首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme
admin
2013-03-27
52
问题
On January 11th, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom—on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme Court. Perry v. Schwarzenegger challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California referendum that, in November 2008, overturned a state Supreme Court decision allowing same-sex couples to marry. Its lead lawyers are unlikely allies; Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general under President George W. Bush, and a prominent conservative; and David Boies, the Democratic trial lawyer who was his opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore. The two are mounting an ambitious case that pointedly circumvents the incremental, narrowly crafted legal gambits and the careful state-by-state strategy, leading gay-rights organizations have championed in the fight for marriage equality. The Olson-Boies team hopes for a ruling that will transform the legal and social landscape nationwide, something on the order of Brown v. Board of Education, in 1954, or Loving v.Virginia, the landmark 1967 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.
Olson’s interest in this case has puzzled quite a few people. What’s in it for him? Is he sincere? Does he really think he can sway the current Court? But when I spoke with Olson, who is sixty-nine, in early December, he sounded confident and impassioned; the case clearly fascinated him both as an intellectual challenge and as a way to make history. "The Loving case was forty-two years ago," he said, perched on the edge of his chair in the law offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, in Washington, D.C., where he is a partner. "It’s inconceivable to us these days to say that a couple of a different racial background can’t get married. " Olson wore a brightly striped shirt and a paisley tie, without a jacket; there was something folksy in his speech, which reminded me that he’s a Westerner, who grew up and was educated in Northern California. He said, "Separate is not equal. Civil unions and domestic partnerships are not the same as marriage. We’re not inventing any new right, or creating a new right, or asking the courts to recognize a new right. The Supreme Court has said over and over and over again that marriage is a fundamental right, and although our opponents say, ’Well, that’s always been involving a man and a woman,’ when the Supreme Court has talked about it, they’ve said it’s an associational right, it’s a liberty right, it’s a privacy right, and it’s an expression of your identity, which is all wrapped up in the Constitution. " "The Justices of the Supreme Court", Olson said, "are individuals who will consider this seriously, and give it good attention," and he was optimistic that he could persuade them.(The losing side in San Francisco will likely appeal to the Ninth Circuit, and from there the case could proceed to the Supreme Court.)Olson’s self-assurance has a sound basis: he has argued fifty-six cases before the high court—he was one of the busiest lawyers before the Supreme Court bench last year—and prevailed in forty-four of them. Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy attended his wedding three years ago, in Napa. Olson said that he wanted the gay-marriage case to be a "teaching opportunity, so people will listen to us talk about the importance of treating people with dignity and respect and equality and affection and love and to stop discriminating against people on the basis of sexual orientation. "
If the Perry case succeeds before the Supreme Court, it could mean that gay marriage would be permitted not only in California but in every state. And, if the Court recognized homosexuals as indistinguishable from heterosexuals for the purposes of marriage law, it would be hard, if not impossible, to uphold any other laws that discriminated against people on the basis of sexual orientation. However, a loss for Olson and Boies could be a major setback to the movement for marriage equality. Soon after Olson and Boies filed the case, last May, some leading gay-rights organizations—among them the A. C. L. U. , Human Rights Campaign, Lambda Legal, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights— issued a statement condemning such efforts. The odds of success for a suit weren’t good, the groups said, because the "Supreme Court typically does not get too far ahead of either public opinion or the law in the majority of states. " The legal precedent that these groups were focused on wasn’t Loving v. Virginia but, rather, Bowers v. Hardwick, the 1986 Supreme Court decision that stunned gay-rights advocates by upholding Georgia’s antiquated law against sodomy. It was seventeen years before the Court was willing to revisit the issue, in Lawrence v. Texas, though by then only thirteen states still had anti-sodomy statutes; this time, the Court overturned the laws, with a 6-3 vote and an acerbic dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, who declared that the Court had aligned itself with the "homosexual agenda," adding, "Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children’s schools, or as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. "
Seventeen years was a long time to wait. "A loss now may make it harder to go to court later," the activists’ statement read. "It will take us a lot longer to get a good Supreme Court decision if the Court has to overrule itself. " Besides, the groups argued, "We lost the right to marry in California at the ballot box. That’s where we need to win it back. " Plenty of gay-marriage supporters agreed that it was smarter to wait until the movement had been successful in more states—and, possibly, the composition of the Supreme Court had shifted.(During the last year of a second Obama term, Scalia would be eighty-one.)
