首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2013-11-29
92
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990.What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures—5.2 million now, 5.5 million then—are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and. moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups—"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background" — and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6yZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thestudyoftherelationshipbetweenbrainandlanguageiscalled
Onedesignfeatureoflanguageis______whichmeanstheformsoflinguisticsignsbearnonaturalrelationshiptotheirmeaning.
Theword_____isusuallyNOTusedbyBritishpeople.
Anystudentsettingoutonacademiccareerinscienceislikelytobecomeincreasinglyseparatedfromhumanitiesandsociety.Ev
Anystudentsettingoutonacademiccareerinscienceislikelytobecomeincreasinglyseparatedfromhumanitiesandsociety.Ev
Itiscommonforstudentsinhighschooltowonderifcollegeeducationisreallyimportant.Manyhighschoolstudentsdon’ten
ThefirstrealorganizedefforttounitingEuropecame(1)______withthecreationoftheCouncilofEurope,wasestablished(2)
LiteratureofNeoclassicismisdifferentfromthatofRomanticisminthat
J.D.Salinger’snovel______isregardedasastudents’classic.
Pen-palLetters:TheCross-curricularExperienceIaskedmycousin,ateacherinTucson,Arizona,tohaveourclassesbecome
随机试题
小儿鹅口疮的病原体是
A.法半夏、厚朴B.沙参、百合C.甘草、桔梗D.党参、白术E.干姜、细辛久嗽热伤肺津,口干咽燥,舌红者。可在主方中加用
A.去心B.去毛C.去皮壳D.去枝梗E.去残根金樱子在炮制过程中应()
某单位推销员拿盖有单位公章的空白合同文本,与其他单位签订了超越授权范围的合同,此时订立的合同( )。
富兰公司是一家工业生产企业,为增值税一般纳税人,增值税税率17%,存货采用实际成本法计价。2014年7月发生如下经济业务事项:(1)7月1日,采购甲材料,价款为2000元,增值税为340元,未发生其他费用,款项上月已经支付,材料已验收入库。
( )是对经济活动和经济交往中书立、使用、领受具有法律效力的凭证的单位和个人征收的一种税。
中国银行规定以凭证式国债质押的贷款最高额不得超过质押权利凭证面额的()。
人们对理财的需求只体现在对财务缺口的弥补上。()
国内某作家的一篇小说先在某晚报上连载3个月,每月取得稿酬3600元,然后送交出版社出版,一次取得稿酬20000元。该作家因此需缴纳个人所得税()元。
TheU.S.systemofhighereducationiswidelyconsideredtheworld’sbest.Acollegeeducation【C1】________substantialbenefits—a
最新回复
(
0
)