首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
59
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
What is the main idea of the passage?
选项
A、Scribbler50’s attitude toward smoking bans.
B、The research on people’s stopping smoking.
C、The effectiveness of smoking bans.
D、Smoking bans in restaurants and bars.
答案
C
解析
本文先讲禁烟令的实施过程中人们的态度,由此引出对禁烟效果的讨论,还探讨了不同提示语的禁烟效果,最后展望未来禁烟的一些可能性,可以看出,禁烟效果是贯穿全文的主题,故C正确。A“Scribbler50对禁烟的态度”、B“关于人们停止吸烟的研究”和D“餐厅和酒吧的禁烟令”均是文章的细节,不足以概括全文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7TuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
TheCosmologicalPrincipleP1:Cosmologistshypothesizedthatthedistributionofmatterintheuniverseishomogeneousandisot
Lookatthefoursquares,A,B,C,andD,whichindicatewherethefollowingsentencecouldbeaddedtothepassagebelow.Where
_____AbrahamLincolnwasthegreatestAmericanpresidentwastheunanimousvoteofagroupofprominenthistorians.
Thedramaticexpansionoftherailroadnetworkinthe1850s,however,strainedthefinancingcapacityoflocalgovernmentsandr
Whydoesthestudentgotoseethedirector?Choose2answers.Accordingtothedirector,whatisthepolicyconcerningmealpl
MEXICANMURALART(1)ThefirstmajormodernartmovementinLatinAmericawasMexicanmuralism,whichfeaturedlarge-scale
DeltaThelargeriverbestknowntotheancientGreekswastheNileofEgypt.Theyspokeoftheriverwithadmirationandcal
Thegrassblades,brushingwiththemovementsoftheirgrowth,madejoyousgentlesounds,likethesighsofamaideninlove.
AirPollutionandtheImportanceofTreesAirpollutionisnotapopularsubject,whichiswhylittlenoticehasbeentaken
Theoldmansatbeforethefireinatrance,thinkingofhispastlife.
随机试题
Iftherewerenoexaminations,weshouldhave______atschool.
膀胱结核行膀胱扩大术前至少应接受几周的抗结核药物治疗
治疗胃癌气血亏虚型,应首选
A.2~3dB.3~7dC.7~10dD.10~14dE.2~3周生理性黄疸消退的时间()。
不计数额,下列哪一选项构成侵占罪?
某啤酒生产线设备安装工程项目,施工项目部在各工程正式施工开始前,对各项准备工作及影响质量的各因素和有关方面进行了质量控制。施工项目经理部为了确保工程项目质量符合设计意图和国家规范、标准的要求,采用PD—CA循环方法对该工程进行质量控制。
建设工程项目总进度目标论证的工作包括:(1)项目结构分析;(2)编制各层进度计划;(3)进度计划系统的结构分析;(4)项目的工作编码。其正确的工作顺序是()。[2013年真题]
生产经营单位对从业人员进行安全生产教育和培训的内容包括()。
被称为“国际会议之都”的城市是()。
多路复用(Multiplexing,也称多路复接)是通信中常用的技术,在不同的应用场合中可以采用不同的多路复用方式,如:(23):6芯光缆就是采用这种方式;(24):GSM通信中采用此方式;(25):用此方式60路话音可复用一个超群(Supergro
最新回复
(
0
)