首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-01-13
92
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Vmi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
影响膀胱肿瘤患者预后的重要因素是
前列腺增生和神经性膀胱功能障碍的鉴别有赖于
(Thefirst)electriclamphadtwocarbonrods(fromwhich)vapor(served)toconductthecurrent(across)thegap.
Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsunderthetitleof"MyOpinionAboutBl
Nuclearenergyisanefficientandconvenientsubstituteforconventionalformsofenergywhichwerefoundinspecialgeographic
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷淡)andstagnation(呆滞).
A:CanIborrowyourgeographynotesfromProfessorJohnson’sclass?.B:______
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutMyApproachtoPerson
Shecouldnotrestrainhercuriositytoseewhatwasintheboxbeforeherguestshadleft.
Handwritinganalysis(graphology)circumventsthelawbyfryingtodetermineanemployee’straits(e.g.,stability)accordin
随机试题
morphs
Thedeclineinmoralstandards—whichhaslongconcernedsocialanalysts—hasatlastcapturedtheattentionofaverageAmericans.
A、胆汁分流B、自身免疫反应C、吸烟D、消炎药物E、幽门螺杆菌感染B型胃炎主要因()
下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉时发生面瘫的原是腭前神经阻滞麻醉时出现恶心或呕吐,可能是由于
提高深层淤泥质土的承载力要采取()。
损失补偿原则适用于财产损失保险、责任保险、信用保险和健康保险。
担保人因无效担保合同向债权人承担赔偿责任后,该担保人的权利有()。
2个以上法院都有管辖权的诉讼,原告可以向其中一个法院起诉;原告向2个以上有管辖权的法院起诉的,由最先立案的法院管辖。()
Allgreatwritersexpresstheirideasinanindividualway:itisoftenpossibletodeterminetheauthorshipofaliterarypassa
Asbothareligionandasocialforce,PuritanismhasmadeawidespreadinfluenceinthelinkedStates.
最新回复
(
0
)