首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World? If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World? If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about
admin
2013-09-26
31
问题
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World?
If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about genetically modified foods. For many people, the concept of genetically altered, high-tech crop production raises all kinds of environmental, health, safety and ethical questions. Particularly in countries with long agrarian traditions—and vocal green lobbies—the idea seems against nature.
In fact, genetically modified foods are already very much a part of our lives. A third of the corn and more than half the soybeans and cotton grown in the U. S. last year were the product of biotechnology, according to the Department of Agriculture. More than 65 million acres of genetically modified crops will be planted in the U. S. this year. The genetic is out of the bottle.
Yet there are clearly some very real issues that need to be resolved. Like any new product entering the food chain, genetically modified foods must be subjected to rigorous testing. In wealthy countries, the debate about biotech is tempered by the fact that we have a rich array of foods to choose from—and a supply that far exceeds our needs. In developing countries desperate to feed fast-growing and underfed populations; the issue is simpler and much more urgent: Do the benefits of biotech outweigh the risks?
The statistics on population growth and hunger are disturbing. Last year the world’s population reached 6 billion. And by 2050, the UN estimates, it will be probably near 9 billion. Almost all that growth will occur in developing countries. At the same time, the world’s available cultivable land per person is declining. Arable land has declined steadily since 1960 and will decrease by half over the next 50 years, according to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA).
How can biotech help?
Biotechnologists have developed genetically modified rice that is fortified with beta-carotene(β-胡萝卜素)—which the body converts into vitamin A—and additional iron, and they are working on other kinds of nutritionally improved crops. Biotech can also improve farming productivity in places where food shortages are caused by crop damage attribution to pests, drought, poor soil and crop viruses, bacteria or fungi(真菌).
Damage caused by pests is incredible. The European corn borer, for example, destroys 40 million tons of the world’s corn crops annually, about 7% of the total. Incorporating pest-resistant genes into seeds can help restore the balance. In trials of pest-resistant cotton in Africa, yields have increased significantly. So far, fears that genetically modified, pest-resistant crops might kill good insects as well as bad appear unfounded.
Viruses often cause massive failure in staple crops in developing countries. Two years ago, Africa lost more than half its cassava(树薯)crop—a key source of calories—to the mosaic virus. Genetically modified, virus-resistant crops can reduce that damage, as can drought-tolerant seeds in regions where water shortages limit the amount of land under cultivation. Biotech can also help solve the problem of soil that contains excess aluminum, which can damage roots and cause many staple-crop failures. A gene that helps neutralize aluminum toxicity(毒性)in rice has been identified.
Many scientists believe biotech could raise overall crop productivity in developing countries as much as 25% and help prevent the loss of those crops after they are harvested.
Yet for all that promise, biotech is far from being the whole answer. In developing countries, lost crops are only one cause of hunger. Poverty plays the largest role. Today more than 1 billion people around the globe live on less than 1 dollar a day. Making genetically modified crops available will not reduce hunger if farmers cannot afford to grow them or if the local population cannot afford to buy the food those farmers produce.
Biotech has its own "distribution" problems. Private-sector biotech companies in the rich countries carry out much of the leading-edge research on genetically modified crops. Their products are often too costly for poor farmers in the developing world, and many of those products won’t even reach the regions where they are most needed. Biotech firms have a strong financial incentive to target rich markets first in order to help them rapidly recoup the high costs of product development. But some of these companies are responding to needs of poor countries.
More and more biotech research is being carried out in developing countries. But to increase the impact of genetic research on the food production of those countries, there is a need for better collaboration between government agencies—both local and in developed countries—and private biotech firms. The ISAAA, for example, is successfully partnering with the U. S. Agency for International Development, local researches and private biotech companies to find and deliver biotech solutions for farmers in developing countries.
Will "Franken-foods" feed the world?
Biotech is not a panacea(治百病的药), but it does promise to transform agriculture in many developing countries. If that promise is not fulfilled, the real losers will be their people, who could suffer for years to come.
The world seems increasingly to have been divided into those who favor genetically modified foods and those who fear them. Advocates assert that growing genetically altered crops can be kinder to the environment and that eating foods from those plants is perfectly safe. And, they say, genetic engineering—which can induce plants to grow in poor soils or to produce more nutritious foods—will soon become an essential tool for helping to feed the world’s burgeoning(迅速发展的)population. Skeptics contend that genetically modified crops could pose unique risks to the environment and to health—risks too troubling to accept placidly. Taking that view, many European countries are restricting the planting and importation of genetically modified agricultural products. Much of the debate hinges on perceptions of safety. But what exactly does recent scientific research say about the hazards?
