首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
Family Matters This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parent
admin
2010-02-20
121
问题
Family Matters
This month Singapore passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Singapore Government.
That does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure as un-Asian. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will subvert relations within the family; cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. The law cannot legislate filial responsibility any more than it can legislate love. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Singapore needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to shore it up.
Like many other developed nations, Singapore faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is inexorable. In 1980, 7.2% of the population was in this bracket. By the turn of the century, that figure will grow to 11%. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age per se. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family. This is not a revolutionary concept. Nor is it uniquely Asian. Care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized Societies.
The problem in Singapore is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what of the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support7 They have several options: (a) get a job and work until they die; (b) apply for public assistance (you have to be destitute to apply); or (c) starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept; Asian nations from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who deride the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits mixes the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s -- not society’s -- responsibility to look after his parents. Singapore is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea. It rein-forces the traditional values and it doesn’t hurt a society now and then to remind itself of its core values.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice. Until now, if a person asked family elders, clergymen or the Ministry of Community Development to help get financial support from his children, the most they could do was to mediate. But mediators have no teeth, and a child could simply ignore their pleas.
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace. Few people would be so thick - skinned as to say, "Sue and be damned". The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened. It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the recalcitrant son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.
It would be nice to think that Singapore doesn’t need this kind of law. But that belief ignores the clear demographic trends and the effect of affluence itself on traditional bonds. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an’ incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The author seems to suggest that traditional values _____.
选项
A、play an insignificant role in solving social problems.
B、are helpful to the elderly when they sue their children.
C、are very important in preserving Asian uniqueness.
D、are significant in helping the Bill get approved.
答案
C
解析
作者明显从亚洲传统个性与价值观之间的关系进行比较说明。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0rvO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Planktonsaretoosmalltobeseen.B、Mostplanktonshavetransparenttissues.C、Mostplanktonsarepracticallyinvisibletop
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportantimplicationsforhowmedicineseekstorelievedying
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportantimplicationsforhowmedicineseekstorelievedying
Thebiggestdangerfacingtheglobalairlineindustryisnottheeffectsofterrorism,war,SARSandeconomicdownturn.Itisth
A、Peopleresiststandardization.B、Parentswanttoreducetheweddingcost.C、Manycouplescan’taffordmorethanthepriceofa
A、Theanti-Chinesemovementnationwide.B、ThelawpassedbyCongress.C、Therisinghostilityofwhitemen.D、Thedecreasingjob
A、Brazilianchildrenusuallyhavelunchatschool.B、Brazilianwatchtelevisionalot.C、Braziliansarenormallyverybusy,sot
Stratford-on-Avon,asweallknow,hasonlyoneindustry-WilliamShakespeare-buttherearetwodistinctlyseparateandincreasin
ToparaphraseMartinLutherKing—hereatlast,hereatlast,hereatlast.Almostacenturyaftertheideawasfirstmootedbyb
A、Heallowsthemigrantstostayinhiscountry.B、Herefusestoresumemembershiptalks.C、Hebetrayshispromisestoaidther
随机试题
UPS公司参与电子商务的主要身份是()
A.舌神经B.舌咽神经C.舌下神经D.鼓索神经E.下颌神经支配舌后1/3感觉的是
患者,女性,28岁。因“日晒后面部红斑半年”而就诊。体检可见前发际头发稀疏,面部有不规则圆形红斑,边缘略高出皮面,口腔黏膜有多个浅表溃疡,肝脾轻度肿大。根据患者临床表现及实验室检查,该患者符合美国风湿病学会修订的SLE诊断标准。患者发病可能与下列因素有
患者,男,52岁。有溃疡病史并经常发作,现患者体温38.5℃,需要解热药。请问应选用下列药物中的哪一个比较好
关于瓦屋面的说法,正确的有()。
甲公司对乙公司进行非同—控制下的企业合并,且按照税法规定该项合并为应税合并,所得税率为25%。该项业务的相关资料如下:(1)甲公司于2010年1月2日取得乙公司80%股权,成本为43000万元,购买日乙公司可辨认净资产公允价值总额为49000万元(股本1
下列不属于世界文化遗产的是()。
生物质能是一种新能源。但由于目前其利用受到土地资源等多方面限制,发展前景还不是很广阔。这段话主要支持了这样一种论点,即生物质能()。
“鹤立鸡群”中的“鹤”和“万绿丛中一点红”中的“红”容易被人们知觉到,这种现象所体现的知觉特性是()。(2013年)
二进制数1lOOOO转换成十六进制数是
最新回复
(
0
)