首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
32
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0zKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
Themostobviousandrapidchangeinthedevelopmentofalanguagetakesplaceintheareaof______.
AllofthefollowingstatementsabouterroranalysisaretrueEXCEPTthat______.
Thereiswidespreadconsensusamongscholarsthatsecondlanguageacquisition(MB1SLA)emergedasadistinctfieldofresearchfro
AccordingtoMagdalenaAlvarez,atleast______survivorsdiedhoursaftertheaccident.
Americaneconomistsoncespoofeduniversityeducationastheonlyindustryinwhichthosewhoconsumeitsproductdonotpurchas
A、TheyareseldommentionedbymassmediaB、Theydon’texpressthemselvesC、Theyhavetosacrificemanythingswhicharepartso
ThemajorityofpoeminLyricalBalladswerewrittenby______.
Becauseoftelevisionandworldwidecomputerconnections,peoplecannowbecomefamiliarwithagreatmanyplacesthattheyhave
Oneofthefirstthingsthatshouldstrikeanyhalfobservantparentisthespeedandapparentaccuracyinwhichachildproceed
随机试题
分化型甲状腺癌转移灶经治疗后,131I显像阴性,而18F-FDG显像阳性,此提示
患者,男性,25岁。外出打工多个月,突起右下腹痛,短时间便觉全腹痛,半个月前曾有过“感冒”,表现发热、头痛、四肢酸痛、食欲缺乏,在当地医院门诊按“上呼吸道感染”服药治疗过。查体:全腹压痛及反跳痛,肠鸣音消失。最可能的临床诊断为
女,22岁,初产妇。孕41周,规律宫缩8小时后宫口开大8cm,自然破裂,破膜后突然呼吸困难,发绀,血压下降。最可能的诊断是()
A.Ⅰ型高脂蛋白血症B.Ⅱa型高脂蛋白血症C.Ⅱb型高脂蛋白血症D.Ⅲ型高脂蛋白血症E.Ⅳ型高脂蛋白血症
社会环境对个体的客观要求所引起的需要与个体发展水平之间的矛盾运动,是推动个体由自然人向社会人转变的动力。
仁爱礁是中国固有领土,是不争事实。近段时间以来,菲律宾蓄意炒作仁爱礁问题,一意孤行地为菲方推进国际仲裁造势,是为了掩盖其非法侵占中国领土和挑起事端的本质,是滥用国际法律手段的政治挑衅。中国政府明确表态,绝不会容许菲方以任何形式侵占仁爱礁,不会接受也不会参与
作为会议主持人,首先要明确()。
在实际工作中。有人即便工作负担很重。也不会告诉领导,而有人没干什么工作,却经常一大堆抱怨。对此,你打算如何处理?
CPU执行指令时,要先根据(1)将指令从内存读取并送入(2),然后译码并执行。(2)
设关系R、S和T如下。关系T是由关系R和S经过哪种操作得到的?
最新回复
(
0
)