首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Does Genetic Research Threaten Our Civil Liberties? The Current Genetic Research The science of genetics is a flourishin
Does Genetic Research Threaten Our Civil Liberties? The Current Genetic Research The science of genetics is a flourishin
admin
2010-05-09
25
问题
Does Genetic Research Threaten Our Civil Liberties?
The Current Genetic Research
The science of genetics is a flourishing new industry, nourished in large part by the federally funded Human Genome Project. The goal of this ambitious research endeavor is to identify every gene found in the human body, perhaps 100,000 in all. Several months ago, the U.S. government and a private corporation announced that they had "completed" the "map" of the genome, although actually there are still many gaps. Much related research focuses on genetic diagnostics-- tests designed to identify genes thought to be associated with various medical conditions. More than 50 new genetic tests have been identified in the past five years alone.
The increasing speed, sophistication, affordability, and interconnectivity of computer systems allow the rapid monitoring and matching of many millions of records. A 1994 benchmark study by the ACLU found that "concerns about personal privacy run deep among the American people".
The promotion of an ideology of geneticization fosters the belief that genes are determinative of an individual’s behavior, character, and future. Capitalist economic relations have created a scramble (争夺) for venture capital, the altering of patent laws, and calls for mass genetic testing by researchers who trade on the old image of the altruistic scientist to mask their conflicts of interest in testing labs, patents, consulting contracts, etc.
The Technological Society
Technologies are not value-neutral; they usually embody the perspectives, purposes, and political objectives of powerful social groups. The dominant ideology in Western society proclaims that science and technology are value-neutral, and the only problems caused by technologies are either "externalities" (unintended side effects) or abuses. However, because technologies are the result of human interventions into the otherwise natural progression of activities (and not acts of God or of nature), they are themselves actually imbued with human intentions and purposes. Current technologies do not equally benefit all segments of society (and indeed are not intended to do so), although to maximize public support for these developments and to minimize potential opposition, their proponents rarely acknowledge these distributional ramifications (分歧).
The United States is a society in which the differential access to wealth and power has been exacerbated during recent years. Thus, those people with more power can determine the kinds of technological developments that are researched and implemented. Because of their size, scale, and requirements for capital investments and for knowledge, modem technologies are powerful interventions into the natural order. They tend to be the mechanisms by which already powerful groups extend, manifest, and further consolidate their powers. Thus, technologies themselves are not neutral; they are social and political phenomena. Genetic technologies and computerization exhibit these characteristics, and reflect power differentials in the society.
The results of technological advancement appear to offer a good future capabilities of enhanced surveillance (监视) and control over people and events, as well as promises of perfectionism (thus leading to both a loss of privacy and increased opportunities for discrimination by powerful entities). Predictability will replace a tolerance for natural variation and diversity.
Loss of Privacy
Genetic privacy, like medical privacy in general, involves notions of the dignity and integrity of the individual. Is data accurate? Can individuals access their own files? Can the donor correct inaccurate data? Are the custodians faithful and are technical security systems protecting the data where possible? Does the individual have control over which third parties are allowed access, and under what conditions?
•Infant blood tests are stored in database. The U.S. Department of Defense insists on taking DNA samples from all its personnel, ostensibly for identification of those killed in action and body parts from military accidents -- despite the fact that the samples are to be kept for 50 years (long after people have left active duty). The program includes civilian employees. The agency refuses to issue regulations barfing all third party use, and the Department will not accept waivers (弃权声明) from the next of kin (最近的亲属) of subjects not wanting to donate tissues.
•The FBI has been promoting the genetic screening of criminals to establish state DNA identification data banks to be used in criminal investigations; indeed, Federal legislation penalizes states fiscally if they don’t participate, and now all do. Yet the data includes samples from those whose crimes have low recidivism (累犯) rates or don’t leave tissue samples; in some states people merely accused are forced into the program, and in others there are politicians calling for an expansion along these lines, despite the Constitutional presumption of innocence.
•Infant blood samples, from the heel-sticks used to determine blood type and test for PKU, are stored as "Guthrie blots". California alone has more than seven million in its repository.
The American Civil Liberties Union advocates that "the decision to undergo genetic screening is purely personal" and it should not be "subject to control or compulsion by third parties" or the government. And "where a person has intentionally undergone genetic screening procedures there must be no disclosure of findings to third parties without the express and informed consent of the subject given after the results of the screening are made known to the subject and upon such times and conditions as the subject may require..." Yet patients’ records "are commodities for sale," in the words of the New York Times a few years ago, and a panel of the U.S. National Research Council has warned that the computerized medical records of millions of citizens are open to misuse and abuse.