Two years ago in Edinburgh, Scotland, eco-vandals stormed a field, crushing canola plants. Last year in Maine, midnight raiders hacked down more than 3,000 experimental poplar trees. And in San Diego, protesters smashed sorghum and sprayed paint over greenhouse walls.
This far-flung outrage took aim at genetically modified crops. But the protests backfired; all the destroyed plants were conventionally bred. In each case, activists mistook ordinary plants for genetically modified varieties.
It’s easy to understand why. In a way, genetically modified crops—now on some 109 million acres of farmland worldwide—are invisible. You can’t see, taste or touch a gene inserted into a plant or sense its effects on the environment. You can’t tell, just by looking, whether pollen containing a foreign gene can poison butterflies or fertilize plants miles away. That invisibility is precisely what worries people. How, exactly, will genetically modified crops affect the environment—and when will we notice?
Advocates of genetically modified or transgenic crops say the plants will benefit the environment by requiring fewer toxic pesticides than conventional crops. But critics fear the potential risks and wonder how big the benefits really are. "We have so many questions about these plants," remarks Guenther Stotzky, a soil microbiologist at New York University. "There’s a lot we don’t know and need to find out. "
As genetically modified crops multiply in the landscape, unprecedented numbers of researchers have started fanning into the fields to get the missing information. Some of their recent findings are reassuring; others suggest a need for vigilance.
Genetically modified crops can help to improve______.
选项
A、nutrient contents and farming productivity
B、beta-carotene contents in rice
C、vitamin A and iron elements in crop
D、soil quality in poor areas
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7m27777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Physician.B、Psychologist.C、Fictionalwriter.D、Historian.A由于整篇探讨的都是人的个性、行为方式等,因而作者很可能是心理学家。
A、Hawaiiiscoolernow.B、ThevegetableshavebecomeaccustomedtotheweatherinHawaii.C、Theyarecheatedtobelievethatthe
Nowadays,incominggenerationsreallyrelynowonthepowerofthe"Internet"whenitcomestosearchingforinformation.Justt
Readingexpertshavebeeninterestedforalongtimeindiscoveringwhatmakesreadingmaterialdifficult.Agreatdealof【B1】_
A、Manywelcometheideaofhavingmorebarsonboard.B、Manyprefertheferrytomaintainitspresentspeed.C、Somesuggestimpr
AreWeTurningintoaNationofLoners?Marriageisdown,andsoischildbirth.Butdivorceisup,alongwithsingle-person
TheThree-YearSolutionHartwickCollege,asmallliberal-artsschoolinupstateNewYork,makesthisoffertowell-prepared
A、Hewasthemostinfluentialfigureinbadminton.B、Hehadwon21All-Englandchampionshipinbadminton.C、Hehadwonthegold
Itmightbesupposedthatefficiencyshouldbeachievedonlyifseveralpeoplecooperatetosolveaproblem.Suchresultsareby
A、Itwillconfineustothefourwalls.B、Wewillhaveunlimitedfreedom.C、Therichwillbeevenricher.D、Educationwillbewi
随机试题
扩孔要求精度较好时,底孔直径可扩大为扩孔直径的80%~90%。
小儿,5岁。体温突然升高至39℃,头痛、咽部不适1天,出现均匀分布的红色针尖状丘疹,触之有砂纸感。腋下、肘窝、腹股沟等皮肤皱褶处,皮疹密集,可见紫红色线。全身皮肤弥漫性潮红,皮疹之间不能见到正常皮肤。患儿患有急性坏死性小肠结肠炎,其临床表现不包括
50岁,宫颈活检确诊为“子宫颈癌”,妇科检查发现癌组织浸润达阴道穹隆处,双侧宫旁柔软,无增厚,未及浸润结节。假设宫颈刮片细胞学检查巴氏Ⅲ级,应行进一步检查为下列哪项
洋地黄的绝对禁忌证为
()是指财政提供公共产品和服务满足社会公共需要的基本属性,具有整体性与非排他性。
窗洞过梁和外窗台要做好( )。
某上市公司2016年以5000万元购得一处高档会所,然后加以改建。支出500万元在后院新建一露天泳池,支出500万元新增中央空调系统,拆除200万元的照明设施,再支付500万元安装智能照明和楼宇声控系统。会所于2016年年底改建完毕并对外营业。当地规定计算
试述在教学中如何运用记忆规律,提高记忆的效果。
目前工人文化宫为了谋利随意出租场地,严重影响了文化宫的功能发挥,对此群众的意见很大。如果你是文化宫主任,将如何处理?
Hewouldcertainlyhavegotthereontime______.
最新回复
(
0
)