首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymak
admin
2011-03-14
30
问题
Is the outcome in a monopolistically (垄断地) competitive market desirable from the standpoint of society as a whole? Can policymakers improve on the market outcome? There are no simple answers to these questions.
One source of inefficiency is the markup (涨价) of price over marginal cost. Because of the markup, some consumers who value the good at more than the marginal cost of production (but less than the price) will be deterred (被阻止) from buying it. Thus, a monopolistically competitive market has the normal deadweight loss of monopoly .pricing.
Although tins outcome is clearly undesirable compared to the first-best outcome of price equal to marginal cost, there is no easy way for policymakers to-fix the problem. To enforce marginal-cost pricing, policymakers would need to regulate all firms that produce differentiated products. Because such products are so common in the economy, the administrative burden of such regulation would be overwhelming. Moreover, the regulating monopolistic competitors would entail all the problems of regulating natural monopolies. In particular, because monopolistic competitors are making zero profits already, requiring them to lower their prices to equal marginal cost would cause them to make losses. To keep these firms in business, the government would need to help them cover these losses. Rather than raising taxes to pay for these subsidies, policymakers may decide it is better to live with tile inefficiency of monopolistic pricing
Another way in which monopolistic competition may be socially inefficient is that the number of firms in the market may not be the "ideal" one. That is, there may be too much or too little entry. One way to think about this problem is in terms of the externalities associated with entry. Whenever a new firm considers entering the market with a new product, it considers only the profit it would make. Yet its entry would also have two external effects: a) The product-variety externality: Because consumers get some consumer surplus from the introduction of a new product, there is a positive externality associated with entry b) The business-stealing externality: Because other firms lose customers and profits from the entry of a new competitor, there is a negative externality associated with entry. Thus in a monopolistically competitive market, there are both positive and negative externalities associated with the entry of new firms. Depending on which externality is larger, a monopolistically competitive market could have either too few or too many products. Both of these externalities are closely related to the conditions for monopolistic competition. The former arises because a new firm would offer a product different from those of the existing firms. The latter arises because firms post a price above marginal cost and, therefore, are always eager to sell additional units. Conversely, because perfectly competitive firms produce identical goods and charge a price equal to marginal cost, neither of these externalities exists under perfect competition.
In the end, we can conclude only that monopolistically competitive markets do not have all the desirable welfare properties of perfectly competitive markets. That is, the invisible hand does not ensure that total surplus is maximized under monopolistic competition. Yet because the inefficiencies are subtle, hard to measure, and hard to fix, there is no easy way for public policy to improve the market outcome.
Who will be prevented from buying the good?
选项
A、Some consumers who also estimate the value of the good at more than the marginal cost of production.
B、Some consumers who estimate the price of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
C、Some consumers who have a high opinion of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
D、Some consumers who estimate the worth of the good at more than the marginal cost of the production.
答案
B
解析
文中讲了是因为过高的标价markup阻止了顾客购买,而不是货物的实际价值。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Ssa777K
本试题收录于:
MBA联考(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
MBA联考(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
某垄断厂商面临两个完全分割的市场,假设为市场1和市场2,每个市场的需求函数分别为x1=10-p1,x2=5-p2。厂商的边际成本固定为4。(1)求价格歧视下两个市场的产量与价格。(2)求无价格歧视下两个市场的产量与价格。
某垄断厂商的需求曲线为P=100-2q,其成本函数为TC=50+40q,则该垄断厂商实现利润最大化的产量是()
一位垄断厂商所面临的需求函数为Q=100-0.5P,边际成本为MC=40,如果垄断厂商实施完全价格歧视,那么利润最大时的边际收益是()
某垄断者的短期成本函数为STC=0.1Q3-6Q2+140Q+3000,成本用美元计算,Q为每月产量,为使利润最大,该垄断厂商每月生产40吨,赚取利润1000美元。请计算:(1)满足上述条件的边际收益,销售价格和总收益。(2)计算需求曲线在
寡头垄断和垄断的主要相同之处是()
Directions:Inthissection,youareaskedtowriteanessaybasedonthefollowingtable.Describethetableandstateyouropin
Oneofthesaddestthingsabouttheperiodinwhichweliveisthegrowingestrangement(疏远)betweenAmericaandEurope.Thismay
Thehopes,goals,fearsanddesires______widelybetweenmenandwomen,betweentherichandthepoor.
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
随机试题
对某种溃疡最常用的一种疗法可在六个月内把44%的患者的溃疡完全治愈。治疗这种溃疡的一种新疗法在六个月的试验中,有80%的溃疡患者有明显的好转,61%的溃疡患者痊愈。由于在试验中治疗的溃疡比平均的病情更严重,因此,这种新的疗法显然在疗效方面比最常用的疗法更显
一传入神经纤维进入中枢后,一方面通过突触联系兴奋某一中枢神经元,另一方面通过侧支兴奋一抑制性中间神经元,从而抑制另一中枢神经元,这种抑制称为
下列SPECT分辨率测试步骤(铅栅型)错误的一项
有关食管的叙述,错误的是
文花枝是旅游从业人员的优秀代表,是我们学习的榜样。在2005年“8.28”重大交通事故中,全国模范导游员文花枝永远失去了左腿,让人们认识了优秀的导游员文花枝。又如,在某省神仙谷风景区,女导游同事失足跌进洪水汹涌的山涧,两位男同事舍身相救,结果都被湍急的水流
邓某因为违反交通规则,交警将其车辆扣押达半年之久,迟迟不予归还,车辆也被损坏。邓某如果请求国家赔偿,下面哪个不是国家承担赔偿责任的方式?()
蝉发出“知——了,知——了”的呜叫声的器官是:
(2011年真题)甲因自己不能生育,花1万元从人贩子手中收买一男婴。3个月后,甲嫌抚养孩子太辛苦,遂以2万元转卖给乙,并声称是自己的亲生儿子。甲的行为构成()。
在一次考试中,试卷上画了五大洲的图形,每个图形都编了号,要求填出其中任意2个洲名,分别有5名学生填了如下编号。甲:3是欧洲,2是美洲;乙:4是亚洲,2是大洋洲;丙:1是亚洲,5是非洲;丁:4是非洲,3是大洋洲;
A、youmaytakehimasyourlifelongtrustworthyfriendB、itseemsnecessaryforyoutolethimknowitC、it’sproperforyouto
最新回复
(
0
)