首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When catastrophic floods hit Bangladesh, TNT’s emergency-response team was ready. The logistics giant, with headquarters in Amst
When catastrophic floods hit Bangladesh, TNT’s emergency-response team was ready. The logistics giant, with headquarters in Amst
admin
2012-03-23
30
问题
When catastrophic floods hit Bangladesh, TNT’s emergency-response team was ready. The logistics giant, with headquarters in Amsterdam, has 50 people on standby to intervene anywhere in the world at 48 hours’ notice. This is part of a five-year-old partnership with the World Food Program (WFP), the UN’s agency that fights hunger. The team has attended to some two dozen emergencies, including the Asian tsunami in 2004. "We’re just faster," says Ludo Oelrich, the director of TNT’s "Moving the World" program. Emergency help is not TNT’s only offering. Volunteers do stints around the world on secondment to WFP and staff are encouraged to raise money for the program (they generated euro2. 5m last year). There is knowledge transfer, too: TNT recently improved the school-food supply chain in Liberia, increasing WFP’s efficiency by 15-20%, and plans to do the same in Congo.
Why does TNT do these things? "People feel this is a company that does more than take care of the bottom line," says Mr. Oelrich. "It’s providing a soul to TNT. " In a 2006 staff survey, 68% said the probono activities made them prouder to work at the company. It also helps with recruitment: three out of four graduates who apply for jobs mention the WFP connection. Last year the company came top in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.
TNT’s experience illustrates several trends in corporate philanthropy. First, collaboration is in, especially with NGOs. Companies try to pick partners with some relevance to their business. For TNT, the food program is a good fit because hunger is in part a logistical problem. Standard Chartered, a bank, is working with the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee on microfinance and with other NGOs on a campaign to help 10m blind people.
Coca-Cola has identified water conservation as critical to its future as the world’s largest drinks company. Last June it announced an ambitious collaboration with WWF, a global environmental organization, to conserve seven major freshwater river basins. It is also working with Greenpeace to eliminate carbon emissions from coolers and vending machines. The co-operation is strictly non-financial, but marks a change in outlook. "Ten years ago you couldn’t get Coca-Cola and Greenpeace in the same room," says Neville Isdell, its CEO.
Second, what used to be local community work is increasingly becoming global community work. In the mid-1990s nearly all IBM’s philanthropic spending was in America; now 60% is outside. Part of this involves a corporate version of the peace corps: young staff get one-month assignments in the developing world to work on worthy projects. The idea is not only to make a difference on the ground, but also to develop managers who understand how wider world works.
Third, once a formal program is in place, it becomes hard to stop. Indeed, it tends to grow, not least because employees are keen. In 1996 KPMG allowed its staff in Britain to spend two hours a month of their paid-for time on work for the community. Crucially for an accountancy firm, the work was given a time code. After a while it came to be seen as a business benefit. The program has expanded to half a day a month and now adds up to 40,000 donated hours a year. And increasingly it is not only inputs that are being measured but outputs as well. Salesforce. com, a software firm, tries to measure the impact of its volunteer programs, which involved 85% of its employees last year.
All this has meant that straightforward cash donations have become less important. At IBM, in 1993 cash accounted for as much as 95% of total philanthropic giving; now it makes up only about 35%. But cash still matters. When Hank Paulson, now America’s treasury secretary, was boss of Goldman Sachs, he was persuaded to raise the amount that the firm chipped in to boost employees’ charitable donations. Now it is starting a philanthropy fund aiming for $1 billion to which the partners will be encouraged to contribute a share of their pay. No doubt that is good for the bank’s soul.
All the followings describe the trends in corporate philanthropy EXCEPT
选项
A、collaborations with NGOs.
B、globalized community work.
C、growth trend of formal programs.
D、increase of both input and output.
答案
D
解析
第7段倒数第2句中increasingly -词修饰的是句中的谓语动词being measured,表示“日益受到衡量”,而D把increase妇为input和output的增加,与原文意思不符,故D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0miO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A______isavarietyoflanguagethatservesasamediumofcommunicationamonggroupsofpeoplefordiverselinguisticbackgro
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue?
Exceptatnight,theyhardlyeverhavetimetogether.HeoftensitsaloneinthehousewaitingforJulie-Julietocomehome.It
WhichofthefollowingworksisNOTwrittenbyWilliamShakespeare?
IsmailKadare,whowasrewardedtheManBooker【M1】______internationalprizeforliteraturethisyear,isthefirst
AustralianTherearetwocommonsetimagesoftheAustralianmale:a)the【1】andNeanderthalmale--greatforabillanda
TheHispanicsmainlyrefertotheethnicpeopleimmigratingtotheU.S.from______.
WhencatastrophicfloodshitBangladesh,TNT’semergency-responseteamwasready.Thelogisticsgiant,withheadquartersinAmst
WhencatastrophicfloodshitBangladesh,TNT’semergency-responseteamwasready.Thelogisticsgiant,withheadquartersinAmst
WhencatastrophicfloodshitBangladesh,TNT’semergency-responseteamwasready.Thelogisticsgiant,withheadquartersinAmst
随机试题
A注册会计师负责审计甲公司2012年财务报表。注册会计师对定期存款应检查的事项中,恰当的有()。
女性,40岁,A型预激综合征患者,突然出现心慌、心悸来诊。心电图示心率180次/分,QRS波群正常,RR间期绝对规则,可见电压交替,QRS波群后隐约见P’,RP’约110ms。该例心动过速是
男性,35岁,讲话中突然剧烈头痛、呕吐,检查:BP140/90mmHg,神志清楚,颈部明显抵抗,四肢肌力正常,双侧Babinski征(-)患者常见的并发症为
阴阳的相互转化是
男,38岁,从事重件手工锻打作业,每次锻打十余分钟。该作业氧消耗的特点是
心绞痛的牵涉痛区是肾结石的牵涉痛区是
男,51岁,重症肺炎患者,入院后次日病情加重,突发持续性呼吸急促,发绀,伴烦躁,呼吸频率38次/分,心率108次/分,律齐,两肺可闻及湿啰音。血气分析:pH7.34,FaO250mmHg,PaCO230mmHg。胸片示两中下肺纹理增多模糊,斑片状阴影,心胸
甲、乙两公司先后向王某出具正式的委托授权书,委托王某为其代理人,授权王某可以和任何单位签订购销合同。王某签订的下列合同中,有效的是()。
下列关于算法复杂度叙述正确的是
YoumaynotlikeEnglish.Ifyoudon’tlikeEnglish,youarenot【11】—manypeople【12】it.Yes,Englishisdifficult.Itisdifficu
最新回复
(
0
)