise in soft sciences, such as politics, history, and economics. In his 2005 book Expert Political Judgment, Tetlock presents the results of his 20-year study of the ability of 284 " experts" in politics and economics to make predictions about current affairs. The experts did worse than random guessing, or "dart-throwing monkeys," as Tetlock puts it. Like Ioannidis, Tetlock found a correlation between the prominence of experts and their fallibility. The more wrong the experts were, the more visible they were in the media. The reason, he conjectures, is that experts who make dramatic claims are more likely to get air time on CNN or column inches in The Washington Post, even though they are likelier to be wrong.
(10) For comic relief, I tell my students about a maze study, cited by Tetlock, that pitted rats against Yale undergraduates. Sixty percent of the time, researchers placed food on the left side of a fork in the maze; otherwise the food was placed randomly. After figuring out that the food was more often on the left side of the fork, the rats turned left every time and so were right 60 percent of the time. Yale students, discerning illusory patterns of left-right placement, guessed right only 52 percent of the time. Yes, the rats beat the Yalies! The smarter you are, the more likely you may be to "discover" patterns in the world that aren’t actually there.
(11) So how do my students respond to my skeptical teaching? Some react with healthy pushback, especially to my suggestion that the era of really big scientific discoveries might be over. " On a scale from toddler knowledge to ultimate enlightenment, man’s understanding of the universe could be anywhere," wrote a student named Matt. " How can a person say with certainty that everything is known or close to being known if it is incomparable to anything?"
(12) Other students embrace skepticism to a degree that dismays me. Cecelia, a biomedical-engineering major, wrote; "I am skeptical of the methods used to collect data on climate change, the analysis of this data, and the predictions made based on this data. " Pondering the lesson that correlation does not equal causation, Steve questioned the foundations of scientific reasoning. "How do we know there is a cause for anything?" he asked.
(13) In a similar vein, some students echoed the claim of radical postmodernists that we can never really know anything for certain, and hence that almost all our current theories will probably be overturned. Just as Aristotle’s physics gave way to Newton’s, which in turn yielded to Einstein’s, so our current theories of physics will surely be replaced by radically different ones.
(14) After one especially doubt-riddled crop of papers, I responded, "Whoa!" (or words to that effect). Science, I lectured sternly, has established many facts about reality beyond a reasonable doubt, embodied by quantum mechanics, general relativity, the theory of evolution, the genetic code. This knowledge has yielded applications—from vaccines to computer chips—that have transformed our world in countless ways. It is precisely because science is such a powerful mode of knowledge, I said, that you must treat new pronouncements skeptically, carefully distinguishing the genuine from the spurious. But you shouldn’t be so skeptical that you deny the possibility of achieving any knowledge at all.
(15) My students listened politely, but I could see the doubt in their eyes. We professors have a duty to teach our students to be skeptical. But we also have to accept that, if we do our jobs well, their skepticism may turn on us.
Which of the following may be the appropriate title of the passage?
选项
A、The Possible Prospect of Science.
B、Treasuring the Students’ Skepticism.
C、Backfires of Teaching Critical Thinking.
D、Doubting the Endlessness of Science.
答案
C
解析
主旨题。本题需综合全文进行解答。文章开篇提到,作为教师,自己一直鼓励学生保持对科学质疑的精神,随后阐述了作者自己对于一些科学观点的质疑,并列举了一些其他人的质疑观点,从第十一段开始,作者介绍了他的教学效果,即学生提出的质疑大大超出他的想象。而在文章最后,作者明确指出,教会学生质疑,他们可能也会用这种精神来质疑自己的教授,故[C]“教授批判思维的回火”最恰当,回火意指出乎意料、事与愿违的结果。[A]“科学可能的前景”和[D]“质疑科学的无限性”不是作者探讨的主要话题,故排除;而[B]“珍视学生的质疑精神”以偏概全,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0GBK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Toguideyouthroughthepractice,let’sstartwiththebasicquestionsaboutabstract.Firstofall,whatisadescriptiveabst
Toguideyouthroughthepractice,let’sstartwiththebasicquestionsaboutabstract.Firstofall,whatisadescriptiveabst
A、Sheistheleaderofthesorority.B、Sheisalwayshavingherowndramas.C、SheisthebestfriendofKappaD、Sheisapartya
A、Toturnoutanadequatenumberofeliteforthesociety.B、Topreparestudentsfortheirfuturecareer.C、Toofferpracticala
EffectiveNote-takingThedifficultyoftakingnotes:Note-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityduetothe【T1】______ofspoke
EffectiveNote-takingThedifficultyoftakingnotes:Note-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityduetothe【T1】______ofspoke
A、Takingred-eyeflights.B、Orderingdiscounttickets.C、Buyingcheaperticketstodestinationsbeyond.D、Comparingthepriceso
PASSAGEONEWhatdoesMrNasheedthinktobetheconditionofelectionsholding?
(1)Aswehurtletowardsmenewmillennium,whatisthebettersymboloftherelentlesspassageoftimethanmeancientsundial?
PASSAGETHREEWhyisthecampaignofBeatlescarefullydesigned?
随机试题
资料:(1)A公司2009年有关资料如下所示:(2)A公司2008年的税后经营净利率为6.25%,净经营资产净利率为15%,税后利息率为109/5,净财务杠杆为40%。(3)财务费用全部为利息费用。(4)2009年没有增发新股也没有进行股票回
患者女性,40岁。双侧腮腺区反复肿大,伴双眼异物感、无泪、口干,饮水量增加。检查发现双侧腮腺肿大,质软,无压痛;张口度正常,口腔黏膜干燥,发红。腮腺导管口无红肿,分泌液清,但量少。为明确诊断,需进一步作一系列检查,其中对诊断帮助不大的是()
土地增值额超过扣除项目金额200%以上的部分,税率为()。
纳税义务人应当自海关填发税款缴款书之日起15日内向指定银行缴纳税款。缴款期限届满日遇休息日或者法定节假日的,按以下原则调整:
ImaginethesolitudefeltbyMarieSmithbeforeshediedearlierthisyearinhernativeAlaska,at89.Shewasthelastperson
根据以下资料,回答下列题。截至2011年年末,T市城镇职工基本医疗保险参保人员474.52万人,城乡居民基本医疗保险参保人员498.30万人,城镇职工基本养老保险参保人员458.70万人,城乡居民基本养老保险参保人员97.80万人,失业保险参保职
古阳关位于敦煌城西75公里的古董滩上,三面沙丘,沙梁环抱。它与玉门关遥相呼应,像两颗明珠镶嵌在一段汉长城的两端,因在玉门关以南,故名阳关。阳关这样的边塞之地之所以闻名遐迩,并不起始于王维的那首《渭城曲》,而是因为它自汉魏以来就是通往西域诸国最西边防上的重要
下列选项中,符合所给图形的变化规律的是:
PassageTwoWhatdoes"dualstudies"inPara.5mean?
A、Itisaseriousthroattoitscompetitors.B、Itisnotpowerfulenoughtoaffecttheworldmarket.C、Thecars’qualityisgood
最新回复
(
0
)