首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2015-01-27
57
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What does RPO start with?
选项
A、Third party recruiters
B、Contract recruiting
C、Internal staffing Agency
D、In-house recruitment
答案
A
解析
文中第三段提到“Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionaryprocess that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or asan adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives.”即:招聘流程外包是一个演化过程的高峰,这个过程从第三方招聘发展起来,最初是为部门经理服务或是一个公司内部招聘主动权的附属机构。所以,A项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4g7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
1.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.StaffManagement:howtoachieveandmaintainhighm
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.MarketResearch:theimportanceofdoingmarketresearc
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Technology:theimportanceoftrainingstaffinhowto
1.Practiseansweringthesequestions.PhaseOne:•Canyoutellmeaboutyourpresentjobandyourplansforthefuture?•Can
Askingquestions征询
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Customerrelations:howtodefuseangrycustomersB:Recruitment:howtohireanewm
随机试题
根据我国法律规定,涉外不动产物权民事争议,应适用()
根据“三步走”发展战略,我国到21世纪中叶的战略目标是()
甲为了能在自己的房子里欣赏远处的风景。便与相邻的乙约定:乙不在自己的土地上从事高层建筑;作为补偿,甲每年支付给乙4000元。两年后,乙将该土地使用权转让给丙。丙在该土地上建了一座高楼,与甲发生了纠纷。对此纠纷,下列判断哪一个是正确的?
下列关于工程结构或其某一部分进入状态的描述中,哪个选项属于正常使用极限状态?()[2010年真题]
下列关于银行资产负债利率风险的说法中,不正确的是()
各种不同的账务处理程序的主要相同点有()。
人的心理现象()
人格是一个人区别于他人的稳定而统一的心理品质,影响人格发展的因素众多,在中学阶段影响学生人格的主要因素是()
挪用公款罪的主体是()。
关于切实做好我市所有柴油公交车冒黑烟问题治理工作的通告市运管处、维修办、各公交企业:为加强公交车尾气排放污染的整治力度,杜绝柴油公交车严重冒黑烟现象,经5月16日局长专题会议研究决定,从6月1日开始对我市所有柴油公交车冒黑烟问题进行集中
最新回复
(
0
)