首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
admin
2017-03-15
65
问题
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebrated and seasoned, he was thus a natural choice to serve on an independent "commission on growth" announced last month by the World Bank. (The commission will weigh and sift what is known about growth, and what might be done to boost it.)
Natural, that is, except for anyone who takes his 1956 contribution literally. For, according to the model he laid out in that article, the efforts of policymakers to raise the rate of growth per head are ultimately futile.
A government eager to force the pace of economic advance may be tempted by savings drives, tax cuts, investment subsidies or even population controls. As a result of these measures, each member of the labour force may enjoy more capital to work with. But this process of "capital deepening", as economists call it, eventually runs into diminishing returns. Giving a worker a second computer does not double his output.
Accumulation alone cannot yield lasting progress, Mr. Solow showed. What can? Anything that allows the economy to add to its output without necessarily adding more labour and capital. Mr. Solow labeled this font of wealth "technological progress" in 1956, and measured its importance in 1957. But in neither paper did he explain where it came from or how it could be accelerated. Invention, innovation and ingenuity were all "exogenous" influences, lying outside the remit of his theory. To practical men of action, Mr. Solow’s model was thus an impossible tease: what it illuminated did not ultimately matter; and what really mattered, it did little to illuminate.
The law of diminishing returns holds great sway over the economic imagination. But its writ has not gone unchallenged. A fascinating new book, Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations by David Warsh, tells the story of the rebel economics of increasing returns. A veteran observer of dismal scientists at work, first at the Boston Globe and now in an online column called Economic Principals, Mr. Warsh has written the best book of its kind since Peter Bernstein’s Capital Ideas.
Diminishing returns ensure that firms cannot grow too big, preserving competition between them. This, in turn, allows the invisible hand of the market to perform its magic. But, as Mr. Warsh makes clear, the fealty economists show to this principle is as much mathematical as philosophical. The topology of diminishing returns is easy for economists to navigate: a landscape of declining gradients and single peaks, free of the treacherous craters and crevasses that might otherwise entrap them.
The hero of the second half of Mr. Warsh’s book is Paul Romer, of Stanford University, who took up the challenge ducked by Mr. Solow. If technological progress dictates economic growth, what kind of economics governs technological advance? In a series of papers, culminating in an article in the Journal of Political Economy in 1990, Mr. Romer tried to make technology "endogenous", to explain it within the terms of his model. In doing so, he steered growth theory out of the comfortable cul-de-sac in which Mr. Solow had so neatly parked it.
The escape required a three-point turn. First, Mr. Romer assumed that ideas were goods—of a particular kind. Ideas, unlike things, are "non-rival": Everyone can make use of a single design, recipe or blueprint at the same time. This turn in the argument led to a second: the fabrication of ideas enjoys increasing returns to scale. Expensive to produce, they are cheap, almost costless, to reproduce. Thus the total cost of a design does not change much, whether it is used by one person or by a million.
Blessed with increasing returns, the manufacture of ideas might seem like a good business to go into. Actually, the opposite is true. If the business is free to enter, it is not worth doing so, because competition pares the price of a design down to the negligible cost of reproducing it.
Unless idea factories can enjoy some measure of monopoly over their designs—by patenting them, copyrighting them, or just keeping them secret—they will not be able to cover the fixed cost of inventing them. That was the final turn in Mr. Romer’s new theory of growth.
How much guidance do these theories offer to policymakers, such as those sitting on the World Bank’s commission? In Mr. Solow’s model, according to a common caricature, technology falls like "manna from heaven", leaving the bank’s commissioners with little to do but pray. Mr. Romer’s theory, by contrast, calls for a more worldly response: educate people, subsidies their research, import ideas from abroad, carefully gauge the protection offered to intellectual property.
But did policymakers need Mr. Romer’s model to reveal the importance of such things? Mr. Solow has expressed doubts. Despite the caricature, he did not intend in his 1956 model to deny that innovation is often dearly bought and profit-driven. The question is whether anything useful can be said about that process at the level of the economy as a whole. That question has yet to be answered definitively. In particular, Mr. Solow worries that some of the "more powerful conclusions" of the new growth theory are unearned, flowing as they do from powerful assumptions.
At one point in Mr. Warsh’s book, Mr. Romer is quoted comparing the building of economic models to writing poetry. It is a triumph of form as much as content. This creative economist did not discover anything new about the world with his 1990 paper on growth. Rather, he extended the metre and rhyme-scheme of economics to capture a world—the knowledge economy—expressed until then only in the loosest kind of doggerel. That is how economics makes progress. Sadly, it does not, in and of itself, help economies make progress.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、A government eager to force the pace of economic advance may encourage savings, cut taxes, grant investment subsidies or even population control.
B、The new book Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations challenges the law of diminishing returns.
C、Neither the book Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations nor Mr. Solow’s theory is grounded.
D、Mr. Solow has expressed insistence that policymakers need Mr. Romer’s model.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7wSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ButashortdrivefromsomeofthepriciestpropertyinAfricaaretheCapeFlats,itisapatchworkoftownships.
Teachersofcross-culturalcoursesshouldhelpthestudentstobecome________tothetargetculture.
Aleadin5GbyChinesecompaniesshouldspreadtheiradvantageintomorelucrative,matureandstrategicallyinterestingmarket
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
为了成为国际一流的商业银行,今后国有商业银行必须围绕以下两个重点加快综合改革:一是进行产权制度改革,通过建立多元化股权结构,实现所有权与经营权的分离,建立起法人治理结构和现代银行制度。二是推进银行内部机制改革,强化内部管理,建立创新和激励机制,提高核心竞争
Children’ssurvival,protectionandgrowthhaveadirectbearingonacountryandanation’sfutureanddestiny.TheChinesena
Whoweretakenhostageinthereportedkidnapping?
Inanormalrecession,theto-dolistisclear.CopiesofKeynesaredustedoff,thebankslowerinterestrates,thepresidenta
中国坚定不移地走和平发展道路,是基于中国国情的必然选择。1840年鸦片战争以后的100多年里,中国受尽了列强的欺辱。消除战争,实现和平,建设独立富强、民生幸福的国家,是近代以来中国人民孜孜以求的奋斗目标。今天的中国虽然取得了巨大的发展成就,但人口多,底子
Belgiummayappeartooutsidersasagoodexampleofethnicpowersharing,butthelasttimetheFrench-speakingWalloonssuppli
随机试题
LearningaForeignLanguageInordertolearnaforeignlanguagewell,itisnecessarytoovercomefearofmakingmistakes.
氯丙嗪中毒引起的低血压不能用肾上腺素治疗,因为
患者,女性,50岁。呼吸衰竭入院,现患者无自主呼吸,应用简易呼吸器抢救。正确的做法是
监理工程师的业务内容具有很强的( )特点。
()不能作为索赔的证据资料。
下列属于分部工程施工质量优良标准的必要条件的是()。
水喷雾灭火系统报警阀组验收要求有哪些?
ABC会计师事务所的A注册会计师负责审计甲公司2016年度财务报表,与货币资金审计相关的部分事项如下:(2)因对甲公司人民币结算账户的完整性存有疑虑,A注册会计师检查了管理层提供的《已开立银行结算账户清单》,结果满意。要求:针
下列关于葡萄酒的说法中,正确的是:
已知关系R见下表,可以作为R主码的属性组是
最新回复
(
0
)