首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
admin
2010-12-21
108
问题
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on September 11 th 2001, may be more likely than others. Who would pay for the millions in property damage, business losses and other claims from such an attack?
This is the question with which America’s Congress is currently wrestling. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was passed as a temporary measure after September 11th to provide a government back-stop for the insurance industry in the event of a catastrophic attack. It now says government can step in when insured losses from a terrorist event top $5m. TRIA has helped to stabilize the market, and enabled insurers to continue offering terrorism-risk cover even after swallowing the big losses imposed by September llth. But unless Congress acts last, TRIA will expire at the end of the year. One likely result is the loss of terrorism-risk cover for thousands of firms and property owners. This, in turn, could disrupt businesses and make some commercial activity impossible. With modifications, TRIA should be extended.
The Bush administration has been opposed to extension. It has always seen TRIA as a short-term measure, and has argued that the private sector should assume sole responsibility for terrorism insurance. This is the right goal. A purely private solution would be best, lifting any future burden-from the taxpayer and relying on the industry to price and spread risks more accurately than any government can do. But relying entirely on the private sector immediately does not look feasible. With TRIA’s expiration looming, insurers and reinsurers have not, as the administration expected, rushed to write new contracts for next year offering to fall gaps in terrorism cover.
Why the hesitation? Unlike other risks, the threat of terrorism cannot be forecast in time or scope, making a mocker’:" of insurers’ underwriting models. A big chemical, biological or nuclear attack is a prospect few can price, or afford to cover. Insurers are already being threatened with downgrades by rating agencies for the terrorism cover they have sold.
One reason is that insurance, far from being a free market, is already one of the most heavily regulated of industries. Operating in a highly distorted marketplace, with 50 state regulators, the insurance industry seems to be having trouble pricing the largest of terrorism risks in a way that is credible and can still offer insurers a profit. Letting TRIA expire, and abruptly withdrawing the government role in insuring the largest losses, would just exacerbate this problem.
Any renewal of TRIA should, once again, be limited to two years, say. Its extension must also shift more of the burden, and the business, to the private sector. If an extension is agreed and TRIA’s threshold for government intervention is raised substantially, work should begin now to find better longer-term solutions. One place to look is abroad, where governments have dealt with terrorism risk for years. In Britain, for instance, insurers have created a pool of capital that is backed by the government and, over time, shifts a greater share of risk on to the private sector. Other options to consider include tax changes that reduce the cost of holding capital by insurers and reinsurers, and facilitating the use of catastrophe bonds.
With fewer regulatory distortions of insurance markets, a solely private solution may be attainable in the long run. In the current environment, though, the same government that regularly warns of terrorist threats must still have a role to play in a solution that safeguards America’s financial security. It would be better to plan ahead than wait for a rushed, Katrina-style bail-out after a big attack. Amid all the uncertainties, one thing seems clear: any such bail-out would be more costly and lead to even greater market distortions without an extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act today.
If the government let TRIA expire, ______.
选项
A、it should stop warning the public of terrorist attacks regularly
B、it will have to pay more money when large scale catastrophe occurs
C、regulatory distortions of insurance markets will be reduced
D、private insurance companies will stop insuring terrorism attacks
答案
B
解析
根据最后一段的“without an extension of TRIA,灾难发生后,any such bail-out would be more costly(政府的应急措施花费将会更高),而市场失真度也会更严重”,可判断,选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/1Hua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Oneofthemajorpleasuresinlifeisappetite,andoneofourmajordutiesshouldbetopreserveit.Appetiteisthekeennesso
Light-weightingandnewengineandfueltechnologiesarehelpingtomakeexistingroadandrailvehiclesmoreefficient.However
carbonfootprint
Wetendtothinkofgoodfortuneasarandomactofkindnessfromtheuniverse.Certainlythatissometimestrue:Serendipityor
Countriesborderedbytheseahaveapleasant______climatebecausetheseawarmsthecoastinwinterandcoolsitinsummer.
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportant______forhowmedicineseekstorelievedyingpatie
Myreadinginlaterlifehassuppliedmewithsomepossibleexplanationsofhis______.
Georgehadstolensomemoney,butthepolicehadcaughthimandhehadbeenputinprison.Nowhistrialwasabouttobegin,and
DiscussionoftheassimilationofPuertoRicansintheUnitedStateshasfocusedontwofactors:socialstandingandthelossof
Inspiteofhis______appearance,hismovementswereasspiritedasayoungman’s.
随机试题
下表是一张()。
心阳虚型虚劳治疗时应
男性,70岁,因胸闷、心前区疼痛2小时入院。体检:神志欠清,大汗,BP8/5.3kPa(60/40mmHg),HR112次/min,血糖16.1mmol/L,ECG示左室侧壁心肌梗死。有高血压史,否认糖尿病史,对血糖增高的处理下列哪项是正确的
与影响钙吸收无关的因素是
依据水利工程招标投标有关规定,潜在投标人依据踏勘项目现场及招标人介绍情况做出的判断和决策,由()负责。
旅游休闲是人民分享改革开放成果、体验()的重要载体。
甲公司与乙公司订立买卖合同,双方约定,甲公司应于2012年9月1日向乙公司交付货物,乙公司应于9月8日向甲公司交付货款。8月底,甲公司发现乙公司经营状况严重恶化,并有确切证据可以证明。9月1日届至,甲公司()。
下列选项中,属于政府直接干预经济的是:
基本公共服务均等化
设向量组α1=(1,1,1,3)T,α2=(-1,-3,5,1)T,α3=(3,2,-1,p+2)T,α4=(-2,-6,10,p)T,p为何值时,该向量组线性无关?并在此时将α=(4,1,6,10)T用α1,α2,α3,α4线性表出.
最新回复
(
0
)