首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
admin
2015-01-09
40
问题
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is we are terrible at predicting the source of joy. And whatever choices we do make, we likely later decide it was all for the best.
These are insights from happiness economics, perhaps the hottest field in what used to be called the dismal science. Happiness is everywhere-on the best-seller lists, in the minds of policymakers, and front and center for economists-yet it remains elusive. The golden rule of economics has always been that well-being is a simple function of income. That’s why nations and people alike strive for higher incomes-money gives us choice and a measure of freedom. After a certain income can, we simply don’t get any happier. And it isn’t what we have, but whether we have more than our neighbor, that really matters. So the news last week that in 2006 top hedge-fund managers took home $ 240 million, minimum, probably didn’t make them any happier, it just made the rest of us less so.
Now policymakers are racing to figure out what makes people happy, and just how they should deliver it. Countries as diverse as Bhutan, Australia, China, Thailand and the U.K. are coming up with "happiness indexer," to be used alongside GDP as a guide to society’s progress. In Britain, the "politics of happiness" will likely figure prominently in next year’s elections. Never mind that the world’s top happiness researchers recently gathered at a conference in Rome to debate whether joy is even measurable.
Why is this all happening now? Only in the last decade have economists, psychologists, biologists and philosophers begun cross-pollinating in such a way to arrive at "happiness studies." Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert humorously sums up much of the new wisdom in his book "Stumbling on Happiness." He says 24-hour television and the Internet have allowed us all to see more seemingly happy people than ever before." We’re surrounded by the lifestyles of the rich and famous," says Gilbert, "rubbing our noses in the fact that others have more."
Of course, the idea that money isn’t the real key to happiness isn’t new. The 18th-centry British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham argued that public policy should try to maximize happiness, and many prominent economists agreed but could not quite embrace the idea. There was just no way to measure happiness objectively.
One of the early revelations of happiness research, from Richard Easterlin at the University of Southern California, was that while the rich are typically happier than the poor, the happiness boost from extra cash isn’t that great once one rises above the poverty line. The reason, says Easterlin, is the "hedonic cycle": we get used to being richer dam quick, and take it for granted or compare it to what others have, not what we used to have. Turns out, keeping up with the Joneses is hard-wired into our brains, thanks to our pack-creature roots.
Though many happiness researchers say "work less, play more" is the formula for happiness, Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, suggests otherwise. Hard-working Americans ranks 17th on his list; the hard-vacationing French 39th. Human beings do want a European-style safety net, but also want freedom and opportunity.
And perhaps our intuitions about happiness should triumph over the fuzzy data, anyway. The economics of happiness has given us a couple of fairly hard and fast rules about well-being-being truly poor is bad, and time with friends and family are good The good news is that whatever choices we make individually and as societies in the pursuit of happiness there’s good chance that they’ll seem better in hindsight. Yet another truism of happiness is that "we all wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to our past decision-making," says Gilbert. Today’s dreadful life choice will likely be tomorrow’s happy accident.
Directions: The passage below summarizes the main points of the passage. Read the summary and then select the best word or phrase from the box blow according to the passage. You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on the ANSWER SHEET with a single line through the center.
[*]
We are poor at prevision of the origin of hapiness, and we would probably believe the decision we made is the most satisfactory. The Happiness has become【R1】______everywhere but tough to define. Nations and people manage to gain higher incomes based on the principle of economics that【R2】______are related to hapiness, but that is not【R3】______. Wealth alone isn’t necessarily what makes us happy. It makes different if we possess more than【R4】______, and that’s why we feel unhappy to find those top【R5】______have superlative income. Some nations are beginning to consider issues like measuring society’s progress by【R6】______as well as GDP, and researchers held seminar to exchange surveys about the【R7】______, though the influential topic was advanced 10 years ago. The issue that a state policy should be【R8】______the happiness of the majority, erupted many decades ago by British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham and accepted by many eminent economists, could not fairly【R9】______, because happiness can not be objectively measured. The【R10】______of the happiness made by Richard Easterlin is that the wealth makes people happier, but their happiness will not【R11】______as great as it should be if they live above the【R12】______. The can easily take the life for granted and【R13】______the more expansive way of life. They are【R14】______to compare the life with others and manage to keep up with the Joneses. Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, does not support the【R15】______"work less, play more". According to his investigation of happiness list, people want a Europen-style【R16】______and want to enjoy freedom and opportunity as well. We should probably go beyond the confusing information and【R17】______the fairly principies of the happiness: poverty is【R18】______, staying with friends and family is【R19】______, and the decisions made【R20】______are by chance to be happy experience.
【R3】
选项
答案
H
解析
从文中第二段可以知道,将收入与幸福相连接并不是衡量幸福的标准。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0uQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Withitsstockpricerisingby20percent,thecompanybecomesthesecondmost______.
Muchhasbeenwrittenaboutpovertybutnoneoftheaccountsseemtogetattherootoftheproblem.Itmustbenotedthatthew
Rabiesisallordinarilyinfectiousdiseaseofthecentralnervoussystem.Itiscausedbyavirusand,【C1】______arule,spread
Thehistoryofmodernpollutionproblemsshowsthatmosthaveresultedfromnegligenceandignorance.Wehaveanappallingtende
AnumberofbookslikeReadingFacesandBodyLanguagehave【C1】______theindividual’stendencytobroadcastthingsthroughallm
ThedomesticeconomyintheUnitedStatesexpandedinaremarkablyvigorousandsteadyfashion.Therevivalinconsumerconfiden
Advertisingispaid,nonpersonalcommunicationthatisdesignedtocommunicateinacreativemanner,throughtheuseofmassor
人与人之间的差别在于他们对待事物的不同态度。有人按照事物的颜色、大小、外形来区分事物,有人根据事物内在的特点、因果关系来区分事物。有人可能更关注事物之间的内在区别,而忽略了事物之间一些外在的差异。对待事物的不同态度决定了人们处理问题的不同方法。
Heistheonlypersonwhocan______inthiscase,becausetheotherwitnesseswerekilledmysteriously.
A、edgeB、rimC、lipD、brinkD本题考核的知识点是of结构+名词辨析。四个选项不是动词的名词化,因此考查的是修饰关系。本题测试点为固定搭配。onthebrinkof意为“在…的边缘”,所以应选D。一些经济学家担心德国处于经济衰
随机试题
皮下脂肪的良性肿瘤多呈
外科病人有低钾血症者,采取补钾措施时,下列哪项是不正确的()
根据《医疗用毒性药品管理办法》,关于医疗机构使用医疗用毒性药品的说法,正确的是
王某与周某结婚时签订书面协议,约定婚后所得财产归各自所有。周某婚后即辞去工作在家奉养公婆,照顾小孩。王某长期在外地工作,后与李某同居,周某得知后向法院起诉要求离婚。周某的下列哪些请求不能得到法院的支持?()
财务管理环境是指对企业财务活动和财务管理产生影响作用的企业各种外部条件的统称。()
常模样本量的大小,一般最低不小于( )。
能够从上述资料中推出的是()。
世界多极化格局有利于遏制霸权主义和强权政治,有利于推动建立公正合理的国际政治经济新秩序,有利于发展中国家抓住机遇、发展自己。()
以下哪一个是用户仅可以在本地内部网络中使用的专用IP地址?______。
Completeeachsentencewiththecorrectending,A-Gbelow.Writethecorrectletter,A-G,inboxes32-37onyouranswersheet.L
最新回复
(
0
)