首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Which is safer--staying at home, traveling to work on public transport, or working in the office? Surprisingly, each of these ca
Which is safer--staying at home, traveling to work on public transport, or working in the office? Surprisingly, each of these ca
admin
2011-02-10
61
问题
Which is safer--staying at home, traveling to work on public transport, or working in the office? Surprisingly, each of these carries the same risk, which is very low: However, what about flying compared to working in the chemical industry? Unfortunately, the former is 65 times riskier than the latter! In fact, the accident rate of workers in the chemical industry is less than that of almost any of human activity, and almost as safe as staying at home.
The trouble with the chemical industry is that when things go wrong they often cause death to those living nearby. It is this which makes chemical accidents so newsworthy. Fortunately, they are extremely rare. The most famous ones happened at Texas City (1947), Flixborough (1974), Seveso (1976), Pemex (1984) and Bhopal (1984).
Some of these are always in the minds of the people even though the loss of life was small. No one died at Seveso, and only 28 workers at Flixborough. The worst accident of all was Bhopal, where up to 3,000 were killed. The Texas City explosion of fertilizer killed 552. The Pemex fire at a storage plant for natural gas in the suburbs of Mexico City took 542 lives, just a month before the unfortunate event at Bhopal.
Some experts have discussed these accidents and used each accident to illustrate a particular danger. Thus the Texas City explosion was caused by tons of ammonium nitrate, which is safe unless stored in great quantity. The Flixborough fireball was the fault of management, which took risks to keep production going during essential repairs. The Seveso accident shows what happens if the local authorities lack knowledge of the danger on their doorstep. When the poisonous gas drifted over the town, local leaders were incapable of taking effective action. The Pemex fire was made worse by an overloaded site in an overcrowded suburb. The fire set off a chain reaction of exploding storage tanks. Yet, by a miracle, the two largest tanks did not explode. Had these caught fire, then 3,000 strong rescue team and fire fighters would all have died.
Which of the following statements is true? ______
选项
A、Working at the office is safer than staying at home.
B、Travelling to work on public transport is safer than working at the office.
C、Staying at home is safer than working in the chemical industry.
D、Working in the chemical industry is safer than traveling by air.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3AcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Securitymenbelievethetit-for-tatmurdersweretheresultofthebombingwhichhadoccurredinthecitycenter.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Nextfall,whenyouseegeeseheadingsouthforthewinter,flyingalongin"V"formation,youmightconsiderwhatsciencehasd
Nextfall,whenyouseegeeseheadingsouthforthewinter,flyingalongin"V"formation,youmightconsiderwhatsciencehasd
Thisreflectstheprioritybeingattachedtoeconomicoverpoliticalactivity,partlycausedbyagrowingreluctancetoentera
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofatemporaryworkforce.TheUnitedStatesBureauofLa
Duringtheopera’smostfamousariathetempochosenbytheorchestra’sconductorseemed______,withoutnecessaryrelationtow
Itwouldbewiseifyouhadnotbreathedasinglewordofthematter.
Whentheybrokeopenthedoor,theyfoundastrangemanliedonthefloorunconscious.
InterpretthefollowingpassagesfromChineseintoEnglish.Startinterpretingatthesignalandstopatthesignal.Youmaytak
随机试题
A.水B.肌酐C.尿素D.蛋白质E.钾离子血液透析是利用弥散作用,使用半透膜两侧两种不同浓度及性质的溶液发生物质交换。不能通过半透膜的物质是
香薷散的功用是()新加香薷饮的功用是()
国产非标准设备原价有多种计算方法,但无论哪种方法,都应该使非标准设备计价()
新《商检法》规定,对列入《目录》的进出口商品,商检机构应当在( )内检验完毕。
下列不属于资产管理业务的是()。
如果财政支出受益范围局限于某一地区,那么财政支出应由()负责。
宪法规定各少数民族居住地方实行区域自治。()
有些人坚持认为,在刑事审判中应该允许起诉人使用非法获得的证据,只要法官和陪审团被说服而相信执行警员在获得证据时并没意识到违法或并不想有意违法。这种被建议的“善意的例外”将会削弱宪法对每个人的保护,导致警察行为的不谨慎,鼓励执法官员在法庭上说谎。上述
Atthefall2001SocialScienceHistoryAssociationconventioninChicago,theCrimeandJusticenetworksponsoredaforumon
WhendidEdwarddisplayhistalentasaspeaker?
最新回复
(
0
)