Some leading gay-rights organizations did not support the case because______.
选项
A、it was impossible to win the case
B、they would have to wait for longer if the case was lost this time as it’s hard for the Supreme Court to overrule itself
C、they did not believe the ability of the leading lawyers
D、unlike interracial marriage, it’s harder to get support for same-sex marriage
答案
B
解析
根据倒数第二段可知答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4XmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninter
Thegovernmentprovidesemploymentandtrainingservicesforworkersand______forthosewhoaretemporarilyoutofwork.
In1993,amallsecuritycameracapturedashakyimageoftwo10-year-oldboysleadingamuchsmallerboyoutofaLiverpool,En
"ItwasthebeginningofarevolutioninAmericaandtheworld,arevolutionthatsomehaveyettoacknowledgeandmanyhaveyet
71.Notsolongagoitwasassumedthatthedangersmanwouldmeetinspacewouldbeterrible,themainonesbeingradiationand
Perhapsallcriminalsshouldberequiredtocarrycardswhichread;Fragile;HandlewithCare.Itwillneverso,thesedaystog
Oneofthemajordifferencesbetweenmanandhisclosestlivingrelativeis,ofcourse,thatthechimpanzeehasnotdevelopedthe
InarecentbookentitledThePsychicLifeofInsects,ProfessorBouviersaysthatwemustbecarefulnottocreditthelittlew
Aparticularareainwhichassumptionsandvaluesdifferbetweenculturesisthatoffriendship.FriendshipsamorigAmericanste
Formostofhumanhistory,thedominantconcernsaboutenergyhavecenteredonthebenefitside.Inadequacyofenergyresources
随机试题
下列数字扫描变换器(DSC)所实现的功能哪个是错误的()
常用深吸气后屏气方式摄影的部位是
一头奶牛,5岁,最近表现转圈运动,触诊额骨变薄、松软,皮肤隆起。该动物接受治疗时需要用到的特殊器械是
关于卖出看涨期权,下列说法正确的有()。Ⅰ.当标的物市场价格小于执行价格时,卖方风险随着标的物价格下跌而增加Ⅱ.标的物价格窄幅整理对其有利Ⅲ.当标的物市场价格大于执行价格时,卖方风险随着标的物价格上涨而增加Ⅳ.标的物价格大幅震荡
甲企业2007年的普通股和长期借款资金分别为1500万元和900万元,资金成本分别为18%和8%。2008年度拟再向银行借入600万元,年利率为12%,筹资费用率为2%;预计借款后企业的股票价格变为每股30元,年末每股股利4元,股利增长率为2%。若企业适
以学生发展为本的课程,要求把课程改革建立在脑科学研究、心理学研究和()研究的基础之上,把学生的发展作为课程开发的着眼点和目标。
1903年,美国心理学家()出版了《教育心理学》,这是西方第一本以“教育心理学”命名的专著。
【2013.云南昭通】有一所小学,从小学一年级开始抓分数,把学生考分作为评定三好学生的唯一标准,把各种平均分数作为评定各科教师教育质量的全部依据。学校不开设体育、音乐、美术课,也很少进行思想品德教育,几乎所有时间都是上语文、数学课。在这种情况下,学生体质普
故都的秋(节选)郁达夫秋天,无论在什么地方的秋天,总是好的;可是啊,北国的秋,却特别地来得清,来得静,来得悲凉。我的不远千里,要从杭州赶上青岛,更要从青岛赶上北平来的理由,也不过想饱尝一尝这“秋”,这故都的秋味。江南,秋当然也
Itiseasytodeterminewhethersmokingishazardous.Nicotineispoisonous.
最新回复
(
0
)