首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
admin
2014-01-07
56
问题
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christians probably do not realize is that, until recently, other than David’s occurrence in the Bible, there has never been actual proof that he ever existed. Over the years this has given fuel to certain groups wishing to view the Bible as a huge trip into the allegorical. However, all of this changed in 1993. Recently, your author learned for the first time what I am going to attempt to tell about here. You might think that given your faith, it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not. But think for a moment of the implications of our Bible being definitively proven by actual physical evidence. It would be like having your cake, and someone putting icing on it!!!
In 1993(as told in the March/April 1994 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review), Avraham Biran and his team of archaeologists unearthed a piece of stone with fragments of writing on it. In the writings was the words "House of David". It was the first mention of David in ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fragment was found at Tel Dan which lies by the head waters of the Jordan River, near Israel’s northern border. The large piece of basalt was part of what must have been a large monumental inscription. It contains 13 lines, but no single line is complete. The surviving letters are clear, however. Line 9 contains the words "House of David". After the complete translation, it was determined that the fragment was part of a victory stela erected in Dan by an Aramean boasting a military victory over the House of David. Many questions are raised as well as many possibilities upon comparing the fragment with the Biblical history. For instance the victory of the Aramean would conflict with the episode in the Bible. However as BAR points out, there were probably many battles and not all were recorded in the Bible. We do know that Israel must have regained control of Dan. This find would perhaps seem simple and to the point, but that is far from the truth. The find began a debate in earnest.
Immediately following the find, many came forward to state that the stone did not actually mention the "House of David." Along with this claim came the accusation that those believing that it did mention David were "Biblical Maximizers." The arguing was fast and furious. The debate inspired letters to the editors displaying the anger, emotion, and dismay from Christians. How could this new proof be denied? While the verbal debate raged, researchers and scientists quietly built a case on the very evidence the naysayers demanded. Another scholar, Andre’ Lemaire wrote an article in BAR stating that there was another mention of David in an earlier find. It was called the Mesha Stela proclaiming victory for the Moabite king Mesha over the Israelites.
Then in the Impact section of our own The State in December of last year, an article appeared proclaiming that scientists have found that the Bible is built on facts as well as faith. Many fragments have been found in the same area, all mentioning David. Finally, scholars have reached the consensus that David was real, something many of us have never doubted, even before the stelas were found. Although scholars are not ready to admit the Bible is historically true across the board, they are willing to concede that the "Bible has a sound historical core." One thing is certain, these finds don’t only have repercussions in a religious sense, they reach into many domains—political, personal faith, historical. I can’t say in learning about these finds that my faith has grown any stronger, I can say that I have a new appreciation for the Bible as an accurate historical record as well as a basis of faith.
King David’s only occurrence in the Bible has prompted some people to regard the Bible as
选项
A、the most sacred book.
B、merely a storybook.
C、a spiritual journey.
D、a record of history.
答案
B
解析
根据题干中的King David’s only occurrence in the Bible定位到第1段第4句。原文该句中的the allegorical表明有些人将《圣经》当作一本寓言故事,因此本题应选B。即使不懂allegorical一词,从上一句的内容也可以知道第4句说的是对《圣经》持怀疑态度的人,这样,其他三项都可以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/18FK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
AccordingtotheOxfamreport,thenext20yearswillsee______percentincreaseintheneedforfood.
Accordingtothenews,whatisthemainreasonforChina’srapideconomicgrowth?
Howdidthemanspendhislastweekend?
Job-huntingisatoughchallengetothegraduates.Someonesaysgraduationmeansthecomingofunemployment.Provideyouropinio
WhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueaccordingtothepassage?
IntheU.S.,collegesareeitherstate-supported,supportedbyreligiousorganizations,orprivately______.
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
AlthoughIliketheappearanceofthehouse,whatreallymademedecidetobuyitwasthebeautiful______throughthewindow.
Withoutthefrictionbetweentheirfeetandtheground,peoplewould______beabletowalk.
Bosseswoulddowelltobealarmed.Novemberishere,andwithitagoodchancethatthebackofficeisn’tprocessingdata,but
随机试题
简述碘量法测定溶解氧的原理及化学反应方程式。
“上有政策,下有对策”有悖于公共政策有效执行的()
诊断急性脑血管病首选的检查项目为
在最近()年内有骗取中标或严重违约或重大工程质量问题的单位,应拒绝作为资格预审申请人。
在大体积混凝土施工中,掺入粉煤灰的目的是()
某教师组织一次“沉和浮”的科学活动,目标是让幼儿对物体质量与沉浮之间的关系有一个感性的认识和了解,其活动内容是让幼儿尝试把一个铁块放进水里观察沉浮,活动后大家对该活动提出了很多的意见。该活动的主要问题在于()
Threehundredyearsagonewstravelledbywordofmouthorletter,andcirculatedintavernsandcoffeehousesintheformofpa
Mr.andMrs.RajahHassimweregoingtoeatout.Mr.Hassimtelephonedinthemorningandreserved(预定)atableinSpringRestaur
TheParliamentofAustraliaiscomposedof_____and_____.
A、Itwassetupinthatyear.B、Itjoinedwithanothercompany.C、Itsent10,000peopleabroad.D、Itrecruitedalotofnewstaf
最新回复
(
0
)