首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
68
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the word "negligence" mean in the passage?
选项
A、ignorance
B、arrogance
C、carelessness
D、depression
答案
C
解析
根据文中第三段的“Mr.Farwell,an engineer,lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track.”可知:法威尔先生是铁路部门的名工程师。当名扳道工因疏忽而导致车头脱离轨道时,法威尔失去了右手。从中可以推知,negligence意为“疏忽,过失”。四个选项中,ignorance意为“无知,愚昧”,arrogance意为“傲慢”,carelessness意为“粗心,疏忽”,depression意为“沮丧;经济大萧条”。据此可知,C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/36TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Everytimeapersoneatssomethinghemakesanutritionaldecision.Heacceptsorrejectsthefoodavailabletohimathomefor
Atthesametime,medicalandsocialscienceresearchbegantoindicatethatretirementitselfhaddetrimentaleffects.
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
ManycountrieswillnotallowcigaretteadvertisingintheirnewspapersoronTVespeciallysincetheadvertisementsareusually
ManycountrieswillnotallowcigaretteadvertisingintheirnewspapersoronTVespeciallysincetheadvertisementsareusually
Vacationpoliciescontinuetobeasourceof______betweenmanagementandtheworkers.
IndustrialproductionmanagerscoordinatetheresourcesandactivitiesrequiredtoproducemillionsofgoodseveryyearintheU
ItisagreedthatallnationsshouldtakemeasuresagainstterrorismonthebasisoftheUN______andotherinternationallaws.
随机试题
徐某购买了一辆重型自卸货车,将车挂靠在一汽车运输队,并办理了盗抢险保险业务。车辆的年检、保险等费用均由徐某个人支出。后徐某将该车出售给他人,次日即向公安机关及保险公司谎报假案,称车辆失窃,最终通过运输队获取盗窃险保险金6万余元。对于徐某的行为认定,下列选项
按中国新九分法,成人的双上肢全部烧伤时,烧伤面积占体表面积的
在城市化的离心发展阶段,城市化类型可分为()。
大城市应当把发展()放在优先地位。
社会工作者应当保持诚信,应当向服务对象和公众披露所有可以披露的信息,尤其是那些与服务对象利益密切相关的信息。但如果因为披露信息可能会给他人、社会公众或国家造成伤害和重大损失,则应遵守有关保密的法律和规章,并接受专家辅导。这是处理社会工作实践中的伦理难题的什
Notonlyhebutalsowe______right.Heaswellaswe______right.
教育是一种影响政治经济的舆论力量。()
在大学生就业难的背景下,很多大学毕业生的收入远不如一些低学历农民工,社会上“读书无用论”的声音持续升高。对此。你怎么看?
我国的国家结构形式属于()。
下列可作为VisualBasic变量名的是
最新回复
(
0
)