首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
23
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
Robots making clothing would compel the clothing companies unable to develop robots well to face difficulties.
选项
答案
N
解析
[N]段指出,服装业固定成本高,规模效益显著。在未来,拥有制衣机器人的公司将有优势赢得市场,反之,无足够资金研发制农机器人或不擅长这方面的公司则极有可能被淘汰。题干中的Robots making clothing和face difficulties分别是对原文中shirt-making robots和find itself left in the cold的同义转述,故选[N]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7tP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Itwasmorerespected.B、Itwasusedbymorepeople.C、Itwasvandalizedbytourists.D、ItquicklydeterioratedagainafterLi
A、Theyarepoweredbybattery.B、Theydon’tdelivernicotine.C、Theydon’tlooklikecigarettes.D、Theywillsoonbeonthemark
中国的四大发明包括指南针、火药、造纸术和印刷术。它们是中国在人类文明史上占有重要地位的标志之一。第一个指南针产生于战国时期(theWarringStatesPeriod),是利用天然磁石(naturalmagnet)来辨别方向的一种简单仪器。火药发
民俗活动
可持续发展是20世纪80年代提出的一种新的发展观。这种模式要求在保护环境的条件下发展经济,既要满足当代的需求,又不能损害后代人的利益。它的核心思想是确保经济、资源和环境的协调发展,目的是让子孙后代享受充分的资源和良好的环境。可持续发展是中国的一项基本国策。
中医(TraditionalChineseMedicine)是中华文化不可分割的一部分,为振兴华夏做出了巨大的贡献。如今,中医和西医(westernmedicine)在中国的医疗保健领域并驾齐驱。在定义上,中医是指导中国传统医药理论和实践的
青海湖位于海拔3,205米、青海省省会西宁以西约100公里处,是中国最大的咸水湖,面积4,317平方公里,最深处25.5米。有23条河注入湖中,其中大部分是季节性的。百分之八十的湖水源于五条主要河流。青海湖位于跨越亚洲的几条候鸟迁徙路线的交叉处。许多鸟类把
我国政府历来非常重视汽车工业的发展。自1949年中华人民共和国成立以来,为了将汽车工业发展成为民族工业,政府对其给予高度保护。然而,在诸多汽车企业中,上规模的并不多。20世纪80年代中期以来,在投资优惠政策(preferentialpolicy)的鼓
中国悠久的历史、广袤的国土、与海外文化的广泛接触孕育了中餐的独特艺术。中国有一句古话至今还广为流传,叫作“民以食为天”。几千年的推陈出新和不断积累,使中餐受到越来越多的海外人士的青睐,成为我国对外文化交流的一个友好使者。中餐烹调所用的天然配料品种繁多,
期货市场是一个高度组织化的市场,因此,不允许没有实物的交易者卖出期货合约。()
随机试题
急性肾炎(阳水)风水相搏型的证候特征是( )急性肾炎(阳水)湿热内蕴型的证候特征是( )
胸部外伤早期剖胸探查的指征是
A.101xB.401xC.60lxD.≥100lxE.≥150lx音乐厅的照度标准为
A.丙酸倍氯米松B.沙美特罗C.异丙托溴铵D.扎鲁司特E.茶碱分子内有嘌呤结构()。
下列哪些情形对合一方的行为在法律上没有被明文规定为犯罪?
(2006年)如图6-12所示,两水箱水位恒定,水面高差H=10m,已知管道沿程水头损失为:hf=6.8m,局部阻力系数:转弯0.8、阀门0.26、进口0.5、出口0.8,则通过管道的平均流速为()m/s。
下列属于证券公司的资产管理业务的是()。
某企业是一家传统加工企业,仅有一个或几个间接成本集合,成本集合通常缺乏“同质性”。该公司适宜采纳的成本核算制度是()。
与“究天人之际,通古今之变,成一家之言”这句话同出一人之口的是()。
She______thehighunemploymentfiguresasevidenceofthefailureofthegovernmentpolicy.
最新回复
(
0
)