首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
38
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
What is the short-term thinking of the corporate mergers and acquisitions prevalent today? What are the possible drawbacks of such thinking?
选项
答案
to pay less tax(tax avoidance)/ promote share prices in the short term / help the financial executives to gain more in fees / more concerned with "positive net present value" / such thinking would weaken+destroy(sap)long-term growth plans /("add complexity and risk")("hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation")/ does harm to companies("harm the companies")/ only to meet the targets of financial markets + to guarantee the "smooth" earnings for financial sectors
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5cSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thedaythissmalltowntolditsresidentstostopdrinkingthewater,lifeonGlendaleBoulevardturnedfromquiettoalarm
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
HIV/AIDSisnowrecognizedclearlyasagrowingthreattoChina.AccordingtoofficialChineseestimates,Chinanowhasapproxim
下面你将听到联合国秘书长接受有关奖项的一段讲话。Mr.Chairman,Excellencies,LadiesandGentlemen,Ishouldlike,firstofall,toonceagainthank
SincetheestablishmentofdiplomatictiesbetweenChinaandtheUnitedStates,contactsbetweenthetwopeopleshavebeenonco
Nowpeoplebelievethatboththeirgovernmentsandindividualsshouldpracticejustice,integrityandtrust.
A、ThedeathofJapanesefishermancausedtensionbetweenJapanandRussia.B、Thedisputeoverthechainislandsinitiatedthein
Intheinformationtechnologyindustry,itiswidelyacknowledgedthathowwellITdepartmentsofthefuturecanfulfilltheirb
随机试题
计算简答题:根据所给材料回答问题。(需计算后回答的问题,须列出算式;每个问题计算过程中的小数均保留实际位数,计算结果有小数的,小数保留2位。)张老师的一篇文章在《朝华教育》杂志上发表。李老师读后有不同意见,就以笔名“郑见”写了一篇文章,投给《春天
我国的对外开放包括()
A.溶解吸收B.包裹C.钙化D.机化结核球的形成是干酪样物质被
社会主义市场经济体制下,计划的功能有()。
行政复议决定书一经送达,即发生法律效力。( )
在《中华人民共和国物权法》尚未出台的情况下,《物业管理条例》吸收了发达国家成熟的()理论,明确了业主作为建筑物区分所有权人的权利义务。
个体由于过去的经验而对面临的人或事可能会具有某种说不出理由而较执著地肯定或否定的内心倾向,叫()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力与对表达能力并重的考试。2.作答参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、资料1.200
书最早是以昂贵的手稿复制品出售的,印刷机问世后,就便宜多了。在印刷机问世的最初几年里,市场上对书的需求量成倍增长。这说明,印刷品书籍的出现刺激了人们的阅读兴趣.大大增加了购书者的数量。以下哪项如果为真,最能质疑上述论证?
ADO对象模型中,RecordSet对象的AddNew方法的功能是______。
最新回复
(
0
)