首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
admin
2015-01-09
75
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much.
The author find Barbara King’s book
选项
A、persuasive.
B、surprising.
C、suspicious.
D、unconvincing.
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干中的Barbara King’s book定位到第九、十段。第九段最后一句提到,Barbara King的书写的主要是一系列轶事,此外,第十段最后一句作者明确说他认为大多数读者会承认这本书从开始论述的就是一个既定的事实,总结这两处不难看出,作者认为Barbara King的书是没有说服力的,因此选择[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/15dO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
GuoXue,orthestudiesofChineseancientcivilization,includingphilosophy,history,archaeology,literature,linguistics,et
Overthepastdecade,DINK(DoubleIncomesNoKids)hasbeenalifestylepursuedbyanincreasingamountofwesternersandhas
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
IntroductoryLecturetoUniversityStudyInordertoadjustwelltouniversitylife,freshmenusuallyhavetounderstandthe
IntroductoryLecturetoUniversityStudyInordertoadjustwelltouniversitylife,freshmenusuallyhavetounderstandthe
IntroductoryLecturetoUniversityStudyInordertoadjustwelltouniversitylife,freshmenusuallyhavetounderstandthe
随机试题
某种化工材料进口数量激增,已经导致国内生产同类产品及与其直接竞争的产品的化工厂受到严重损害。根据对外贸易法律制度的规定,下列说法正确的是()。
用哇巴因抑制钠泵活动后,细胞功能发生的变化有()(2008年)
医师最先采取的步骤是为鉴别与妊娠有关的疾病,最可靠的检查为
虚开增值税专用发票骗取出口退税,数额特别巨大,情节特别严重,给国家利益造成特别重大损失,依照
“杂施而不孙,则坏乱而不修”违背了()教学原则。
四人年龄为相邻的自然数列且最年长者不超过30岁,四人年龄之乘积能被2700整除且不能被81整除。则四人中最年长者多少岁?
更衣:游泳:洗澡
左边给定的是纸盒外表面的展开图,右边哪一项能由它折叠而成?
证明:当χ>0时,χ2>(1+χ)ln2(1+χ).
设f(x)在[a,b]上连续,在(a,b)内二阶可导,f(a)=f(b)=0,且f′+(a)>0.证明:存在ξ∈(a,b),使得f″(ξ)<0.
最新回复
(
0
)