Genetic Discrimination
Genetic discrimination is the other major civil liberty threatened by genetic research. Scientists working with the Council for Responsible Genetics have documented hundreds of cases where healthy people have been denied insurance or employment based on genetic "predictions." Of course, relatively few genetic diseases are deterministic; most tests (which have inherent limits themselves) cannot tell us if a genetic mutation will become manifest; if it does do so, it cannot tell us when in life this will occur; and if it happens, how severe the condition will be. In addition, many genetic conditions can be controlled or treated by interventions and environmental changes.
The growth of the mania (狂热) for testing in the U.S. is a manifestation of class relationships, through new technological possibilities: Employers test employees, insurance companies and health organizations test patients, college officials test students, legislators pass bills to test a variety of disempowered groups (welfare recipients, prisoners, immigrants and the like). Such indignities are never foisted upon the ruling class by the masses.
Federal rules for medical privacy (including genetic information) were announced in August 2000, after weaker proposals by the Clinton Administration received a great deal of criticism. While providing standards for the disclosure of bio-information, the rules require that the patient only receive notice, not give consent; thus, there still would not be full patient control over sensitive information.
The President has also announced his support of a Federal bill which would prohibit health insurance providers from using any type of genetic information for making decisions about whether to cover a person or what premium to charge. This legislation would address some of the discrimination problems which have been occurring. And he has issued an Executive Order barring genetic discrimination in Federal employment.
Conclusion
Beyond the risks of discrimination and loss of privacy, however, society’s fascination with genetic determinism has other social and political consequences. An overemphasis on the role of genes in human health neglects environmental and social factors, thus contributing to the image of people with "defective" genes as "damaged goods". This, in effect, encourages a "blame the victim" mindset, directly contrary to the public policy embodied in the Americans with Disabilities Act, now 10 years old. Economic and social resources end up being diverted into finding biomedical "solutions" while social measures get badly needed.
Although new technologies claim to offer us more "freedom", they really can threaten our civic values. This is certainly true of the new biology.
The U.S. Department of Defense bars third-party use of employees’ DNA samples.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
B
解析
细节题 根据关键词DNA samples和the U.S. Department of Defense查读小标题Loss of Privacy下面的第一个要点The U.S. Department of Defense insists on taking DNA samples from all its personnel...The agency refuses to issue regulations barring all third party use.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3SOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothepassage,themainreasonwhyyoungpeopleshouldbediscouragedfrombecomingactorsis______.Accordingtot
ToallAmericans,anotherbasic(36)______intheirconstitutionistheBillofRights,adoptedin1971.Thisconsistsof10ver
Contrarytothepopularconceptionthattypicalsciencefictionisaboutthemonsters,thisliteraryefforttalksabouttherel
Americanseat_______________(两倍多的蛋白质)theyactuallyneedeveryday.
A、Theyusuallyacceptresponsibility.B、Theyblamefactorsbeyondtheircontrol.C、Theycomplainabouttheirpersonalproblems.
Jazzbeganintheearly20thcenturyasakindofmusicofblackAmericans.Itwas(36)______forsinging,fordancing,andfor
Jazzbeganintheearly20thcenturyasakindofmusicofblackAmericans.Itwas(36)______forsinging,fordancing,andfor
Jazzbeganintheearly20thcenturyasakindofmusicofblackAmericans.Itwas(36)______forsinging,fordancing,andfor
Severalfactorsmaketheemergencyroomfrightful,andtheyalloriginatefromnotknowing.Inthecaseofdischarge,apatient
Severalfactorsmaketheemergencyroomfrightful,andtheyalloriginatefromnotknowing.Ifthedoctorsdecidetooperateon
随机试题
驾驶机动车在路口直行遇到这种情况怎么办?(图3.11.6)
抽取胸腔积液过程中出现胸膜反应,最恰当的治疗是
医院统计部门的职责有
A.性能功效相似药物配合应用,可以增强原有疗效的配伍B.性能功效有部分共性的药物配合应用C.一种药的毒副作用能被另一种药物减轻或消除的配伍D.一种药物能减轻或消除另一种药毒性的配伍E.一种药物能使另一种药物的功效降低或消失的配伍相恶的定义是
长于温中止血,又有止呕、止泻之功的药物是
工程量清单由总说明和清单计价表格组成。其中在清单计价表格中,()是指构成工程实体的项目,是工程量清单的主要内容。
2009年H省年末常住人口达到7034.4万人,出生人90.7万人,出生率为12.93‰;死亡人口45.1万人,死亡率为6.43‰;净增人口45.6万人。2009年城镇居民人均可支配收入达14718.3元。其中,工资性收入9830.6元,增长10.66
8/3.
以下叙述中错误的是( )。
以下关于return语句的叙述中正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)