首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、optimistic about B、pessimistic about C、not enthusiastic about D、devoted to C
A、optimistic about B、pessimistic about C、not enthusiastic about D、devoted to C
admin
2013-10-08
46
问题
Interview with Peter Moore, the Chief-Engineer of OPEL
Interviewer: The cars you are making today will come to the market in the year 2000. ’Will there be any fundamental changes?
Mr. Moore: No, the time is too short for such kind of changes. It takes 5 years at a minimum to develop a completely new car. For engines it takes even a longer time. The engine for one model usually serves for 15 or even 20 years, and there are only slight changes during this period. There is also a certain insistence on a big automaker’s mind that it should keep its characteristic style which makes its cars different. That is to say in spite of the changes an Opel still has to look like an Opel at least within several years’ time. That’s why there won’t be any revolutionary changes in the next few years. I would say it will only be a step by step evolution.
Interviewer: What are your major considerations in the development of a new car?
Mr. Moore: The first and most important thing is to lower the consumption of petrol. So that we will not only have an economical ear, but also an environmentally friendly one. The active and passive safetiesfor the passengers are also very important. Last but not least, a car should be comfortable and provide all facilities for an enjoyable ride. I think building a car for the future with these considerations Will lead us to success.
Interviewer: Yes, at the moment it seems to become increasingly important to make a car enjoyable. The cars are becoming faster and faster.
Mr. Moore: That’s right. Today a 100 HP-engine is more powerful than a 100 HP-engine 10 years ago. In this area, automakers really have achieved a great deal in increasing the efficiency of the engine.
Interviewer: But do we actually need faster cars? Our cities are almost totally blocked up with traffic; our highways are so crowded that at any time of the day it is impossible to drive fast. The average speed in the city during rush hours is only about 20 km an hour. Everyone on a bicycle could be faster than that.
Mr. Moore: But that is only the case during rush hours. On the highways, I think there are enough opportunities for you to drive fast. People do need to drive fast in certain occasions. Besides, driving fast is a lot of fun. The increased efficiency also brings about a positive effect. Today all our cars use considerably less petrol than only a few years ago. The average consumption of petrol for all Opel models ranges about 7. 45 liters per 100 kilometers. It was even hard to imagine 10 years ago.
Interviewer: How are the chances for alternative fuels like hydrogen and electricity?
Mr. Moore: From the technical point of view alternatives like methanol or alcohol are no problem. But they are still too expensive and for this reason have no big chances. Regarding the hydrogen there still exist technical problems. The amount of hydrogen that can be carried on a car as its fuel is simply still too limited. As to the electro-car we should not forget that the electrical power has to be generated first. Here are the existing problems with the power-stations. Another problem is the weight. For carrying as much energy as what is contained in a 70-11ter petrol-tank, we would need a battery weighing 2.5 tons. I’m sure the electro-car will continue to develop we already have experimental electro-cars in use—but it’s impossible for them to play the main role in transport within the next few years.
Interviewer: What about solar energy? What do you think of the so-called "solar-car"?
Mr. Moore: There is still a great deal of research to be done on the use of solar energy. Recently we conducted some tests in Australia where we covered a distance of 3,500 kilometers. But the average speed of the test car only reached 65 kilometers per hour. A petrol engine with the same capacity would have wasted only 0.8 liters of petrol per 100 kilometers—and this is done without any expensive petrol-saving accessory. That shows the strength of the petrol-engine. Interviewer: In that case, is it still worthwhile then to carry out experiments on alternative energies?
Mr. Moore: They are a challenge for the fancies of our engineers and a contribution towards the development of new ideas. From this point of view they are very useful. But before long the petrol engine will show its strength. That is the reason why we cannot reckon on any cars with an alternative energy for the next century.
选项
A、optimistic about
B、pessimistic about
C、not enthusiastic about
D、devoted to
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6BZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
SimilaritiesandDifferencesbetweenPublicSpeakingandConversationI.BothPublicSpeakingandConversationneedyouto1.or
A"scientistic"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
Women’smindsworkdifferentlyfrommen.Atleast,thatiswhat(1)______mostmenareconvincedof.Psychologistsviewthesubj
Completethegap-fillingtask.SomeofthegapsbelowmayrequireamaximumofTHREEwords.Makesuretheword(s)youfillinis
ThefirstimmigrantsinAmericanhistorycamefrom______.
______isconsideredasthefounderofAmericandrama.
______isafigureofspeechinwhichsuchwordaslikeorasisomitted.
CultureShockI.CultureshockPeoplehavedifficultyin(1)_____toanewculturecompletelydifferentfromtheirown.Theshock
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
TheClassicalSenseofGoodGovernmentPoliticsplaysanextremelyimportantroleinhumansociety.Politicalphilosopherss
随机试题
A.脂质体B.免疫微球C.固体分散体D.微囊E.控释制剂在规定介质中,可以按要求缓慢恒速释放药物的是
简述社会学的功能。
A.肾精亏耗,精不上荣B.肾气不足C.肝胆湿热D.麻疹先兆E.肝火上炎耳轮干枯焦黑,多为()。
某钢筋混凝土框架结构,一类环境,抗震等级为二级,混凝土采用C30;中间层中间节点尺寸配筋如题图所示。试问,下列( )项梁面纵筋的配筋符合有关规范、规程的要求。
《防震减灾法》规定,防震减灾工作实行()的方针。
气割的优点有()。
生产力对教育的发展具有制约作用,生产力水平低意味着教育发展水平低。()
测得两批电子器材的部分电阻值为:A批:140,138,143,142,144,139;B批:135,140,142,136,135,140.设两批电子器材的电阻均服从正态分布,试在α=0.05下检验这两批电子器材的平均电阻有无显著差异
自实施“每周少开一天车”措施【131】,本市交通拥堵指数从“中度”下降【132】“轻度”,工作日全天拥堵时间也由限行前的7小时45分钟【133】到2小时30分钟。根据民意调查显示,约85%的市民支持“每周少开一天车”措施,其中有80%以上的有车人士和93%
AgainstabackgroundofgiantcolumnswithimagesofpyramidshungdozensofChineseredlanterns.ChineseandEgyptianperf
最新回复
(
0
)