首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
admin
2011-03-14
18
问题
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymakers improve on the market outcome? There are no simple answers to these questions.
One source of inefficiency is the markup (涨价) of price over marginal cost. Because of the markup, some consumers who value the good at more than the marginal cost of production (but less than the price) will be deterred (被阻止) from buying it. Thus, a monopolistically competitive market has the normal deadweight loss of monopoly .pricing.
Although tins outcome is clearly undesirable compared to the first-best outcome of price equal to marginal cost, there is no easy way for policymakers to-fix the problem. To enforce marginal-cost pricing, policymakers would need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products. Because such products are so common in the economy, the administrative burden of such regulation would be overwhelming. Moreover, the regulating monopolistic competitors would entail all the problems of regulating natural monopolies. In particular, because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits already, requiring them to lower their prices to equal marginal cost would cause them to make losses. To keep these firms in business, the government would need to help them cover these losses. Rather than raising taxes to pay for these subsidies, policymakers may decide it is better to live with tile inefficiency of monopolistic pricing
Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the "ideal" one. That is, there may be too much or too little entry. One way to think about this problem is in terms of the externalities associated with entry. Whenever a new firm considers entering the market with a new product, it considers only the profit it would make. Yet its entry would also have two external effects: a) The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, there is a positive externality associated with entry b) The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, there is a negative externality associated with entry. Thus in a monopolistically competitive market, there are both positive and negative externalities associated with the entry of new firms. Depending on which externality is larger, a monopolistically competitive market could have either too few or too many products. Both of these externalities are closely related to the conditions for monopolistic competition. The former arises because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms. The latter arises because firms post a price above marginal cost and, therefore, are always eager to sell additional units. Conversely, because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods and charge a price equal to marginal cost, neither of these externalities exists under perfect competition.
In the end, we can conclude only that monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. That is, the invisible hand does not ensure that total surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition. Yet because the inefficiencies are subtle, hard to measure, and hard to fix, there is no easy way for public policy to improve the market outcome.
Who will be prevented from buying the good?
选项
A、Some consumers who also estimate the value of the good at more than the marginal cost of production.
B、Some consumers who estimate the price of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
C、Some consumers who have a high opinion of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
D、Some consumers who estimate the worth of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
答案
B
解析
文中讲了是因为过高的标价markup阻止了顾客购买,而不是货物的实际价值。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Ssa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
假设有两个寡头垄断厂商的行为遵循古诺模型,它们的成本函数分别为:这两个厂商生产一同质产品,其市场需求函数为:Q=4000+10p。根据古诺模型,试求:(1)厂商1和厂商2的反应函数;(2)均衡价格和厂商1与厂商2的均衡产量;(3)厂商
某垄断厂商的需求曲线为P=100-2q,其成本函数为TC=50+40q,则该垄断厂商实现利润最大化的产量是()
一位垄断厂商所面临的需求函数为Q=100-0.5P,边际成本为MC=40,如果垄断厂商实施完全价格歧视,那么利润最大时的边际收益是()
某垄断者的短期成本函数STC=0.1Q3-6Q2+120Q+3000,其中Q为每月的产量。为实现利润最大化,该厂商月生产40吨,获得利润为1000元。求:(1)满足以上条件的边际收益、总收益以及销售价格;(2)计算需求曲线在均衡点的需求价格
TheinteractionsbetweenChinaandtheUSwillsurelyhaveasignificant______onpeaceandstabilityintheAsia-Pacificregi
Oneofthesaddestthingsabouttheperiodinwhichweliveisthegrowingestrangement(疏远)betweenAmericaandEurope.Thismay
Alife-stylethatapparentlyexistsinallsocietiesismarriage--asociallysanctionedunionbetweenawomanandamanwithexp
Itremainstobeseenwhetherthereservesofrawmaterialsintheyear2000willbesufficienttosupplyaworldeconomywhich
随机试题
甲公司2009年年末所有者权益合计数为4735万元。2010年实现净利润1560万元,2010年3月分配上年股利630万元;2010年8月发现2008年、2009年行政部门使用的固定资产分别少提折旧200万元和300万元(达到重要性要求),假设按税法规定上
关于精浆的生理作用,下列叙述正确的是
A.直接暴力B.间接暴力C.肌肉牵拉D.疲劳性骨折E.病理性骨折高空坠落臀部着地引起脊柱骨折的原因为
大陆甲公司与台湾地区乙公司签订了出口家具合同,双方在合同履行中产生纠纷,乙公司拒绝向甲公司付款。甲公司在大陆将争议诉诸法院。关于向台湾当事人送达文书,下列哪些选项是正确的?(2009年卷一82题)
甲企业持有乙企业93%的股权,共计3000万股。2016年8月丙企业决定收购甲企业所持有的乙企业全部股权,该股权每股计税基础为10元、收购日每股公允价值为12元。在收购中丙企业以公允价值为32400万元的股权以及3600万元银行存款作为支付对价。假定
进口的应税消费品,实行从价定率办法计算应纳税额的,按照组成计税价格计算纳税,其公式为()。
依照宪法规定,下列职务中连续任职受“不得超过两届”规定的限制的是()。
在Internet服务中,标准端口号是指(25)。
Anewstudyusesadvancedbrain-scanningtechnologytocastlightontoatopicthat【M1
ProfessorWhitehadus______compositionseveryFriday.
最新回复
(
0
)