首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is praise
The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is praise
admin
2014-01-07
83
问题
The idea of creating a system that allows the underprivileged the opportunity to break the cycle and achieve something is praiseworthy. So it never ceases to amaze me how something so noble can be so blatantly abused and the offenders are able to get away with it.
I live in a country—the only country, I might add—that was colonised through an act of diplomacy and not force. The citizens of the country became members of the British Empire by scratching ink on the paper of a poorly translated treaty that disadvantaged them from the beginning. All because of some greedy Brits wanted to trade land for glass beads, tobacco and blankets.(In some ways, this treaty protected the natives from some pretty nasty scams, but only so that the government could scam the tribes themselves). The third article of this treaty allowed the "natives"(although their claim to be native of the land in question is dubious in itself—they were merely there before the British)all the rights and benefits of a subject under the rule of Her Majesty Queen Victoria. The history lesson is nearly over—bear with me, it is relevant.
The rights and benefits of becoming a member of the British Empire included the banning of the native language to be taught in schools and used to communicate in public. The savages were to be tamed. For a country so progressive that gave women the vote 10 years before the rest of the world(if only to call a politician’s bluff), this was a barbaric act. But these acts of naturalisation, and reparation have since been carried out by the government for the last 50-75 years, allowing the natives extra rights and benefits as to soothe the indignity done to their ancestors. Now a considerable number of the "disenfranchised" live on a social welfare benefit from the government, and can afford cable TV, all the latest mod-cons and a fast track into the good life of higher education(all subsidised, of course)in the name, not of affirmative action — although it is—but of racial appeasement. Now I could talk about some of the blind privileges that come with this, but I will save that essay for another day. The topic I wish to address today are those who are born with silver spoons in their mouths that claim these benefits without batting an eyelid.
In order to claim a number of these benefits, one need only 1/16th of native blood in one’s family to be considered "native". So you have blond-haired blue-eyed "natives" that have no clue of their whakapapa, let alone can speak the language. These young opportunists come from upper class families. They went to the best private schools, and for birthdays, mummy and daddy dearest sent them around the world to see history and what real culture is. These bright young things have trust funds amounting to tens of thousands that they will get when they turn 21. They’re on a first name basis with all the hot shot company directors and politicians, and they still have the audacity to claim—and receive—the scholarships and benefits their less fortunate counterparts deserve.
This is where the "blind eye" of privilege amazes me. As Betacandy’s first post so beautifully sets out— privilege is something given or assumed so often that a set of actions and expectations are built up and become a normal attitude to associate with specific practices, races and gender. The selection process assures us that equal opportunities are afforded to each applicant(that assertion is worth another whole rant in itself). How can the close examination of each applicant—their achievements and background—allow such a gross abuse of privilege to take place? This is merely one country where it happens, and I could go on for ever on this subject.
The privileged are simply that—privileged. What gives them the right to take for themselves the opportunities offered to those who cannot afford to pay for the experience in the first place? Somebody, please, answer me this.
The author most probably thinks that the "blind privileges" granted to the natives now are
选项
A、praiseworthy.
B、unreasonable.
C、advantageous to racial appeasement.
D、insufficient to make up for their lost.
答案
B
解析
根据题干中的blind privileges定位到第3段最后两句。该段最后一句中的these benefits指的就是上一句提到的blind privileges,光从这一句中的born with silver spoons in their mouths就可以知道作者认为有些生于富贵之家的人也在享受本来用于帮助贫穷的印第安人(the natives)的优惠政策,再仔细看下面的段落,可以发现这三段的内容相同,都是有关blind privileges被滥用,由此可见,本题应选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/43FK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisCORRECTaboutSaturday’smatch?
Employersfailto______.
Whatistheexpectedannualgrowthrateofthesevenleadingindustrializedeconomiesinthesecondhalfoftheyear?
Thewomanwas______beforewhenexamswerecoming.
Somethingisgoingoninthestepmotheringcamp.Callitanuprising,orarebranding.TherewasthestoryaboutthewomaninAu
ArecenttalkbygamesacademicJaneMcGonigalhasre-igniteddiscussionontheroletheyplayinoursociety.Traditionally,th
TheUniversityofSouthernCaliforniahasthelargestnumberofinternationalstudentssince
Howparentsreacttodifficulties______astronginfluenceontheirkids.
CaliforniansandNewEnglandersspeakthesamelanguageand______bythesamefederallaws.
MervynKing,governoroftheBankofEngland,weighedintothedebateaboutimmigrationlastnightwhenhestronglyhintedthat
随机试题
微分方程xy″-y′=x的通解是____________.
关于不当得利的成立条件,下列说法错误的是()。
关于内脏神经的叙述,错误的是
患者男性,78岁,近10年来乏力,尿频。淋漓不畅,每晚5~6次,无尿痛、尿急。昨日大量饮酒后下腹部胀痛,逐渐加重。查体:耻骨联合上区可触及一圆形且有压痛的弹性肿物。临床最可能的诊断是()
学习的动机有哪些功能?
在演示文稿中新增一幻灯片可以采用的方式是()。
刑事强制权是为了保证刑事诉讼的顺利进行,由公安机关对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人行使的强制权力。下列属于刑事强制权的有()。
外国人在我国领域外对我国国家或者公民犯罪,适用我国刑法,必须是()。
毛泽东在《(共产党人)发刊词》中所说的“伟大的工程”是指()
HowTwoGreatConflictsHelpedtoChangeEuropeNinetyyearsagoonasunnymorninginNorthernFrance,somethinghappenedt
最新回复
(
0
)