首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
admin
2014-01-07
56
问题
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christians probably do not realize is that, until recently, other than David’s occurrence in the Bible, there has never been actual proof that he ever existed. Over the years this has given fuel to certain groups wishing to view the Bible as a huge trip into the allegorical. However, all of this changed in 1993. Recently, your author learned for the first time what I am going to attempt to tell about here. You might think that given your faith, it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not. But think for a moment of the implications of our Bible being definitively proven by actual physical evidence. It would be like having your cake, and someone putting icing on it!!!
In 1993(as told in the March/April 1994 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review), Avraham Biran and his team of archaeologists unearthed a piece of stone with fragments of writing on it. In the writings was the words "House of David". It was the first mention of David in ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fragment was found at Tel Dan which lies by the head waters of the Jordan River, near Israel’s northern border. The large piece of basalt was part of what must have been a large monumental inscription. It contains 13 lines, but no single line is complete. The surviving letters are clear, however. Line 9 contains the words "House of David". After the complete translation, it was determined that the fragment was part of a victory stela erected in Dan by an Aramean boasting a military victory over the House of David. Many questions are raised as well as many possibilities upon comparing the fragment with the Biblical history. For instance the victory of the Aramean would conflict with the episode in the Bible. However as BAR points out, there were probably many battles and not all were recorded in the Bible. We do know that Israel must have regained control of Dan. This find would perhaps seem simple and to the point, but that is far from the truth. The find began a debate in earnest.
Immediately following the find, many came forward to state that the stone did not actually mention the "House of David." Along with this claim came the accusation that those believing that it did mention David were "Biblical Maximizers." The arguing was fast and furious. The debate inspired letters to the editors displaying the anger, emotion, and dismay from Christians. How could this new proof be denied? While the verbal debate raged, researchers and scientists quietly built a case on the very evidence the naysayers demanded. Another scholar, Andre’ Lemaire wrote an article in BAR stating that there was another mention of David in an earlier find. It was called the Mesha Stela proclaiming victory for the Moabite king Mesha over the Israelites.
Then in the Impact section of our own The State in December of last year, an article appeared proclaiming that scientists have found that the Bible is built on facts as well as faith. Many fragments have been found in the same area, all mentioning David. Finally, scholars have reached the consensus that David was real, something many of us have never doubted, even before the stelas were found. Although scholars are not ready to admit the Bible is historically true across the board, they are willing to concede that the "Bible has a sound historical core." One thing is certain, these finds don’t only have repercussions in a religious sense, they reach into many domains—political, personal faith, historical. I can’t say in learning about these finds that my faith has grown any stronger, I can say that I have a new appreciation for the Bible as an accurate historical record as well as a basis of faith.
According to the second paragraph, the first mention of David outside the Bible was found
选项
A、on a monument.
B、outside David’s house.
C、about David’s victory in a war.
D、in the Jordan River.
答案
A
解析
第2段第9句中的stela是一个生词,结合上下文和下一段第1句中的the stone可以推断victorystela是一个“胜利纪念碑”,因此本题应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/28FK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Job-huntingisatoughchallengetothegraduates.Someonesaysgraduationmeansthecomingofunemployment.Provideyouropinio
Thesimpleactofsurrenderingatelephonenumbertoastoreclerkmaynotseemharmful—somuchsothatmanyconsumersdoitwit
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
AsimplepieceofropehangsbetweensomeenvironmentallyfriendlyAmericansandtheirneighbors.Ononesidestandthosewhoha
Paintinghasbeencontinuouslypracticedbyhumansforsome20,000years.Togetherwithotheractivities【C1】______ritualisticin
What’stheseriousproblemthedevelopingcountriesface?
Sunspotsactlikeplanet-sizedhurricanesthatsuckinasmuchmaterialastheyspewout,temporarilyoverridingthelawsofmag
InTheArtofChoosing,SheenaIyengar,abusinessprofessoratColumbiaUniversityandaleadingexpertondecisionmaking,tel
SprintCorp.launchedapaye-mailservicewithYahooInc.foritsmobilephonecustomers,asthecompanieslooktotapintothe
Thethreeworld’srichestindustrialcountriesare______.
随机试题
下列权利中不属于民事权利的是()。
测定酶活性的必要条件是
专用架桥机可按()的不同进行分类
我国《合同法》规定,当事人在合同中既约定了违约金,又约定了定金的,一方违约时,另一方()。
()的出版标志着规范教育学的建立。
下面发生了学习的情形是
甲、乙、丙为兄弟关系,另无兄弟姐妹,均未结婚,父母死亡时,未留有遗嘱,故该房屋为三人共同继承,虽房屋登记在乙名义下,但实际上为三人共有。2006年4月,甲外出经商,房屋由乙照看,乙因赌博欠债,无力还款,竟以自己名义将该房屋出卖给丁,双方签订了买卖合同,约定
详细设计属于软件的哪个阶段?()
____________(还要更长时间)beforeyougraduatefromcollege?
Impressionismisaformofartthatbeganinthe1870’s.Whenyoulookcloselyatanimpressionistpainting,youseelittledots
最新回复
(
0
)